Short Paper
murtazACC 207 Module Five Case Study Analysis Rubric
Prompt: Create a short case study report summarizing your research of a reimbursement-related contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor. Your report should include the following: the reason for and nature of the contract, a summary of the outcome of the dispute, and a conclusion presenting your overall analysis of the allegations, dispute, and outcome.
Format: This short paper assignment should follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA style. Page length requirements: 1-–2 pages, not including the cover page or the reference page. Failure to adhere to these submission requirements of submission will result in the inappropriate components not being graded.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find feedback in the Grade Center or Turnitin.
Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
Dispute | Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides specific and relevant details to support explanation
(18-20) | Accurately identifies and explains a contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor (16-17) | Does not sufficiently explain
(14-15) | Does not correctly identify a contract dispute between the U.S. government and a contractor
(0-13) | 20 |
Outcome
| Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides relevant details to support the reason for the outcome (27-30) | Accurately describes the outcome of the contract dispute
(24-26) | Does not sufficiently describe the outcome of the contract dispute
(21-23) | Does not correctly describe the outcome of the contract dispute
(0-20) | 30 |
Conclusions | Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses clear and relevant examples to support the implications for reimbursement contracts (27-30) | Analyzes the contract dispute and explains its implications for reimbursement contracts
(24-26) | Analyzes the contract dispute but does not sufficiently explain the implications for reimbursement contracts
(21-23) | Does not analyze the contract dispute and its implications
(0-20) | 30 |
Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (18-20) | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
(16-17) | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (14-15) | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
(0-14) | 20 |
Earned Total Comments: | 100% | ||||
12 years ago
35
Purchase the answer to view it
case_study_on_dispute.doc
- For Brookstar
- Only a handful of cases result in a jury trial. Outline the steps involved in a criminal trial. Why do...
- write a letter to your mp in protest about the workhouses
- Expert Answers
- The following unadjusted trial balance is for Adams Construction Co. as of the end of its 2005 fiscal year. The June
- Business Law
- finc 600 week 2
- measurement and decision making
- FIVE PAGES
- ORGANISATION STRUCTURE PAPER
