There are two different discussion questions.write 300–500 words that respond to the following questions for each question with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates.

Discussion Question #1

Answer the following questions to complete discussion question #1.

• Explain why Aaron Feuerstein felt his decisions were necessary for his company and for his employees. 
• Discuss the pros and cons of Aaron Feuerstein's decision making, and explain if or how you would have handled his situation differently if you were in his shoes. 
• Apply virtue ethics and corporate social responsibility to his situation.

Article to use for discussion question #1

http://ethix.org/2011/06/25/was-aaron-feuerstein-wrong

https://toughsledding.wordpress.com/2010/03/05/putting-people-before-profits-classic-pr-case-study-but-without-the-fairytale-ending/

Discussion Qestion # 2

Answer the following questions to complete discussion question #2

• Why do you think there is such disparity of pay between men and women? 
• Does the disparity of pay violate the utilitarianism view? Why or why not? 
• Do you feel that the Lilly Ledbetter Act will help to decrease the disparity between men and women? Why? 
• What are some of the roadblocks that many women face today to get equal pay?

Articles to use for discussion questions #2

https://nwlc.org/resources/lilly-ledbetter-fair-pay-act/

http://sundial.csun.edu/2013/03/lilly-ledbetter-shares-her-story-of-overcoming-the-wage-gap/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2013/09/19/the-geography-of-the-gender-pay-gap-womens-earnings-by-state/2/#5b0c1ea658a8

http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/12/11/on-pay-gap-millennial-women-near-parity-for-now/

If you have any questions please let me know.