W3A1
Assignment 1: The Scavenger Hunt
Due Week 3 and worth 100 points
Let’s put your investigative skills to work! In this assignment, visit the Strayer online library located in iCampus or the Resource Center tab in Blackboard and find four (4) peer-reviewed quantitative or qualitative articles related to your topic. Read each article.
My study is about what factors weigh on the decision of college students to attend college at home and reside with parents or to go off to college and live on campus. The new environment that is faced when being introduced to college is balanced highly on the student’s social foundation and social support. My research will review how dependent students are on this and how heavily various factors weigh on the decision to stay home vs venturing out to an out of town college. I would also like to determine, based on studies if one choice or the other negatively effects a student’s freshman experience.
Write a three to five (3-5) page paper in which you:
1. Summarize each article [approximately one to two (1-2) paragraphs per article] and identify the:
a. Purpose of the research.
b. Problem statement.
c. Gaps in literature that studied the problem.
d. Research question and/or hypotheses.
e. Theory or conceptual framework.
f. Findings of the research.
2. Describe one to two (1-2) aspects of each article that are relevant to the research topic you have chosen.
3. Provide a preliminary reference page in APA format of the articles you summarized.
4. Include at least four (4) peer-reviewed quantitative or qualitative articles related to your topic.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
· Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
· Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
· Identify a research topic and describe why it can and should be studied.
· Determine the appropriateness of peer-reviewed literature to support research topics.
· Use technology and information resources to research issues related to educational research methods.
· Use quantitative and / or qualitative approaches to create research topics.
· Analyze research methodologies that support specific research topics.
· Describe ethical considerations in the research process.
· Evaluate components of a research proposal.
· Write clearly and concisely about educational research methods using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 100 | Assignment 1: The Scavenger Hunt | |||
Criteria | Unacceptable Below 70% F | Fair 70-79% C | Proficient 80-89% B | Exemplary 90-100% A |
1. Summarize each article and identify the purpose of the research, problem statement, gaps in literature that studied the problem, research question and/or hypotheses, theory or conceptual framework, and findings of the research. Weight: 45% | Did not submit or incompletely summarized each article and identified the purpose of the research, problem statement, gaps in literature that studied the problem, research question and/or hypotheses, theory or conceptual framework, and findings of the research. | Partially summarized each article and identified the purpose of the research, problem statement, gaps in literature that studied the problem, research question and/or hypotheses, theory or conceptual framework, and findings of the research. | Satisfactorily summarized each article and identified the purpose of the research, problem statement, gaps in literature that studied the problem, research question and/or hypotheses, theory or conceptual framework, and findings of the research. | Thoroughly summarized each article and identified the purpose of the research, problem statement, gaps in literature that studied the problem, research question and/or hypotheses, theory or conceptual framework, and findings of the research. |
2. Describe one to two (1-2) aspects of each article that are relevant to the research topic you have chosen. | Did not submit or incompletely described one to two (1-2) aspects of each article that are relevant to the research topic you have chosen. | Partially described one to two (1-2) aspects of each article that are relevant to the research topic you have chosen. | Satisfactorily described one to two (1-2) aspects of each article that are relevant to the research topic you have chosen. | Thoroughly described one to two (1-2) aspects of each article that are relevant to the research topic you have chosen. |
3. 4 references Weight: 5% | No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
4. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting Weight: 5% | Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. | Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. | Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. | Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
5. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section Weight: 5% | Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. | In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. | Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style. | In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. |
6. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources Weight: 5% | Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. | Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. | Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. | Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. |
7. Clarity and Coherence of Writing Weight: 5% | Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. | Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. | Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. | Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. |
8 years ago
15
Purchase the answer to view it

- hm339_2.docx
- BAM411 FINAL
- team busproject
- Assignment for Kim
- .....
- Write a 350- to 700-word paper in which you differentiate between valuation, depreciation, amortization, and depletion. Is it appropriate to calculate depreciation using two different methods? Why?
- NTC362 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment- Analog and Digital Comparison Paper
- MKT-607 Module 7 DQ 2 - Think of two creative ideas for services to be provided by the grocery……
- Assignment - Eastern and Western Philosophers Comparison Paper
- Need Help
- FOOD SAFETY IN CHINA AND HOW IT AFFECTS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS