| | | | | |
| Criteria | | | | |
|---|
| Introduction is engaging and provides a strong and focused thesis. Conclusion provides strong sense of closure. | Introduction is engaging and establishes a functional thesis. Conclusion provides general sense of closure. | Introduction is uninteresting, unclear, or lacks a clear thesis. Conclusion is vague or underdeveloped. Essay lacks clear closure. | Introduction and/or conclusion are non-existent. |
|---|
| Paper displays clear and intentional organization. Essay is engaging and purposeful. | Clear consideration has been given to organization. Overall flow is strong. | Occasional lapses in focus and/or coherence. Paper jumps around without clear sense of direction. | No clear method of organization. |
|---|
| Argument is well developed. Claims are clear and paper stays focused on proving a specific point. | Argument is established. A majority of claims support the overall point. A few lapses in focus or clarity. | Overall argument is hazy. A number of claims lack focus or do not help prove the paper's general or specific point. | Paper is missing argument. Claims are not established or there is no specific purpose to paper. |
|---|
| Strong examples, quotes, sources logically connect to claims and argument. Evidence smoothly integrated. | Good examples, quotes, and sources support claims and argument. Integration of evidence could be improved. | Examples, quotes, and sources are present but may be underused or do not logically support claims and argument. Clear holes in evidence. | Evidence is missing or does not connect to claims and argument. |
|---|
| Strong analysis of sources, examples, and evidence that clearly connects back to argument. Analysis shows thoughtful and logical consideration. | Analysis logically connects examples, sources, and evidence to argument. Some points may be too general or lack depth but a majority of the analysis is strong. | A significant amount of the analysis is too general or lacks depth. Does not provide logical connection back to argument. | Analysis is missing or does not connect back to the argument. |
|---|
| Paper is free of grammatical or spelling errors. | Grammatical and spelling errors are rare and do not detract from paper. | Noticeable grammatical and spelling errors that compromise paper's overall quality. | Excessive grammatical or spelling errors that make paper nearly unreadable. |
|---|
| Student worked with tutor in Writing Center and attached signature sheet to their draft. | Student worked with tutor in Writing Center and attached signature sheet to their draft. | Student did not meet with tutor in Writing Center or attach a signature sheet to their draft. | Student did not meet with tutor in Writing Center or attach a signature sheet to their draft. |
|---|
| Overall Score | | | | |
|---|
| | | | | |
|---|