Read the instructions first/A+ work

profileEbell4395
Home>Homework Answsers>Business & Finance homework help>Operations Management homework help
 
 
 

Company size standards should be based on the number of employees to determine whether it is small, medium or large.

 

Project Two: (Week Six)

 

Required Elements of Project Two:

 

·         Research prominent business leaders and their views on the leadership skills needed for the 21st century. 

·         Select at least one large corporation leader, one medium sized, and one small business leader and compare and contrast their view points.

·         Evaluate the remarks of the leaders with respect to leadership styles, skills, and business landscape of the future.  Include comments on the topics discussed in weeks four through and six as well.

 

Required Formatting of Project Two:

  • This paper should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and four to five pages in length excluding the title page and reference page;
  • Title page;
  • Introductory paragraph and a summary paragraph;
  • Use headings;
  • Write in the third person;
  • Use at least six sources from both the class material and outside sources.
  • Use APA formatting for in-text citations and a reference page.  You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes. Deductions will be taken when quotes are used and found to be unnecessary;
  • Submit the paper in the Assignment Folder.
 

 

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (20%)

 
      
Criteria

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; provides thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist

demonstrated full understanding of requirements; responded to each aspect of assignment

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

failed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

no APA style errors

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

no attempt at APA style

Overall Score
      
    • 11 years ago
    • 20
    Report issue
    Answer(1)
    profile
    Prof. Dan.
    4.7 (1k+)
    4.7 (45)
    Chat

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      leadership_views_1.docx
    Bids(1)