Knapp, S. (2001). Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 242-54. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_07
According to this journal, a forensic psychologist is involved in a forensic examination as employees of the attorney or as a court-appointed evaluator. In either case, the truth is served if experts engage each other with evidence, facts, and information. Also, based on Ethics Code, forensic psychologists should base their finding on the assessment of information enough to give valid substantiation for the findings. It is important for experts to give accurate information to the court. Integrity is fundamental in presenting noticeable improvements to predict behaviors. It is also argued that accuracy and integrity are exercised when forensic psychologists examine concluding. The researchers emphasize that psychologists should avoid making a professional statement about an individual whom they are to evaluate personally.
Integrity is also expected incompetence. In this section, it is argued that according to the Ethics Code, forensic psychologists should restrict their practice to areas of expertise or competence. From this journal article, it is true that forensic works are rewarding for psychologists; however, forensic psychologists contribute to the public welfare when they conduct their business in an ethical matter and this case, with integrity.
MEDOFF, D. (Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC). Protecting the Integrity of Forensic Psychological Testing. Retrieved July 30, 2018, from http://levinedisputeresolution.com/news-jan-2013-protecting-integrity-forensic-psychological-testing
According to this author, a forensic psychological test which by great extent rely on scientific and empirical methods are not a matter of convention, but they reflect strict compliance with scientific reliability and adhesion to the professional code of ethics which include integrity. The emphasis integrity and sound testing approach stem from authority associated with invalid testing as compared to psychological assessment procedures such as interviews. The paper presents the idea that "American Board of Professional Psychology" appreciate the role of integrity in enhancing competence through a forensic test.
Through investigation of previous cases in US Supreme Court of instance “General Electric Co. v. Joiner (1997)” and “Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993)”, the authors believe that these legal cases set a new tempo in consideration of expert testimony based on information from specialized knowledge. In the second case, the decision by the court considered the scientific reliability of the approach of gathering data. Reliance on these factors increases the reliability of forensic psychologists' testimonies.
It is argued that professional guidelines and conventional approaches of forensic practice need systematized and well-established procedure for the integrity of the test. Also, the research emphasizes that use of forensically wrong path for forensic psychology jeopardize the integrity of the methodology used. By extension, this means that practice standards, ethical guidelines, and increase competence make evidence more liable.
Finally, the study shows that lack of acceptable comparison group, reliance on a test which have known error rate and biasedness raise concern on the integrity of the expert. This is because the approaches are speculative and subjective, and they lead to zero accountability. The journal supports the known idea that lack of integrity compromises legal decisions.
Mohandie, K., & Meloy, R. (2013). The Value of Crime Scene and Site Visitation by Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists. Journal of Forensic Science, 58(3), 719-725. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12135
The researcher in this journal argues that the concept of integrity is tied to crime scene visitation and site visits by the forensic psychologists. These actions enhance the credibility and accuracy of the forensic work. The integrity sound approach of data collection offers benefits to the forensic mental health professional, assess the reliability of witness and give subject motivation. The article provides emphasize on the investigation, and its credibility depends on the integrity of the process. Site visits may increase reliability and provide a rich data source.
It is also stated that when carrying out an investigation, the forensic practitioners seek integrity by looking at issues from a reasonable perspective and with the benefit of competence. The authors believe that visit to the location of occurrence give competence and the legal profession get a different source of information which is more accurate, along with experimental context. Also, the article state that forensic psychologists enhance objectivity and honesty in their research and investigation by use of "forensic reports, forensic opinions and forensic testimony on all available data." Moreover, site visit strengthens forensic psychology comports according to this practice guideline.
From the evidence and facts presented in this journal, it is clear that the researcher supports the idea mentioned above that forensic psychologist research provides specialized knowledge to courts. Lack of integrity has contaminated or derail justice, and as presented here, accountability is lacking in site visitors. Visiting the scene of interest is an essential methodological solution for unethical forensic science assessment, it promotes quality and integrity injustice.
Moser, S. (2013). Confirmation Bias: The Pitfall of Forensic Science. Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 1(1), 70-74. Retrieved July 29, 2018, from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol1/iss1/7/?utm_source=scholarworks.sjsu.edu%2Fthemis%2Fvol1%2Fiss1%2F7&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
According to this journal article, forensic practitioners and science are held in high esteem in criminal court because of the ability to get undeniable facts which cannot be obtained in any other way. Despite this, the experts can entertain genetic fallacies and search for unrecognized sources to confirm beliefs and change information. To restore the needed reliability, the data sources of confirmation bias should be eliminated after identification. The article argues that forensic scientists frequently infer they analyze data submitted by the prosecution. Also, forensic experts have close contact with investigators who give out information about a scenario. The study highlights that there is the danger of getting extraneous information during verification. To reestablish the integrity of the field, causes of validation bias need to be considered, known and excluded. Some sources of external and inherent confirmation bias include the association of crime and dependence of police agencies and the information made available to check the examiners. The journal articles also offer some methods of increasing integrity, and these include the establishment of study requirements for forensic examiners, privatization of crime labs, institution of double-blind, and separation of interpretation and testing.
In conclusion, the researcher emphasizes that it is necessary to reduce sources of error and when deciding the fate of an individual, diligence should be considered. Moreover, to preserve the integrity of forensic psychology, roots cause of biasedness should be eradicated. The sources of this partiality and private and institutional.
Ward, T., Gannon, T. A., & Vess, J. (2008). Human Rights, Ethical Principles, and Standards in Forensic Psychology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(2), 126-44. doi:10.1177/0306624X07313986
The journal article relates the idea of human rights and integrity. According to the researcher, human rights protect an individual and give them a chance to continue with their life without interferences from other people. Despite this, the lack of integrity and other ethical principles can jeopardize individual rights. The researchers argue that integrity involves behaving honestly and in a professional way with offenders. Integrity requires psychologists to give relevant information to avoid misleading offenders unless when another people welfare is at stake. Moreover, the researcher believes that when engaging in activities like court cases and other mandate psychologists should be aware of the confidentiality. The journal further argues that forensic experts should use psychological measures rightly, ensure they get the right training and ensure the assessment ends in an etiological formulation which is based on unique personal characters. Integrity implies that any choice made for an individual should be thought out because it impacts personal freedom.
The researchers emphasize that good judgment should have cognitive skills related to the ability to make and evaluate goals. Further, a lack of integrity because of inconsistencies or discrimination erode the confidence of the offender in the therapy. The paper also appreciates that consistencies in integrity are delicate because of competing, conflicting and pressure in legal studies.
Wettstein, R. M. (2008). Ethical Practice in Forensic Psychology: A Systematic Model for Decision Making Forensic Ethics and the Expert Witness. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 36(4), 595-598.
The journal article emphasizes that ethics is essential in forensic psychology. Moreover, it is argued that moral conscience determines the development of legal rules in social dealing thus law and moral create and maintain social good. The researcher contends that experts should give information which will help in setting free or convicting a suspect and this should be done by upholding integrity. Moreover, the experts should be since, straightforward and honest. Fairness and impartiality are areas where experts have the biggest challenge. Despite this, the researcher believes that forensic psychologist should avoid prejudice and investigate issues with undistorted lenses. The journal points out that forensic practitioners are expected to strive for honesty, accuracy, and truthfulness in practicing forensic psychology and fight temptations of partisan which make some give misleading and inaccurate information
It is further argued that lack of integrity is a result of increase or presence of a conflict of interest. The interest includes social, financial or political. In this case, the journal states that forensic psychologist should withdraw. The journal is relevant in this study because forensic psychologists must give services consistent with the highest integrity of their career. Given this journal, a psychological forensic expert can act with integrity if they have the competence to present evidence or to give testimony as demonstrated by their knowledge.
References
Knapp, S. (2001). Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 242-54. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_07
MEDOFF, D. (Levine Dispute Resolution Center LLC). Protecting the Integrity of Forensic Psychological Testing. Retrieved July 30, 2018, from http://levinedisputeresolution.com/news-jan-2013-protecting-integrity-forensic-psychological-testing
Mohandie, K., & Meloy, R. (2013). The Value of Crime Scene and Site Visitation by Forensic Psychologists and Psychiatrists. Journal of Forensic Science, 58(3), 719-725. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12135
Moser, S. (2013). Confirmation Bias: The Pitfall of Forensic Science. Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 1(1), 70-74. Retrieved July 29, 2018, from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol1/iss1/7/?utm_source=scholarworks.sjsu.edu%2Fthemis%2Fvol1%2Fiss1%2F7&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
Ward, T., Gannon, T. A., & Vess, J. (2008). Human Rights, Ethical Principles, and Standards in Forensic Psychology. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(2), 126-44. doi:10.1177/0306624X07313986
Wettstein, R. M. (2008). Ethical Practice in Forensic Psychology: A Systematic Model for Decision Making Forensic Ethics and the Expert Witness. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 36(4), 595-598.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Integrity, competence and forensic psychology
Knapp, S. (2001). Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology.
Journal
of Personality Assessment, 77
(2), 242
-
54.
doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_07
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
1
Integrity, competence and forensic psychology
Knapp, S. (2001). Ethical Issues in Personality Assessment in Forensic Psychology. Journal
of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 242-54. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_07
tabaya.frmstrjng
_M3A2_Answer.docx
0
