racismo, xenofobia

Please choose one of the following movies: Precious (2009), Pariah (2011), John Q (2002). View and critically analyze the film and answer the following questions:

• Identify and explain the types of oppression presented in the film. Take into account the terms discussed in Workshop 3 (racism, xenophobia, ethnocentrism, classism, ageism, machismo, sexism, heterosexism, misogyny, homophobia, transphobia, and religious fundamentalism.) Describe and explain how various manifestations of oppression were presented simultaneously.

Explain how the intersectionality of oppression can affect a person.

Identify and explain the concepts of Internalized Oppression, Interpersonal Oppression, Organizational Oppression, Inter-group Oppression, Structural Oppression, Social Oppression, and Community Oppression, which in your opinion were evident in the selected film.

Contribute a minimum of 3 pages of content. It should include at least 2 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

This activity will be evaluated with the Essay Rubric.

Be sure to review the  academic expectations for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

• Submit your assignment by 11:59 pm on Saturday
• Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
• Your assignment will be run through Turnitin to check for plagiarism. Please check your results, make any necessary corrections, and resubmit a revised copy if the system identifies issues.

 

Rubric

2022 Essay Rubric

2022 Essay Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

Mastery of the information

30 pts

Excellent

The essay content aligns complies with the information requested and shows complete mastery of the content by showing complete information, details and examples.

25 pts

Good

The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows good mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information. But may have missed some details or examples.

20 pts

Acceptable

The essay content aligns with the information requested and shows partial mastery of the content. Provides sufficient information but lacks details and/or examples.

10 pts

Needs work

The essay content does not align with the information requested. Does not show mastery of the concepts and lacks information, details and/or examples.

0 pts

Not submitted

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization

Structure of the essay

20 pts

Excellent

The essay has a clear format with an introduction, body with clear transitions between evidence and supporting arguments and a conclusion. The information is presented in an orderly manner. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document.

15 pts

Good

The essay has a clear format with an introduction, body with evidence and supporting arguments and a conclusion. All elements facilitate the flow of the information in the document, but essay may missing transitions between sections, or has other small issues with organization.

10 pts

Needs work

Essay structure is problematic. Has one of these issues: The essay does not have a clear introduction or conclusion. OR The conclusion does not take into consideration the information presented. OR Evidence and supporting arguments are not aligned. OR The flow of the document is difficult to follow.

5 pts

Poor

Essay does not appear to have any structure. No introduction, progression of thought or defined conclusion.

0 pts

Not submitted

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking

Development of Ideas

15 pts

Excellent

Details are considered and a point of view, thesis statement or main idea is clear. Presents excellent evidence, arguments or examples to support the point made. Draws insightful conclusions based on the information presented.

12 pts

Good

Details are considered and a point of view, thesis statement or main idea is clear. Presents sufficient evidence, arguments or examples to support the point made. Draws appropriate conclusions based on the information presented.

9 pts

Needs work

Details are considered and a point of view, thesis statement or main idea is identified. Presents some evidence, arguments or examples but some are not relevant to support the point made. Draws appropriate conclusions but not all are based on the information presented.

3 pts

Poor

Details are not considered and a point of view, thesis statement or main idea is vague. Evidence, arguments or examples are disconnected or not relevant. Lacks a conclusion or simply repeats previous statements made.

0 pts

Not submitted

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Supporting Information

15 pts

Excellent

Supporting information is pertinent to the discussion, up to date (depending to what is acceptable in the field) and from academic and trusted sources.

12 pts

Good

Supporting information is pertinent to the discussion topic. Sources are not the most recent (depending to what is acceptable in the field) and from academic and trusted sources.

9 pts

Limited

Supporting information is pertinent to the discussion topic but not all sources are from academic and trusted sources; may or may not be the most recent (depending to what is acceptable in the field).

3 pts

Needs work

Supporting information is not pertinent to the discussion and/or none of the sources are from academic or trusted sources.

0 pts

Unacceptable

No supporting information

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

Mechanics

10 pts

Excellent

Writing is entirely free of typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

8 pts

Good

Minimal (1-3) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

5 pts

Needs work

Multiple (4-9) typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

0 pts

Not submitted

0 pts

Problematic

10 or more typos, spelling, grammatical, punctuation, or translation errors.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation Literacy

Correct application of APA

10 pts

Excellent

Flawless execution of APA. Correct formatting, setup, title page, and perfect citations and references.

8 pts

Good

Correct formatting, setup, title page, with minimal formatting or punctuation errors in the citations or references.

6 pts

Needs work

Correct formatting, setup, title page, but significant errors with citations and references.

2 pts

Problematic

Incorrect formatting, setup or missing title page, and/or problematic citations and references.

0 pts

Not used

APA style not used

10 pts

Total Points: 100

Previous Next