Literature Review feedback

Literature Review Rubric

Marks Earned

Literature Review Rubric

15-10

10-5

5-0

13

Introduction:

· Provides rationale for student selection of literature

· Discussed search terms and techniques.

· Demonstrates the need for this research question

· Identifies if there is a theoretical or conceptual framework

Meets all outlined criteria and is succinct and sufficient. Logically demonstrates the need for this research question

Does not meet one of the criteria but is well organized, and sufficient. Logically demonstrates the need for this research question.

Does not meet two or more of the criteria and/ or is not organized, and sufficient. The reader cannot conclude the “so what”.

Highlighted in yellow were not addressed.

5

3

0

5

Clinical Question

· Includes the clinical question

Clinical question is clearly stated

Clinical question can be implied but was not clearly stated.

Clinical question was not stated and/or were not apparent from the literature review.

Highlighted in yellow were not addressed.

30-20

20-10

10-0

15

Background

Uses established critical appraisal criteria to evaluate each study essential components of each reviewed study. Including but not limited to:

· Type and size of sample

· Reliability and validity of instruments

· Methodology

· Consistency of data collection and procedures

· Appropriate data analysis

· Identification of limitations

The summary reflects the essential components of for all studies

The summary reflects most (lacking 2 or more elements) of the essential components for one or all of the studies

The summary reflects most (lacking 4 or more elements) of the essential components for either study

Highlighted in green was not addressed

across all articles.

You were expected to identify these elements in each article

.

25-15

15-10

10-5

20

Conclusion:

· Refection on the analysis and synthesis of material

· Identifies gaps and inconsistencies

· Summarizes overall strengths and weaknesses of the studies reviewed

· Discuss similarities and differences

Meets criteria. Is well organized, follow’s a logical sequence that allows the reader to arrive at a logical conclusion?

Does not meet 1-2 of the criteria but is organized, and/or demonstrates illogical sequencing or structure.

Does not meet >two or more of the criteria and/or is weakly organized with no logical sequencing or structure. Conclusions cannot be made.

You did a good job. However, you did not get full credit because you did not support with evidence-based literature.

10-7

6-4

3-0

10

Grammar

· See Turn-It-In for SPerr= spelling error

There are no major grammatical errors (<3 SPerr)

There are a few grammatical errors. (<5 SPerr)

There are major grammatical errors. (>5 SPerr)

Automatic 5 point deduction per page

Length

Exceed OR does not meet 3 – 5 page criteria by more than 2 page

5

3

1

5

Articles

· Selects 5 Primary sources

· Dated within last 5 years

· All sources are from peer reviewed journal

· At least one source is from a nursing journal

Meets all criteria

Does not meet one of the criteria

Does not meet two or more of the criteria

10-8

7-5

4-0

10

Support and Referencing:

· See Turn-It-In for

SEE SON INTEGRITY STATEMENT

Incorporates the text, course materials, and selected readings; does not use Wikipedia or other non-academic resources. There are minimal to no errors informatting,

Referencing and style. And

There are moderate errors in APA

Formatting, style, and referencing.

Severe errors in APA style, formatting, or referencing. Violates the School of Nursing

Student's Personal Integrity Statement more than 2 times

Total:

78

*All students will be given the opportunity to resubmit this assignment by Thursday 2359 of the same week that the assignment was graded if the Student participated in the LITERATURE REVIEW PEER REVIEW FORUM per discussion forum guidelines. An automatic 20 % deduction will be assessed to the re-graded submission.

Comments:

You did a good job. However, you did not address important items on the rubric. You can resubmit by Friday 7/29/22 for regrading. Make sure you highlight all corrections/changes, or it will not be graded.

Dr. Bright

Final Grade

78