easy due 7/5
CHAPTER FIVE WHAT IS A SCHOLARLY JOURNAL?
riminal Justice and Forensic Investigation scholars are expected to use scholarly
sources in all avenues of course assignments, including homework, discussion
postings (if on-line), projects, and research papers. Depending on the level of the
course or the scope of the assignment, the number of the expected scholarly sources may
vary. For example, students in the freshman and sophomore (100-200) level courses may
be required to use at least one scholarly source for research papers, while students at the
500-600 level (graduate school) may be required to use between 10-35 professional
journals, depending on the assignment. As one progresses through university studies, one
will find that the expectation to include scholarly work increases as students evolve into
higher level courses.
A scholarly or peer-reviewed source primarily advances knowledge in the discipline of
Criminal Justice or Forensic Investigation. These journal articles are generally original
research or present a new way to consider scholarly material. The articles usually involve an
extensive literature review of other peer-reviewed journals. The article then leads either to a
conclusive summary or to presenting new findings. Publishing a scholarly article is most
often the result of years of research and the authors have completed many drafts and
revisions. Before being published, the article is considered by a peer group of professional
scholars in the field or in the area of expertise to ensure quality, originality, and integrity of
the research, as well as significance to the field. This is called a peer review. The criteria
are very stringent; therefore, the published scholarly articles are considered valid and quality
work that best represents the discipline. Trade publications, popular media outlets, and the
Internet do not have this requirement, and therefore are not given the same credibility as
scholarly journal articles.
Students in the criminal justice or forensic investigation departments are expected to
recognize the difference and become more adept in using scholarly journal articles. This is a
crucial and necessary step. Students are expected to incorporate the most valid sources.
When in doubt about sources’ validity, the professor or instructor is the best resource.
Most university libraries host search engines, such as Ebscohost and ProQuest, as well
as many other data bases. There are also free sources, such as Google-Scholar and the
like. However, students should be cautious. Most search engines give researchers an
option of selecting scholarly sources only when searching these data bases. Too often, in
my experience, trade publications or popular media (newspapers) sources are often
improperly included. Therefore, one should not rely solely on the search engine to
determine scholarly journals.
Newspapers and news magazines are not scholarly journals. Although these outlets may
be valuable to establish chronological timelines, the magazines and newspapers are not
peer reviewed. The articles are regulated by editors and often news sources have either a
conservative or liberal spin. Therefore, these sources raise suspicion regarding credibility.
Secondary or Data Sources (like the datum found in the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice)
are usually published by government organizations or research organizations and simply
C
present findings and data. A strong example would be the crime rate. Data may show the
crime rate has risen or fallen but does not speculate as to why the crime rate has risen or
fallen. The reason is a speculation proposed by scholars, but data is data and facts are
facts that require interpretation and discussion. Data sources and some scholarly articles
are offered online. This does not necessarily put the articles into an Internet Category.
Although some of these internet sources are valuable in supporting student’s research, they
are not considered scholarly journals. As a rule of thumb, one should avoid websites that
end in .com (commercial) and should search for ones ending in .edu (education) or .gov
(government).
Sometimes students will cite their textbook in their research papers. As a general rule, a
textbook is a valid source for the course lectures, but it is not a strong source for papers or
assignments. Professors and universities choose course textbooks to serve as road maps
for their courses. Students are expected to read the textbook and use it to prepare for
examinations. However, textbooks are compilations of most of the current ideas on a
specific topic; therefore they are broadly presented. Journal articles are more focused on a
particular idea or point (remember the concept of depth). A strong practice would be to use
the textbook material to gain ideas for research. Students should pay particular attention to
the footnotes or citations in the textbook chapters as these footnotes will often guide
researchers to either journal articles or reliable secondary data sources.
Specific books in criminal justice or forensic investigation are often collections of
essays or articles on specific topics. These collections are valuable, but students should use
them cautiously. By the time a book is published, several years may have passed making
the book somewhat outdated. After seven years or so, students are better served finding a
journal article. However, students may be looking for classic works, (e.g., The Criminal Man,
Essay on Crimes and Punishment, Broken Windows, the Hsi Yuan Lu, etc.) and these are
often found in books. In summary, textbooks and books do not hold the same validity as
scholarly journal articles and I advise a sparing and utilitarian approach.
There are several helpful articles available on the Internet showing techniques for
differentiating scholarly journal articles from other sources. A motivated student simply
needs to visit a search engine and type in scholarly versus non-scholarly sources or how to
recognize scholarly sources. Over the years, I have collected and modified several of these
sources and have amassed these ideas into the following table. I believe the table to be
helpful as it reflects ideas from multiple sources.
At first, differentiating scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles from other sources
may appear cumbersome, but students’ skills will greatly improve as they progress through
their program and careers. One day, you may be publishing peer-reviewed journal articles
and I look forward to reading them.
Chapter Exercise: Kane’s Technique for Verifying Scholarly Journals
Step One: Students should first review this chapter paying close attention to the
provided table. In a lecture based course, students should be given instruction and
guidance regarding this chapter and their questions should be answered. When students
are clear on the differentiations, they should advance to step two.
Step Two: Students should gather their working purpose statements from the previous
chapter. Using their purpose statements as a guide along with their subsequent Discussion
subheadings, students should visit their university’s library (on-sight or electronically) to
research and discover:
Five (5) scholarly journal articles relating to their purpose statement. These must meet
the criteria found from the table and be published within the last seven years. Students
should be required to produce paper (hard) copies or electronic copies depending on the
course delivery. [Note: PDF copies of the article are preferred as these will show actual
page numbers for direct quotations later.]
At least one (1) relevant article from a trade journal. These must meet the criteria found
from the table and be published within the last seven years. Students should be required
to produce paper (hard) copies or electronic copies depending on the course delivery.
At least one (1) data source relevant to their purpose statement. These are commonly
found in the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice. These must meet the criteria found from the
table and the study should have been conducted and published within the last seven
years. Students should be required to produce paper (hard) copies or electronic copies
depending on the course delivery.
At least two (2) additional relevant sources from any criteria. These must meet the
criteria found from the table and be published within the last seven years. Students
should be required to produce paper (hard) copies or electronic copies depending on the
course delivery. Students should identify the category of these optional sources.
Step 3: The professor will evaluate the student’s declarations of sources and check the
relevance of the sources to the student’s research papers in progress. The goal of this
exercise is to give the student an opportunity to differentiate between various scholarly
sources, provide the student practical experience with research engines and databases, and
accelerate the research process and paper preparation.
One technique I always stress is that if students can find one relevant and current
scholarly journal article, then a review of that article’s references section should produce
several more scholarly sources. This is accomplished by simply examining the reference
section and the literature review section of that article. This is an effective research
technique that promotes accuracy and efficiency.
The products of this exercise serve as a foundation for the next chapter and the
corresponding exercise. In the next chapter, students will be introduced to effective and
meaningful literature reviews.
References
Kane, M.J. (2015). Research paper writing guide for criminal justice and forensic
investigation scholars. Crimeink Publishing. ISBN 13: 978-1-63415-618-9
Available from www.songerinstitute.com
Differentiating and Identifying Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Other Sources.
Page 1 of 3 Peer
Reviewed
Scholarly
Journals
Trade
Publications
Secondary Data
Sources
Popular
Media Outlets
Internet
Purpose of the
Article
Present
research,
theories, or
methods
Present
industry trends,
new products/
techniques, or
organization
news
Present data
from surveys
and studies,
results with few
or no
implications
Entertainment Advertise
and
Entertain
Intended
Audience
Scholars,
Researchers
Students
Business or
industry leaders
( i.e., police
chiefs,
wardens,
private security)
Scholars,
Researchers
Students
Administrator
Policy Makers
General
Public
General
Public
Authors Scholars and
Researchers
Look for
Academic
Credentials
Journal Staff
with editor,
staff and
freelance
writers
Government or
Independent
Research
Organizations
i.e., BJS, NIJ,
Census, grant
managers
Publication
staff; May
have
contributing
freelance
writers
Anonymous
or unknown
authors;
Often the
title of the
web page is
your author
Peer
Review?
Yes Very
strict and blind
reviewed
No Articles
are accepted by
the editor or a
team of editors
No Data
is edited by
statisticians or
government
oversight
No
Articles are
accepted by
the editor or a
team of
editors
No Often
self
published
Differentiating and Identifying Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Other Sources.
Page 2 of 3
Peer
Reviewed
Scholarly
Journals
Trade
Publications
Secondary
Data
Sources
Popular Media
Outlets
Internet
Citations
and End
References
Always cited in
text with
extensive
reference section
of many other
scholarly sources
Sporadic, some
may contain
citation, but not
all
Original
citations only
(the study
itself)
Usually, no
citations
Usually, no
citations
Tone of the
Writing
Very formal,
academic, with
no slang or
jargon
Specialized
language
written in
conversational
tone with many
examples of
jargon and
technical words
Graphs,
charts,
statistical
analysis in a
formal tone
Everyday
language
appealing to
the general
public
Everyday
language
appealing to the
main-stream
public
Appearance Very serious
appearance,
black and white
text, figures,
graphs and
charts and
occasionally, a
picture No
advertisements
(i.e. BORING)
Many pictures,
different sized
fonts, glossy
colored photos,
exciting and
action pictures
Look for
advertisements
relating to
equipment or
support
companies
Serious
appearance,
black and
white text,
multiple and
elaborate
tables and
graphs
Many advertise-
ments, very
colorful, and
multiple topics
Popups and
otherwise
Many advertise-
ments, very
colorful, and
multiple topics
Popups and
otherwise
Differentiating and Identifying Peer Reviewed Journal Articles from Other Sources.
Page 3 of 3
Peer
Reviewed
Scholarly
Journals
Trade
Publications
Secondary Data
Sources
Popular Media
Outlets
Internet
Who are the
Publishers?
University and
professional
organizations or
academic press
Professional
Organizations
(e.g. FBI
Journal,
International
Association of
Police Chiefs,
etc.)
Federal and
State Justice
Department
publications
Some private
groups
Companies
commercial or
non-profit
Organizations or
unknown sources
Examples Journal of
Criminal Justice,
International
Journal of Law,
Journal of
Criminal Justice
Educators
Police, FBI
Journal,
International
Association of
Police Chiefs,
Law and Order
Sourcebook of
Criminal Justice,
U.S. Census
Data, State or
Local Police
Datum
Time,
Newsweek
Reader’s
Digest
Wikipedia, U-
tube,
Forensics for
Dummies,
Agency Websites,
and many others
End of Table