Innovative Design Thinking (Human Resource)

HR Innovation through Design Thinking

BA8003 Page 6 of 7

Page 6 of 7 Release No 1

CA 10 (Non Redistributable Component) META MAP AND REFLECTION PAPER (25%) DUE ON WEEK 5 (PAIR WORK)

Design a Meta Map that showcase the tools/skillsets acquired from the Design Thinking process. Additionally, in a 1,000 words report with a professional format with font size no smaller than 11 and 1.5-line spacing, a cover page that shows the title and name and admission number of the student, students should highlight their reflection on their process understanding. Both the meta map and reflection will be assessed as follows and meets the following criteria and that will be assessed on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows:

Criteria &

Weights

Below Expectations

(<3)

Meet Expectations

(3)

Exceed Expectations

(>3)

Meta Map

Content

(20%)

Not very clear or

accurate

representation of the

design thinking

process

Some issues in an

otherwise accurate

flow of the design

thinking process

Clear representation of the

student’s understanding of the

tools, techniques and

sequencing of these tools and

techniques in the ideation and

innovation process of design

thinking

Choice of

medium, size

and execution

of Meta Map

(10%)

Poorly executed

meta map that may

be due to choice of

medium, design,

inappropriate size or

actual creation

Engaging design with

a size and usability

that is easy to handle

and physically it

should not exceed A4

dimensions and

include a description of

each of the items in

the map

Highly engaging and it is in a

medium that is easy to use and

physically it should not exceed

A4 dimensions and include a

description of each of the items

in the map

Meta Map

Organization

(20%)

Poorly organized and

missing of key

elements of the

process

No major flaws in the

organization and

completeness of the

process

Well organized systematically

and show the progression of the

stages of Design Thinking

Reflection on

Process

Enhancement

(25%)

Unable to identify

any benefit of the

current process or to

critically appraise the

current process for

any opportunity for

enhancement

Able to attempt to

show some critical

thinking on the current

process and possible

enhancements

Can show their understanding of

the effectiveness of the design

thinking process and the critical

thinking of how they can identify

opportunities that the student

can propose to enhance the

entire process

Personal

Skillset

Reflection

(25%)

Superficial show of

personal reflection

and does not indicate

much evidence of

personal reflection

Able to indicate the

level of skill set

proficiency

Can show how the student has

estimated the enhancement of

their skill set and any steps that

they may want to take to enjoy

even greater success in

business innovation and design

Table 3: Scoring Rubric for CA3 META MAP & Reflection

 Please note also that plagiarism will be severely punished. No marks will be awarded to any student who violates this (plagiarism) rule.

 Late submission may result in marks penalty.

HR Innovation through Design Thinking

BA8003 Page 7 of 7

Page 7 of 7 Release No 1

PARTICIPATION MARK (PM) - Class Participation (15% of final Grade) Class participation from students is greatly emphasized and encouraged. Directed learning time provides students with the opportunity to do research and field work and also share their findings in class. Class participation will be assessed in the following areas:

1) Attendance, punctuality and attitude

2) Constructive contribution to class discussions of concepts learnt and any discoveries that they

make during their own study and online and in-class quiz performance

3) Teamwork performance and engaging participation during non-CA presentations and

stakeholder engagement

4) The table below shows the 3 areas of assessment

Criteria &

Weight

Below Expectations (less than 60%)

Meets Expectations (between 60% and 80%)

Exceeds Expectations (more than 80%)

Attendance

Punctuality &

Attitude

(30%)

3 or more

occurrences without

valid reason;

attitude that is not

very engaging or

constructive

Nil occurrences without

valid reason; an attitude

that is consistently

engaging and constructive

Nil occurrence with a good and

consistent display of professional,

engaging and constructive

attitude

Class

Sharing

(30%)

Occasionally

contributes to class

discussion or

contributions that

do not show depth

or unable to

elaborate well.

Able to participate

meaningfully and

respectfully in discussions

raised that show that the

student has considered and

thought about the ideas

and concepts in class.

Occasionally able to

generate new discussions.

Able to generate frequently

constructive and meaningful

discussions, sharing and

showcase of work in class that

highlight well thought out and

executed concepts or some new

discoveries that are meaningful

and interesting to the student. The

student should also explain why

their discoveries and personal

work are interesting and

meaningful.

Teamwork

Performance

(40%)

Shows a higher

degree of self-

preservation

instead of working

towards the team’s

needs.

Able to contribute to the

team’s leadership in

steering the work and also

show how the student is

able to work to engage

stakeholders meaningfully

and respectfully.

Shows great ownership and

teamwork by building up team

camaraderie by leveraging on

team strengths and helping others

overcome challenges. Knows

when to step forward and when to

let others do so – able to act as a

catalyst in the team in completing

assigned tasks as well high

degree of stakeholder

engagement.

Table 5: Scoring Rubric for Class Participation (PM)