MGT510:Module 13: External Growth Strategies and Implementation

profilebinayad1
_MGT510_Module13_PPT_Ch14.ppt

*

CONTEMPORARY STRATEGY ANALYSIS

tenth edition

Robert M. Grant

John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2019

Chapter 14

External Growth Strategies:

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Alliances

  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • Strategic Alliances

External Growth Strategies:

Mergers, Acquisitions, and Alliances

2

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc..

OUTLINE

27

Global M&A

1998-2018

*

Chart1

1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Vodafone—Mannesman $183bn. Aol—Time Warner $165bn. Pfizer—Warner Lambert $90bn. Glaxo—Smith Kline Beecham $76bn. SBC—Ameritech $70bn.
Exxon—Mobil $85bn. Citicorp—Travelers $70bn.
Dow Chemical—DuPont $130bn. Royal Dutch Shell—BG $81bn. Charter Communication— Time Warner Cable $78bn. Dell—EMC $67bn. H.J. Heinz—Kraft Foods $54bn.
RBS/Santander/Fortis—ABN AMBRO $81bn. Enel—Endesa $60bn. Procter & Gamble—Gillette $57bn.
Royal Dutch Petroleum—Shell $75bn. Sanofi—Aventis $60bn. JPMorgan Chase—BancOne $59bn.
Gaz de France—Suez $75bn. Pfizer—Wyeth $68bn. Novartis—Alcom $52bn.
AT&T—BellSouth $73bn.
Comcast—AT&T Broadband $72bn.
Bell Atlantic—GTE $71bn. Pfizer—Pharmacia $60bn.
InBev—Anheuser-Busch $52bn. Bank of America —Merrill Lynch $50bn. .
Verizon Communication— Verizon Wireless $130bn. .
Actavis—Allergan $71bn. .
AT&T—Time Warner $85bn. Bayer—Monsanto $66bn. BAT—Reynolds $58bn.
CVS—Aetna $70bn. Cigna—Express Scripts $67bn. AT&T—Time Warner $109bn. Walt Disney—Fox $85bn.
Value of M&A deals (S millions)
2288
3034
3167
1530
1058
1210
1721
2531
3371
4191
2531
1757
2117
2655
2700
2800
4802
4660
3850
3522
3458

Sheet1

Value of M&A deals (S millions)
1998 2288
1999 3034
2000 3167
2001 1530
2002 1058
2003 1210
2004 1721
2005 2531
2006 3371
2007 4191
2008 2531
2009 1757
2010 2117
2011 2655
2012 2700
2013 2800
2014 4802
2015 4660
2016 3850
2017 3522
2018 3458

Are Mergers Successful?

  • Evidence from Shareholder Returns:
  • Small increase in the combined value of the 2 companies involved
  • Gains flow (almost) entirely to shareholders of acquired companies
  • Returns to shareholders of acquiring companies negative on average
  • Evidence from Accounting Profits
  • Diverse findings: “…the results from these accounting-based studies are all over the map”
  • Key problem: separating the effects of the merger from the many other factors that influence firms’ profitability
  • Diversity of M&A
  • Lack of consistent findings reflects the vast diversity in types of mergers and characteristics of the firms involved
  • Even when mergers categorized (e.g. horizontal, vertical, conglomerate) no consistent performance differences

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Success and Failure among

Mergers and Acquisitions

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Successes Failures
Exxon – Mobil Daimler - Chrysler
Procter & Gamble – Gillette AOL-Time Warner
Walt Disney Co. – Pixar Royal Bank of Scotland - ABN AMRO
Tata Motor – Jaguar Land Rover Hewlett Packard - Autonomy
Sirius – XM Radio Bank of America – Countrywide
Cemex – RMC Alcatel – Lucent
Bank of America – Merrill Lynch Sprint - Nextel
Heinz–Kraft Foods Sears – K Mart
Geely–Volvo Microsoft–Nokia
Dell–EMC News Corp.–MySpace

*

Motives for Mergers and Acquisitions

Managerial Motives

  • Top management remuneration depends more on firm size than profitability
  • Psychological rewards--M&As project power, confer CEO celebrity status
  • Imitation: the fear of not participating in an industry’s merger wave

Financial Motives

  • Stock market inefficiencies—acquire undervalued companies (Berkshire Hathaway-Heinz): use overvalued equity to acquire (AOL-Time Warner)
  • Quest for tax savings—cross-border acquisitions to relocate to lower tax regime (Burger King-Tim Horton)
  • Financial re-engineering: debt-financed acquisitions that reduce the acquired company’s cost of capital (KKR-RJR Nabisco)

Strategic Motives

  • Horizontal M&A—economies of scale and market power (A-B Inbev-SAB Miller)
  • Geographical extension M&A—to enter overseas market (Geely-Volvo)
  • Vertical M&A—to acquire supplier or customer (Gencore-Xstrata)
  • Diversifying M&A—to enter a new area of business (Amazon-Whole Foods)

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

*

Managing Mergers and Acquisitions

Challenges of Pre-merger Planning

  • Careful identification of the goals of M&A
  • Difficulties in estimating the benefits of M&A: on average cost savings overestimated by 25%, revenue increases by 70%

Challenges of Post-Merger integration

  • Problems of integration: incompatible management systems; clash of cultures; adjustment difficulties by employees of acquired company
  • Building acquisition capability—managing the learning process to ensure that acquisition experience builds capability
  • Marching post-merger management to the strategic goals of the merger: leveraging the firm’s existing business model (e.g. Walt Disney and Pixar) vs. reinventing the business model (e.g. HP and Autonomy)

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

*

Types of Strategic Alliance

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Strategic Alliances:

Collaborative arrangements between two or more firms to pursue common goals

Alliance goals: technological, marketing and distribution, operational, standard setting, lobbying…

Formal (contractual agreements, written understandings) or Informal

Equity (partners take equity stakes in one another) or non-equity

Bilateral alliances (two partners), multilateral alliances (many partners), networks of alliances (Toyota supplier network; Apple “ecosystem”)

  • Joint Ventures:
  • Partners form a jointly-owned enterprise to pursue the goals of the alliance

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

17

SiRF Technology Holdings Inc

Kia Motors Corp

Uni-Pixel Inc

Ube Industries Ltd

Robert Bosch Stiftung GmbH

Sala Enterprises

Bglobal PLC

Universal Display Corp

IBM Corp

SAP AG

ARM Holdings PLC

Global Foundries Singapore

Panasonic Corp

NTT

NEC Corp

Thomson SA

KT Corp

Dreamworks Animation SKG Inc

Singapore

Telstra Corp Ltd

Intel Corp

Hynix Semiconductor Inc

Nanosys Inc

TLC Corp

SIP State Property Holding

Juniper Networks Inc

Infineon Technologies AG

Reactrix Systems Inc

Quintiles Transnational Corp

Sumitomo Chemical Co Ltd

Huawei Technologies Co Ltd

Russia

Samsung Electronics

Fujitsu Ltd

Source: Prof. Andrew Shipilov

Samsung Electronics’ Alliances, 2014

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

ISUZU

SUZUKI

TOYOTA

IBC (built vans in the UK, 1989-98)

GM

NUMMI

(produced cars in

the US, 1984-2009)

Production JV; 10% ownership

40% owned

60%

owned

50% owned

50%

owned

SAAB

50% owned 1989-2000

FIAT

Technical collaboration, joint purch-asing & 20% ownership, 2000-6

FAW

JV producing light trucks in China

DAEWOO

50.9% owned; technical &

production collaboration

AVTOVAZ

JV produces

cars in Russia

SAIC

Production JVs in China

Indonesia, India

PEUGEOT

Joint development

& purchasing

HINDUSTAN MOTORS

Production JV in India, 1994-99

NISSAN

Product sourcing

General Motors’ International Alliances

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

*

18

Management Issues

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Motives:

To exploit complementarities among the resources and capabilities of different companies, e.g. airline alliances allow access to members’ route networks; Bulgari and Marriott combine to operate luxury hotels

These benefits include: Economizing on investment, Speed, Risk sharing, Learning (capability acquisition)

Challenges:

Need for relational capability: building trust, developing knowledge-sharing and coordination mechanisms

Managing the relationship: greatest benefits often involve greatest management challenges—e.g. cross-border alliances

Sharing of benefits: determined by

strategic intent of the partners (Which partner is clearer about what it wants from the alliance?)

appropriability of the contribution (Which partner’s resources and capabilities are easier to capture)

absorptive capacity (Which partner is the faster learner?

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

17

Do the firm’s resources and capabilities fit the needs of the current strategy?

YES

INTERNAL DEVELOPMENT

NO

Contract or inter-firm combination?

  • Parties’ level of agreement over the value of the required resources

HIGH

LOW

Alliance or acquisition?

  • Desired closeness with resource provider

CONTRACT

HIGH

LOW

ALLIANCE

ACQUISITION

STRATEGIC ALLIANCES

Choosing the Right Growth Path

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.