statistics/probability

profilematias1

Jackson County judges try thousands of cases per year. In an overwhelming majority of the cases disposed, the verdict stands as rendered. However, some cases are appealed, and of those appealed, some of the cases are reversed. Jackie Chan of The Star Tribune conducted a study of cases handled by Jackson County judges over a three-year period. In the Excel file, Judges, linked at the bottom of the page, are the results for the 182,908 cases handled (disposed) by 40 judges in Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Court, and Municipal Court.

The purpose of the newspaper's study was to evaluate the performance of the judges. The newspaper wanted to know which judges were doing a good job and which ones were making too many mistakes. You are to assist in the data analysis by using your knowledge of probability and conditional probability to help with the ranking of each of the judges, as well as each court.

Managerial Report
Prepare a report (see below) with your ranking of the judges based on the probabilities and conditional probabilities, as well as the analysis of each court. Include the following seven (7) items in table format to support your ranking. Be sure to use five (5) decimal places for your probabilities in the table, as some of them will be quite small.

The probability of cases being appealed in each of the three different courts.

The probability of cases being reversed in each of the three different courts.

The probability of cases being reversed given an appeal in each of the three different courts.

The probability of a case being appealed for each judge.

The probability of a case being reversed for each judge.

The probability of reversal, given an appeal for each judge.

Rank the judges within each court for each of the probabilities in 4 - 6. In other words, only rank the judges in the Common Pleas court against the other judges in the Common Pleas court. perfrom the same analysis for the other two courts. Then, within each court, find the sum of the ranks and get an overall ranking for each judge. Evaluate and discuss the meaning of your results. Use tables, charts, graphs, or visual dashboards to support your findings.

Your report must contain the following:

A title page in APA style.

An introduction that summarizes the problem.

The body of the paper should answer the questions posed in the problem by communicating the results of your analysis. Include results of calculations, as well as charts and graphs, where appropriate.

A conclusion paragraph that addresses your findings and what you have determined from the data and your analysis.

Submit your Excel file in addition to your report.

CourtJudgeDisposedAppealedReversedP(Appeal)Rank by P(A)P(Reversal)Rank by P(R)P(R|A)Rank by P(R|A)Sum of RanksOverall Rank
Common PleasPeter Tom32522119        
 Angela M. Mazzarelli4523235        
 Richard T. Andrias5231618        
 David Friedman3215334        
 John W. Sweeny Jr.34521452        
 Rolando T. Acosta3431648        
 David B. Saxe1236463        
 Karla Moskowitz3211745        
 Dianne T. Renwick12571232        
 Leland G. DeGrasse1537537        
 Helen E. Freedman10542163        
 Rosalyn H. Richter21763622        
 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels15674331        
 Paul G. Feinman216426253        
 Judith J. Gische268619712        
 Darcel D. Clark395317525        
 Total           
             
Domestic RelationsJohn A. Lahtinen8362433        
 Leslie E. Stein6572216        
 William E. McCarthy932183        
 Edward O. Spain6244345        
 Total           
             
MunicipalElizabeth A. Garry3542316        
 John C. Egan Jr.32852334        
 Peter Tom8757387        
 Angela M. Mazzarelli346373        
 Richard T. Andrias7424451        
 David Friedman9345323        
 John W. Sweeny Jr.7533845        
 Rolando T. Acosta5764437        
 David B. Saxe582233        
 Karla Moskowitz363175        
 Dianne T. Renwick564550        
 Leland G. DeGrasse6434343        
 Helen E. Freedman345382        
 Rosalyn H. Richter3521456        
 Sallie Manzanet-Daniels6757527        
 Paul G. Feinman127343        
 Judith J. Gische675391        
 Darcel D. Clark982563        
 Luis A. Gonzalez3421122        
 Leslie E. Stein2816123        
 Total           
             
      

 

    • 9 years ago
    • 30
    Answer(6)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    • attachment
      question_2_judges.xlsx

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      jackson_county_judges.doc
    • attachment
      jackson_county_judges.xls

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      copy_of_judges.xlsx
    • attachment
      part1.docx

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      mth_410_mod_03_option__1-jackson_county_judges.docx
    • attachment
      mth_410_mod_03_option__1-jackson_county_judges.xlsx

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      15_jackson_county_judges.xlsx

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      statistics_class_-_probability_and_conditional_probability.docx
    Bids(0)