lecture reflection essay

profiletenuised
1.docx

NR451: Capstone, Milestone 1

Strength of Research

The Milestone 1 assignment asks you to identify the strength of the research. This is outlined in pages 238-244 of Dearholt and Dang (2014). Strength of research can be categorized into High quality, Good quality or Low quality/Major Flaws based on the criteria summarized below.

Research Studies:

High Quality:

· Results are consistent, generalizable

· Adequate sample size

· Definitive conclusion

· Based on comprehensive lit review with reliable references

Good Quality:

· Moderately consistent results

· -Adequate sample size

· -Conclusion is given and moderately definitive

· -Fairly Comprehensive lit review and some scientific evidence is present

Low Quality/Major Flaws:

· Results are inconsistent

· Sample size is not sufficient

· Conclusions are not given or appropriate.

Non-Research Studies:

High Quality:

· Sponsored by professional organization or governmental agency.

· Discloses objectives

· Expertise of author is evident, thought leader in field

· Literature and scientific support is evident

· Current, within the past 5 years

· Definitive conclusion

Good Quality:

· Sponsored by professional organization or governmental agency.

· Discloses objectives

· Expertise appears to be credible but cannot be completely confirmed

· Literature and scientific support is present and mostly aligns

· Current, within the past 5 years

· Fairly definitive conclusion

· Logical arguments for the conclusions given.

Low Quality/Major Flaws:

· Not sponsored by professional organization or governmental agency.

· Limited or no lit review

· Inconsistent results, unable to draw conclusion

· Not current (within 5 years)

· -Objectives not stated or unclear

· Expertise cannot be confirmed

Based on:

Dearholt, S. L., & Dang, D. (2012). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines (2nd ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.

1