Who's Nelson

1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

74.00%

3

Satisfactory

79.00%

4

Good

87.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

70.0 %

Content

25.0 %

Principles of Servant Leadership

Principles of servant leadership employed by the leader are not included.

Principles of servant leadership employed by the leader are incomplete or incorrect.

Principles of servant leadership employed by the leader are included but lack explanation.

Principles of servant leadership employed by the leader are complete and include clear explanation.

Principles of servant leadership employed by the leader are extremely through with precise explanation.

25.0 %

Examples Illustrating Application of Servant Leadership Principles

Examples illustrating the application of servant leadership principles are not included.

Examples illustrating the application of servant leadership principles are incomplete or incorrect.

Examples illustrating the application of servant leadership principles are included but lack relevant details.

Examples illustrating the application of servant leadership principles are complete and include relevant details.

Examples illustrating the application of servant leadership principles are thoroughly explained and extremely detailed.

10.0 %

Inspiring Followership

Discussion of the unique way the leader inspires followership is not included.

Discussion of the unique way the leader inspires followership is incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of the unique way the leader inspires followership is included but lacks supporting details.

Discussion of the unique way the leader inspires followership is complete and includes relevant supporting details.

Discussion of the unique way the leader inspires followership is extremely well articulated and supported with extensive details.

10.0 %

Qualities to Emulate

Discussion of leadership qualities you would seek to emulate is not included.

Discussion of leadership qualities you would seek to emulate is incomplete.

Discussion of leadership qualities you would seek to emulate is included but lacks supporting detail and explanation.

Discussion of leadership qualities you would seek to emulate is complete and includes supporting details and full explanation.

Discussion of leadership qualities you would seek to emulate is thorough and includes precise explanation and details for personal application.

20.0 %

Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %

Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %

Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %

Format

5.0 %

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %

Total Weightage