| | | | | | |
| Criteria | Outstanding | Superior | Good | Substandard | Failure |
|---|
| Critical Thinking/Reasoning | 12.25 points
demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions | 10.41 points
shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions | 9.19 points
shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion | 7.96 points
shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions | 6.74 points
lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims |
|---|
| Application of Concepts/Development | 12.25 points
arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts | 10.41 points
arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts | 9.19 points
arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material | 7.96 points
arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material | 6.74 points
a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist |
|---|
| Attention to Instructions | 5.25 points
demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment | 4.46 points
demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment | 3.94 points
demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment | 3.41 points
failed to show a firm understanding of requirement; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment | 2.89 points
did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements |
|---|
| Clarity; including grammar | 3.5 points
writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability | 2.98 points
most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues | 2.63 points
wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar | 2.28 points
unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues | 1.93 points
largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure |
|---|
| Adherence to APA Style (6th ed.) | 1.75 points
| 1.49 points
attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present | 1.31 points
attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document | 1.14 points
attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other | 0.96 points
|
|---|
| Overall Score | Outstanding
31.5 or more | Superior
28 or more | Good
24.5 or more | Substandard
2 |
|---|