Revision of a literature review of Sustainable Business Development

Please revise the attached revision paper based on the comments on it and the instructions below:

• Do we see debate in the literature review? Does that debate get resolved in some cogent way (and remember, in an emerging field of knowledge, there are multiple resolutions possible: one approach wins, no approaches win (and we need new, further research that the review can specify), a combination of approaches wins)? Is that debate and resolution well-articulated on the page? 

• If you are writing a literature review, I hope you have found authoritative sources of knowledge; have taken specific and strategic elements of knowledge from each source; have put those elements into coherent relation (assimilation)--which, in an emerging field of knowledge, will be some form of debate; and have worked to offer your judgment on the significance of that relation (synthesis)--which in an emerging field of knowledge, will resolve that debate (is there a winner? no winner? should positions in the debate be combined in some specific, strategic fashion? should, because specific questions are unresolved, specific further research should be done, in order to pick a winner?). This is challenging work. If you are penetrating an emerging field of knowledge in your strongest fashion, there will be complexity; it's unlikely that one approach is best and so unlikely that the debate among sources has a clear, simple winner. 

   

  • I also attached a checklist of the literature review, please follow the structure of it to revise the paper. (you need to add an abstract and an acknowledgement)