scenario planning
SuperClass(Scenario Planning) Marking Criteria
________________________________________
________________________________________
Criteria | HD | D | C | P | MF | F |
The quality and completeness of response to the topic (12 Marks) § The report shows knowledge of relevant strategic management theory, in particular it covers the followings: o Identification and justification for a range of the future trends o Identification and justification for the future uncertainties o Explanation of the scope of the exercise o Identification of stakeholders o Use of a correlation matrix to determine any influences between the uncertainties; if there are no such influences, an explanation for this effect o Development of a vivid picture of the two or three contrasting scenarios o Explanation of consistency and plausibility of the scenarios o Implication for the business organisation under each the scenarios § The argument is incisive and includes a concise, relevant treatment of the issues. § The depth and clarity of analysis § The conclusion demonstrates a plausible, insightful, and rationally persuasive point at which to end the argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence of appropriate reading (5 Marks) § The topic is discussed using theoretical frames of strategic management. § The discussions are supported by the use of at least 2 primary sources (e.g. refereed journal articles) and at least 3 high quality professional, company or media sources that are directly relevant to the topic chosen § Makes limited use of textbook (or other text books), relying on primary sources to support their argument. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity of expression and Overall presentation (3 Marks) § The report is succinctly and clearly written § Sources are referenced consistently and comprehensively using the recommended referencing system as prescribed in the course description/outline § Use of language appropriate to professional/academic writing Presentation is professional (e.g. spell and grammar checked, judicious use of headings, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL (20 marks) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penalties § Poor presentation (up to 5 marks) § Late: Date received (5% of the possible mark, per day) § Failure to adequately reference is plagiarism. Plagiarism will be dealt with in line with university policy. |
|
| ||||
TOTAL MARKS OBTAINED FOR ASSESSMENT |
|
| ||||
Grade |
|
| ||||
10 years ago
Purchase the answer to view it

- scenario_planning.docx