resrearch

Hi,I would like to do a paper review that is going to be short essay (3–4 pages) and single space on this article and each question should have a paragraph

http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/spanner-osdi2012.pdf

Following these steps:

1.summary:Give a brief summary of the work by your own word

• What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?

• What are the claimed contributions of the paper?

• How do the authors substantiate their claims?

• What are the conclusions?

2. evaluating :

 Evaluate the work by answering these question :

• Is the research problem significant?

• Are the contributions significant?

• Are the claims valid?

   

   

  3.Synthesis : generate any interesting thought you have on the work by consulting the following question:

   

• What is the crux of the research problem?

• What are some alternative approaches to address the research problem?

• What is a better way to substantiate the claim of the authors?

• What is a good argument against the case made by the authors?

• How can the research results be improved?

• Can the research results be applied to another context?

• What are the open problems raised by this work?

• Bottom-line: Can we do better than the authors?

Hi,I would like to do a paper review that is going to be short essay (3–4 pages) and single space on this article and each question should have a paragraph

http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/spanner-osdi2012.pdf

Following these steps:

1.summary:Give a brief summary of the work by your own word

• What is the research problem the paper attempts to address?

• What are the claimed contributions of the paper?

• How do the authors substantiate their claims?

• What are the conclusions?

2. evaluating :

 Evaluate the work by answering these question :

• Is the research problem significant?

• Are the contributions significant?

• Are the claims valid?

   

   

  3.Synthesis : generate any interesting thought you have on the work by consulting the following question:

   

• What is the crux of the research problem?

• What are some alternative approaches to address the research problem?

• What is a better way to substantiate the claim of the authors?

• What is a good argument against the case made by the authors?

• How can the research results be improved?

• Can the research results be applied to another context?

• What are the open problems raised by this work?

• Bottom-line: Can we do better than the authors?