Create Construction company- Spend 20millions

profileaduverge
1-TheConstructionOrganization.pdf

Company Organization Contents:

• The Function of a Manager • Company Objectives • Company Policies • Company Strategy • Small Company • Medium-Sized Company • Large Private Company • Public Liability Company or Corporation • Board of Directors • Acquisition Integration Options • The Span of Control • Pattern of Communications • Matrix organization • Departments/Functions • Market Planning and Development

• Public Relations (PR) • Construction Operations • Services • Plant Organization Options • Administration • Health, Safety, Occupational Welfare and

Pensions • Educational Qualifications and Vocational

Training • Work-Based QCF NVQ Qualifications • Construction Skills Certification Scheme (CSCS

Card) • Corporate Social Responsibility • Management Attitude

1. Introduction

Much has been written theorizing on the recommended methods to be adopted by management for successfully leading and controlling companies for most types of industry, but it is emphasized that many firms have relied on the traditional ingredients of hard work, thrift, enterprise, the ability to assess an opportunity, generate dynamism and the entrepreneurial skills of an ambitious individual for business success. As yet, there is no set of rules and regulations to guarantee commercial security. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the managerial arrangements that prevail in most construction companies and have proved necessary to ensure their continued viability.

1.1 The Function of a Manager A business is merely a fairly efficient way of combining the skills and talents of people into an organisation that can produce goods and services in sufficient quantity to satisfy the material desires of the community in which it exists, and importantly provide sufficient return on the capital invested. The primary responsibility of management is to ensure that the resources available to the firm for producing economic wealth are used in the best possible way within the social and legal frameworks that shape its business context. The practical implications, however, depend on each individual

enterprise, for example, environmental, social and ethical issues arising from business activity are currently of growing concern to consumers. Clearly, any impact on customer purchasing mores would require attention, probably exercised through more serious corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies than hitherto. Under such potentially changed society values and market conditions, continued demand for profit-generating products would at least provide a guiding signal that the devised business model was properly using resources for the commercial purpose. To these ends, certain broad organizational arrangements are desirable if management is to exercise its essential duty of welding the various parts of the enterprise together, so that all elements can operate in unison.

2. Company Objectives

• Best Kind of Business to Operate In: The entrepreneur often bases this decision on instinct and personal experience, but more careful analysis is needed for the established and growing company. Indeed, reliance on the status quo product or a core competence does not ensure survival as a cursory look over any 20-year period at company names listed on the Stock Exchange will reveal.

• Kind of Goods and Services to Be Offered: As far as the construction market is concerned, this may mean taking decisions about whether to concentrate on building schools or houses, speculative or tendered contracts, negotiated work such as design and build, PFI/PPP, management-type contracting, or specialist subcontracting, etc., as well as laying emphasis on innovation, quality, delivery on time and developing good and continuing relations with the client.

• Desired Share of the Market: The likely markets need to be based on careful evaluation of economic trends and opportunities, all married to a detailed assessment of the firm’s growth prospects and potential capability to assemble the appropriate commercial, managerial and technical skills, resources, etc.

• Development of Know-How: Creating sales increasingly relies on innovation in products, services, construction processes and management, where continuous attention to improving skills and expertise of the workforce and suppliers is essential in adding value.

• Possible Changes and Fluctuations of the Market in Future Years: Political, economic and social shifts in consumer outlook, particularly concerning the environment and quality, all vary between different markets and over time.

3. Company Policies Policies are general statements to guide decision-making and strategic planning towards ensuring consistency with the organization’s objectives, often written up in manual form, and these may be broad in scope or very specific, for example:

• Generate profit responsibly, for example, it is unlikely that the safety or welfare officer can pay the same single- minded attention to this objective as the project manager in charge of a construction site;

• Continuously improve the quality and value added; • Train and develop the workforce to a managed plan; • Look for profitable growth through negotiated contracts; • Operate in a particular geographical region; • Purchase IT resources centrally; • Conduct in-house R&D; • Source timber supplies from sustainable managed woodlands; • Recycle waste in line with recognized environmental targets;

• Deal only with environmentally sustainable building/construction development; • Meet the standards and obligations desired by the society in which the company operates; • Comply with modern corporate social, environmental and sustainability responsibilities.

4. Company Organisational Structures The choices of managerial organisation most suited for the company are many and depend upon many factors such as size, geographical location, type of work done, managerial/technical skills available and extent of subcontracted work/outsourced supplies. Noticeably, in contrast to selling enterprises, with the attendant need for a complex management structure to penetrate markets wholesale, the construction-only function dictates a relatively flat arrangement with few levels of management. And, unlike manufacturers with sole responsibility for a product, contractors rarely need comprehensive in-house design capacity, so in effect rendering even the international contractor’s structure, at least at head office, relatively uncomplicated.

However, on a very large scheme the complex tiers of management commonplace in the factory or production plant may be partly evident at site. Furthermore, as more design-and-build work develops, firms are upgrading business- development departments in particular and strengthening organisational mechanisms for coordinating design partners similar to the project-management arrangements described in Fig. 8.9, where, for example, teams are established to oversee projects from inception to completion. Structures are also evolving to manage more intense quality-assurance procedures and better control of subcontractors and external suppliers through strengthened management of the purchasing function all linked to a greater emphasis on health, safety and environmental issues in the more stringent climate governed by the Construction Design and Management (CDM) regulations and corporate-social-responsibility issues.

4.1 Small Company The simple form of organisational structure divided by functions is common to the smaller company with construction interests limited to a few specialties’ only, for example:

• Concrete structures; • Steel erection; • House building;

• Earthmoving; • Pipe lying.

It is also well suited to the small and medium-sized local construction company, where technical specialisms are few, departments controlled by a single manager and all the contracts handled from head office, with perhaps only a general foreman/supervisor on site.

Such companies are usually headed by the major and controlling shareholder appointed as managing director (broadly, president in US terminology) whose duties typically embrace the following responsibilities:

Make policy and provide strategic guidance;

• Manage the company in compliance with the stated objectives and articles; • Coordinate the activities of the various business departments; • Establish staff functions’ procedures; • Define and implement the health, safety and social responsibilities’ policy of the company; • Develop and standardize cost-effective procedures for departments; • Develop the company’s business, revenue base and profitability; • Foster a customer-oriented culture; • Establish sound working relations with clients and shareholders; • Promote the company’s identity; • Direct and improve operations and management systems.

4.2 Medium-Sized Company As a company increases the volume of its turnover, the contracts undertaken tend to become more complex and extra skills need to be recruited. The head-office structure, therefore, not only expands but also subdivides into separately managed elements. The structure begins to take on the form with the major functions typically led by salaried senior managers, sometimes having director status. A director is an officer of the company entitled to a modest fee for services rendered and as a member of the board of directors is collectively responsible for running the company as set out in the articles of

association. Posts such as the managing director or finance director are usually contracted to carry out specified additional duties in a salaried executive capacity. Some directors could be major shareholders.

Administration subdivided into elements

Services subdivided into elements

Accounts subdivided into elements

4.3 Large Private Company The underlying principle of the simple form of structure is retained but commonly decentralised into specialist divisions, units and departments, for example, civil engineering, building, housing, groundworks, international construction, geographical regions, general contracting, management/design and build, special products, etc., executed through the board of directors (vice-presidents), led by the managing director However, the appropriate degree of autonomy of functions or units, particularly services and administration departments, depends upon the market, geographical spread, supply chain, communication demands, etc. Indeed, for diversified group holdings, variants of the matrix-type organisation may be more appropriate for achieving a lean cost base.

The large company generally undertakes contracts of many types and sizes, which demands considerable resources and a variety of skills, especially competent directors, managers, staff, workforce and suppliers. The mechanisms needed to bring about expansion vary in relation to market opportunities, coupled with the ability of the organisation to secure work at competitive prices delivered to budget, on time and to the client’s satisfaction. Since inherent growth is restrictive in an industry overburdened with competitors, raising market share is more commonly sought through takeovers and diversification into different commercial interests. But for the private firm, opportunities are limited as an accurate valuation of the company to be acquired needs to be assessed, owners persuaded to sell and sufficient funds obtained to secure the controlling proportion of shares in the new subsidiary.

Investigations suggest that such strategies have in general failed to produce better balance-sheet results than firms not pursuing growth by acquisition. Growth, nevertheless, helps build up assets paramount as collateral in gaining access to major construction work such as Design Build Finance Operate (DBFO) and Build Own Operate Transfer (BOOT) projects where financial support from the banks and financial houses is essential in raising capital to finance the significant long-term investments involved.

Holdings of a group of companies

Notably, the proportion of individual long-term shareholders and institutional investors such as pension funds is gradually losing voting strength to professional fund managers whose investment interests are often short-term, related to company share and the stock market index performance.

5. Board of Directors The board of directors, who may be shareholders, varies according to need, for example, salaried or contracted officers comprising the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Operating Officer (COO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO), responsible for oversight of major strategic segments, plus other key functional officers and invited non-executive directors (ostensibly independent and the majority in US corporations) paid a fee to serve on the main board. Usually, the Chief Executive Officer is a salaried employee (and also commonly a director) contracted, or fired when necessary, by the board to steer the enterprise and delegated with power of management and authority. Investigations suggest that the most successful companies recruit the CEO from experienced, dynamic, internal candidates. But in order to contain excessive independent action of the CEO, a very senior director is sometimes nominated as chairperson to preside over business affairs, represent the company externally and internationally, act as its senior ambassador and deal with stakeholders and outside bodies. Directors are approved and appointed, or removed, subject to breach of contract, by the shareholder(s) at a general meeting, but the board may independently fill vacancies and engage additional directors. Consequently, in practice, shareholders have limited influence, as resolutions and board membership nominations for the annual general meeting (AGM) are largely the board’s prerogative. Likewise, proxy votes delegated to the chair provide the board further poll advantage, although a majority of shareholder(s) can call an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) to vote in a completely new board of liking if necessary. Divisional MDs (vice-presidents) usually sit on an operational board at secondary level, typically headed by the COO and responsible to the main board. In some European Union states, the main board is split into a supervisory board of independent/non-executive directors (including worker or union and shareholder representatives), tasked with strategic oversight and governance and a management board of executive directors (appointed by, and responsible to, the former), separately concentrating on company operational management. Non-Executive Directors: The main role of the non-executive directors is to offer specific expertise emanating from influence in banking, politics, the legal profession, business development, shareholder interests, etc. Such knowledge and contacts can be invaluable when defending against hostile takeover bids, particularly with mechanisms such as ‘poison pills’, ‘white knights’, staggered boards and other legal impediments. The independents also usually chair the senior appointments, remuneration and audit committees, to ensure that good governance structures are in place to maximize shareholder value. Indeed, good governance and corporate social responsibilities are becoming more onerous tasks for the public company, notably, monitoring of: ethical standards; formalized executive responsibilities for the published accounts and non-executive directors’ responsibilities for the audit, remuneration, compensation, nominations and data-security committees; appraisals of board members; the appointment of consultants and advisers; shareholder and employee democracy; the role of trade unions on the company board; and environmental policy.

Proposed EU regulations require an independent triennial evaluation of the board of directors involving assessment of both the performance of each individual board member and their effective working as a team. Appointment of an independent chairperson and a good mix of long-serving and new directors may become the standard expectation, with the non-executives appointed independent of the Chief Executive (CEO) and having relevant qualifications.

6. Acquisition Integration Options Acquisitions by various means are normally undertaken to open up a fresh route to the market, a new product or an innovative technology. For example: (1) The vertically (or backwards) integrated company acquires firms in the same category of business but at a different production-process stage, for example, the contractor with a supply chain comprising mostly subcontractors under ownership. (2) Horizontal integration represents mergers or takeovers of companies in both the same line of business and production- process stage, for example, a house builder buying a competitor to increase market share. (3) A conglomerate is merely a diverse holding of unrelated businesses, usually acquired to diversify income and profit sources.

7. The Span of Control A company needs to grow; otherwise, the resulting stagnation may eventually lead to absolute decline. With expansion, organisational structures tend to develop as shown above, necessitating differing levels of management. The task of coordinating the various activities then soon exceeds the capacity of the individual, requiring management to delegate responsibility, coupled with some authority, to subordinates. Practice suggests that a manager can cope with between five and eight subordinates; indeed, construction companies typically allocate on average one contracts manager to about five site managers. Clearly, therefore, the extent of a flat or tiered management structure appropriate for the business requires careful consideration.

8. Pattern of Communications The pattern of communication and control in the industry is much the same as that used by the military, with direct lines of command between manager and assistants in each department. In most companies, however, service functions are necessary. The usual procedure is for the service manager to communicate through the head of the department that is receiving the service, for example, formwork designs may be undertaken at head office for implementation on site. Officially, head office only provides a service and will have no authority on site, but in practice considerable authority is vested by virtue of specialist skills. Such relationships are called functional ones, and their success depends very much upon cooperation between individuals. Managers at similar levels of responsibility in the organisation, who report to the same superior, or to a different superior at a common level, need to cooperate with one another on a lateral basis. Since much communication is at this level, workable relationships are thus of the utmost importance if the company is to operate successfully. Typically, the important lateral relationships below directorate level are business development, construction operations, engineering services, administration and finance.

While many companies lay down a formal management structure in the form of a ‘family tree’, in practice many informal relationships are demanded by the organisation; hence, the newly appointed manager is well advised to settle in slowly and understand these lines of communication before making many decisions.

9. Matrix Organisation In a business engaged in total-package contracts and/or operating globally, the matrix management structure offers resources- allocation advantages, by combining both functional and project-management structures. For example, in the engineering-type organisation , specialist/expert functional managers heading mechanical, electrical engineering departments, etc. coordinate with individual project managers responsible for delivering the products on site, by providing the required information and specialist resources’ support. Importantly, centralized communication is essential to effectively coordinate, monitor and control the disparate elements involved. Hence, for construction work in particular, the paramount pressure to ensure tight end results for an individual project favours lead responsibility being placed with the project manager, who in effect ‘buys in’ the required services.

Clearly, the balance of responsibilities between functional heads and project managers will vary depending on the nature of the end product. For example, in business development, the marketing department might more effectively take the lead role. (See Chapter 8 for a more detailed description of project procurement and project management.)

10. Market Planning and Development

The business-development function is primarily concerned with marketing, particularly developing growth by identifying and seeking out new opportunities, promoting the firm’s products and services, including responsibility for technical appraisals and supply of advice to customers on all aspects of the firm’s business from procurement to final delivery. With demanding clients increasingly emphasizing improved value for money and better quality in the provision of their construction requirements, the function now extends beyond mere selling or simply tendering for workload to embracing the key elements needed to operate successfully in the expanding markets for design-and-build work, partnering, management contracting, etc. Consequently, for the larger concern, all the major technical and managerial elements required to draw clients into meaningful contracts are essential. Indeed, to some degree, a well-founded department would contain a wide variety of the company’s expertise, acting independently in a business-development role and embracing capital-sourcing expertise, scope/feasibility design services, cost planning, estimating, construction planning, buying, legal and contractual services, etc. As the function develops in importance, the mechanisms for apportioning its costs in the company will need to be carefully evaluated so as not to overburden the allocations made to conventionally generated turnover.

11. Public Relations (PR) The public-relations function is commonly sought externally from consulting firms able to provide a professional service of supplying the press and public with prompt and accurate information concerning subjects about corporate activities of value and interest, but also offering advice to senior management, for example, in development of productive relationships with NGOs, special-interest and activist groups, etc. While the role has tended to rival marketing and advertising departments, the latter are increasingly taking up PR responsibilities by making use of the rapidly expanding opportunities available through web-based social networks to

develop their ‘reputation management’ image as the ‘trusted’ influencer between the company and potential clients and customers.

12. Construction Operations 1. Production: Once a contract is secured, the site manager responsible for the efficient execution of construction is fairly

independent of the rest of the company, relying on service departments only when necessary. Overall authority is exercised through a contracts manager based at head office, which can generally make specific demands on service managers, although the official relationship is only lateral. Indeed, with the trend towards more subcontracting and associated supply-chain management, coordination of the latter functions, particularly planning, purchasing, BIM, cost control and IT, is becoming a stronger feature of the production responsibility needing director-level leadership.

2. Subcontractors and Suppliers: Few contractors are sufficiently vertically integrated with subsidiary companies able to supply all the materials, equipment, components and technical-installation expertise needed for a given project and consequently rely on specialist subcontractors. Unfortunately, the ready availability and willingness of many to undertake work, particularly labour-only subcontractors, have hindered progress in providing clients with guaranteed quality. The introduction of Quality Standards such as ISO 9000 is an attempt to improve performance in this respect with the more enlightened clients and contractors increasingly requiring all suppliers and subcontractors to have secured approved quality-assurance procedures.

3. Construction Site Management: the precise project arrangements will vary depending upon the degree of the contractors’ involvement in actual construction, for example in the case of general contractors, subcontractors and similar, the functions shown are all likely to be present. While in other types of contracting such as management contracts, the site labour force responsibilities are largely eliminated, conversely, there will be a need for strengthened design, planning and cost-management teams to work closely with the client’s advisers because design tends to continue alongside construction and works/subcontractors have to be carefully coordinated.

Notwithstanding these differences, the contracts manager, usually head-office based on all but the very large project, is responsible to the board for the overall successful management of the project(s), particularly the financial and legal aspects, together with dealings with client or the representative. The site manager oversees the day-to-day control of the processes conducted on site including liaison with the architect/civil engineer regarding instructions, payments, progress

meetings, and commercial dealings with subcontractors, etc. The construction engineer can have manifold duties ranging from construction planning, interface/design coordination/BIM liaison, materials’ control, and waste management through to setting out. The site supervisor carries the onerous task of coordinating the labour force through the crew leaders, whether directly or self-employed. Both would need to have close functional ties with respect to supervising subcontractors and suppliers. The project quantity surveyor normally deals with construction economics, embracing valuation and agreement of completed work for payment, costing of variations, cost control itself and, commonly, bonus payments. The other functions are reasonably self-explanatory.

13. Services These functions have traditionally provided support to construction operations, but in recent years with the trend towards more design-and-build, etc., a much fuller lead role at board level is increasingly necessary to cover the range of expertise needed in developing projects from enquiry through design to construction including possibly maintenance and, even, operation of the facility. Indeed, complete project-management teams may be necessary for major projects.

1. Estimating and Tendering: Commonly located under services for traditional contracting but more appropriately allied to the business-development function where negotiated projects dominate, the usual procedure is for an estimator to be responsible for pricing work, whether negotiated enquiries or tender estimates involving a bill of quantities to which a mark-up is added for the final bid, this latter amount being decided at directorate level.

2. Head-Office Planning: The functions of central planning are several: (a) To support the estimating department, this in traditional contracting is often located under services, in providing tender programmes, method statements and generally coordinating the whole tendering exercise. (b) To provide planning and coordinating services to site for those tenders that turn into contracts. (c) To support functions and processes concerned with lean construction, particularly quality management, risk and value management, design coordination, building information modeling (BIM), environmental impacts, CSR and stakeholder issues, and waste management. Such arrangements have created problems for virtually all planners at head office, irrespective of the company.

3. Purchasing: The buying department is responsible for obtaining all materials’ quotations and subcontractor

procurement for both the tender and contract stages. At the tender stage, the usual procedure is for a buyer to be responsible, so that the necessary quotations are at hand when required. Once a tender turns into a contract, the purchasing responsibility is then handed over to a more experienced buyer, who can hopefully negotiate the most favorable terms for the contract before placing the final orders. Increasingly, the function is playing a more central control and audit role in the supply chain. The advantages of centralizing purchases are:

1. Provides a central point of responsibility for several contracts; 2. Standard procedures can be adopted; 3. Bulk purchasing is possible; 4. Experience is developed; 5. Head-office administration facilities are readily available; 6. Monitoring and audit procedures can be readily applied;

Supply-chain participants’ performance and costs may be more effectively compared against target indicators.

4. Construction Economics: This function is customarily carried out by the quantity surveyor (QS) and embraces responsibilities for the measurement of, and the subsequent correct payment for, work done on site, including negotiation of new work, variation orders, subcontractor payments, claim situations for each contract and, commonly,

the budgetary and cost-control elements. Usually, the quantity surveyor is site-based, with the QS department at head office executing unfinished business on completed contracts. Furthermore, cooperation and central coordination with purchasing are becoming essential for efficient supply-chain management and auditing.

5. Engineering Support: Unless the project is very large, functions such as formwork design, temporary-works design and support for the implementation of lean-construction techniques are located at head office.

6. Research and Development (R&D): R&D activities tend to feature strongly with the suppliers of manufactured goods to the industry rather than with construction companies themselves. Indeed, the sector generates relatively little patenting of technology or intellectual property for commercial exploitation. However, the trend towards more design- and-build should provide better incentives for construction firms to invest in near-market research centred around improving commercial and management expertise and product performance, particularly development of manufactured standard components and units to maximise assembly and reduce in-situ operations on site. To this end, collaboration with the universities through staff-development projects such as Knowledge Transfer Partnerships (KTPs), involving research undertakings leading to advanced qualifications, provides valuable opportunities for building a research culture where little existed previously.

7. Plant and Equipment: The location of equipment control in the company’s organisational structure depends upon many factors, some companies preferring the plant department to operate as a profit-making division, hiring out both internally and in the open marketplace. Other companies use the plant department as a service, providing only those common items of equipment necessary on most contracts.

13.1 Plant Organisation Options • Independent Plant Hire: The firm operates in effect as a plant hire concern, in which plant is owned by either an

independently formed company or a separate division of a construction company, or similar, and hired out to clients with the main objective of making a profit. Should the needs of the parent construction company arise, then this would be met on a similar basis to that of any other client.

• Controlled Plant Hire: Few construction companies can build up sufficient and diverse equipment holdings to provide an independent plant hire service. However, some of the large concerns possess considerable plant assets and, to encourage profitability, external hire is sometimes undertaken to raise utilization levels. But, because outside hire must meet the demands of the market, there exists the danger that such matters as servicing and maintenance of the externally hired plant may receive priority over the internal needs of its own construction sites.

• Internal Plant Hire: Some contracting companies prefer to restrict their plant holdings to a purely service function by supplying only the internal needs of the company. A suitable rate of return on capital is required and the plant department is operated as a cost center in order to encourage profitability. But, since there is little external competition, frequently items of plant are acquired to suit the needs of the construction contracts and thus economical utilization levels cannot always be achieved and consequently hire rates get distorted.

• Low Plant Ownership: Plant ownership requires workshop facilities, experienced and mobile maintenance crews, and administrative facilities, etc. Many companies prefer to avoid this problem by operating only a very few equipment items, such as concrete mixers, small excavators, etc. Any major requirements are simply rented from the vast choice

of hire firms available in the independent sector. Where there is a steady demand for hired-in plant, the company may sometimes institute a policy of hiring through a central administration to take advantage of competitive hire rates and even facilitate the transfer of plant between sites.

• No Plant Structure: The final option is to have an unstructured organisation, whereby individual contracts purchase their plant requirements and are credited with resale values when the plant leaves the site. In this case, care has to be exercised in assessing equitable sums when purchases and resales are internal transactions.

13.2 Administration The administration function is often too large to control as a single entity and is to be found in separate elements in most companies. The list includes personnel/human resources, environmental management, health and safety, occupational welfare, education and training, social facilities, postal services, legal and insurance facilities, wages and salaries, records, data protection and security, maintenance and corporate social responsibilities. The function is headed by an administration manager or director with subordinate managers responsible for groups of the above elements, reporting directly. Few of the duties are site-based, possibly excepting safety, wages and canteen provision.

1. Information Technology: Construction continues to compare unfavorably with other sectors in the application of Information and Communications Technology, occupying a position towards the bottom of the industrial league table of IT spenders per employee. Notwithstanding, the growth of ICT in recent years demands that construction companies control these particular resources centrally in order to provide a degree of standardisation and avoid incompatibilities within the organisation, which can become an especially acute problem if departmental managers are allowed to acquire computers and software products without reference to an agreed company strategy and administration procedure. It also becomes imperative to provide reliable data protection for all aspects of the firm’s business.

2. Quality Management: Similarly, with the introduction of ISO 9000 quality standards into a company, the role of the quality-assessment unit should be to advise departmental managers in preparing quality-assurance procedures and work instructions and thereafter to follow up with inspections and assessments to sustain the expected performance levels. Indeed, where the firm has gained approval by external bodies such as the BSI, Investors in People Kite marks, etc., regular internal audits of functions and departments are essential as preparation for external assessment visits.

3. Finance and Accounts: The financial-management function is responsible for bookkeeping, payment of invoices, provision of Companies Acts information and preparation of the trading, profit/loss accounts and balance-sheet results. Most importantly, the financial officer or director needs to work closely with the MD or CEO in controlling the overall financial affairs of the company. Furthermore, although each individual contracts manager is informed about the financial position of their project and must endeavor to keep within tender figures, it is the finance manager’s concern to monitor the overall financial position of the company.

14. Health, Safety, Occupational Welfare and Pensions

• Health and Safety

The task of setting up health and safety (H&S) assurance procedures for the company and subsequent assessing provision in the workplace is best separated under a different chief executive officer/director from the departmental and project managers actually responsible for operations on site under, for example, the CDM and COSHH (Control of

Substances Hazardous to Health) regulations. In this way, any conflict of interest between the needs of production and safety is minimized, with systems in place and problems avoided if and when, visited by the Health and Safety inspectorate or in meeting requirements of the CDM H&S coordinator.

• Occupational Health and Welfare Occupational health (OH) is the promotion and maintenance of the physical, mental and social well-being of workers by controlling risks and adapting work to suit people, and people to their jobs. To this end, the construction industry has established Constructing Better Health (CBH) as the not-for-profit organisation to deliver the National Scheme for the management and improvement of occupational health by focusing on:

Setting industry standards for both work-related health issues and competency of occupational-health provision;

• Building a construction-specific knowledge portal; • Centralizing the collection of work-related health data; • Transmitting fitness-for-task data to enable employers to manage work-related health risks at site level; • Providing a referral route through to specialists in the field of return-to-work and rehabilitation.

Members pay an annual rate dependent on turnover, which gives access to a range of CBH advice, information, software, training and accreditation of schemes to help in the management of employee work-related health data and fitness-for-task outcomes

• Pensions Changing societal attitudes to employee welfare may lead to pressure for more spending on employee pension contributions to address the imbalances? Notably, in the public sector, male and female employee membership of workplace pension schemes was respectively 87% and 82%. Contrastingly, only 39% and 28% belonged to a workplace pension scheme in the private sector – a situation perhaps to be gradually righted by reapportions within the P&L account and generating significantly greater ‘value added’ in corporate output.

15. Educational Qualifications and Vocational Training The programmes of learning in the school/further education (FE)/higher education (HE) sectors aim to provide specific knowledge, testing of understanding, qualifications and citizenship for starting out on personal, trade, technical, and specialist and professional careers. A subsequent programme of training and continuous professional development (CPD) can assist further development of skills, knowledge and competency in the workforce. In a company the use of employee training and education with help of universities are very useful and a must for working, as these are beneficial for its employee to stay updated with their knowledge.

16. Corporate Social Responsibility In general, government through elected politicians is accountable to citizens for determining the goals of regulators, dealing with externalities, mediating between different interests, attending to the demands of social justice, providing public goods, collecting taxes, prioritizing and organizing the necessary resources, etc. Nevertheless, under intensifying globalized trading conditions, enlightened company boards, particularly multinational corporations, are gradually paying more attention to social-responsibility policy beyond the minimum requirements stated in their articles of association, as a means of addressing pressing international and public concerns specifically related to business ethics, while also meeting normal obligations to shareholders and other stakeholders for profit generation. A CSR initiative, consultant, officer or department, is typically

charged with the task of advising an appropriate senior executive on matters such as: business ethics; relevant corporate governance and integrity; accommodation of sustainability and environmental issues; cooperating with the local community in generating employment opportunities through training and apprenticeships; ethical management practice – avoiding dealings and investments in socially unacceptable sectors of commerce or industry, denying contracts with companies aggressively exploiting their workers and similar social injustices, transparency of corporate political donations, etc.

The process can be observed at varying degrees of execution as: (i) Traditional corporate philanthropy such as worthy causes perceived as ‘giving something back to the community’. About 1% of pre-tax profits is usually set aside for this purpose, usually dispensed as cash contributions to charities or support for local- community development initiatives. (ii) As a sub-layer of CSR risk management to address shareholder demands for investments to be used to good effect and implemented through NGO codes of practice and conduct, aimed at offering greater transparency in commercial undertakings and forestalling PR disasters, for example, child labour in the supply chain, distribution of inappropriate drugs and medicines, etc. (iii) Relationship Marketing (RM) may also be extended to embrace competitors and stakeholders, aimed at achieving common CSR rules, to spread risks and shape opinion, for example, mining operations and similar extractive industries, environmental management, project financing, etc., where the host government may have an overriding interest in arbitrating between the affected parties ostensibly for the public good. CSR should be fully embedded into the Stakeholder Management strategy so that CSR decisions across the company’s operations are so completely ingrained that the notion of ‘doing well by doing good’ becomes part of the company’s competitive advantage. Moreover, the UN Human Rights council code requires ‘due diligence’ in implementing human rights’ machinery. Thus, national support agencies may be needed to provide sufficient funds for firms operating in, or exporting to, conflict zones to enable human rights’ issues to be taken into account, so that the duties of the involved contractors and host government are adequately well balanced in order to protect the interests of investors and the needs of the host countries in discharging their human rights’ obligations. For example, deals agreed between a multinational company and governments may have to indemnify the company against legal charges and costs related to improving human rights. In addition, corporate complicity law is becoming more and more to the fore as companies get entangled with accusations of involvement with human rights’ abuses, for example, loan of construction equipment to a government using it to demolish homes. Indeed, international work is inching towards a definition of corporate complicity, with governments reviewing existing laws and creating a new, directed at limiting corporate activities.

The United Nations (UN) Global Compact Code offers guidance to the business community for attaining acceptable CSR standards.

17. Management Attitude • Opportunity: Most employees favor the firm that provides good opportunities for promotion. Indeed, in most

organizations virtually 80% of value added is achieved by the more motivated 20% of the workforce; hence, a good company should have a sound policy of manager development to assist promotion of this more dynamic element from within. Nevertheless, care must be exercised to ensure that sufficient ‘outsiders’ are also introduced to resist the tendency to loss of drive when relationships become stagnant. While people from other companies and industries often bring fresh ideas and attitudes, manager selection can become problematical if the company is in a rapid-growth situation. Extensive outside recruitment often then becomes unavoidable, potentially leading to a shambles of conflicting personalities, values and attitudes, resulting in a poor public image of a ‘flying by the seat of the pants’ type of enterprise.

• Personnel Development: Manager Development first implies recruitment of well-educated people having common purpose with the enterprise, followed by attention to career development and giving opportunity to gain experience in as many parts of the organisation as possible. The young appointee permanently on site will gain little knowledge of the working of the company as a whole. To become a well-rounded manager, it is essential for them to spend one or

two years in a head-office-based department, well supplemented with short courses providing information on modern management techniques.

• Motivation: A core duty of a manager is to coach assistants, who will then go a long way in encouraging motivation, essential if the members of the team are to pull their weight effectively and wholeheartedly. Morale must be high; nothing is more inspiring than a feeling of confidence. Many managers unwittingly destroy this confidence through excessive egotism, arrogance, being over-secretive, aloof and not communicating small but significant information about the department to their assistants. Thus, it is of vital importance that managers know where they stand in relation to assistants and gain their fullest respect. In return, the assistants will expect some interest to be shown in their careers and promotion prospects; otherwise, able people will be quickly disillusioned and look elsewhere for employment. A negative attitude in this respect can lead to an unhealthy cluster of people at the top, leaving few with experience to take over when the time arrives.

• Leadership: Leading a team demands the ability to combine human resources and obtain the best performance possible. To do this, requests and orders are necessary and these can only be really effective if assistants are willing to carry them out efficiently, although they may not fully respond without respect for their superior. Leaders, by implication, should therefore be inspiring people of experience, understanding and vision, and have enough confidence to delegate responsibility and stand by decisions, while also instilling discipline.