Case Study paper

Instructions ( case study attached)

Case Study #3:  The Four Functions of Management (35%)

Students will read the case study that focuses on the four functions of management: planning, organizing, leading and controlling (P-O-L-C).  You have been hired as a consultant to help Carl Thomas and his family to solve the problems with his business. You will create a management plan that covers the four functions of management.  In creating the management plan, you must also demonstrate how the four functions of management are interrelated showing how issues in one function impact other functions. 

 

In speaking with Carl, Joe and John, you already know the following about the business owners:

 

  1. failed to develop or share a mission statement;
  2. failed to determine the best way to organize resources, including personnel;
  3. underestimates the importance of recruitment, job design and descriptions, and training;
  4. assumed that motivation will occur naturally;
  5. fails to define standards and other measurable outcomes;
  6. ignored negative information;
  7. delayed actions to improve organizational outcomes.

 

Resource that will help you develop the mini-management plan:

 

How to Make a Management Plan

http://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/leadership/effective-manager/management-plan/main

 

Required Elements of the Management Plan

 

Students will create a management plan that helps Carl, Joe and John run the business, both day-to-day and over the long term (strategically).  Be sure to be succinct in your writing but persuasive so that the recommendations will have positive outcomes for the business.

 

  • In creating the management plan, students will first assess the business and identify specific areas of strengths and weaknesses of the business as it relates to the components of the P-O-L-C;
  • Select  a management model (class hierarchy, democratic hierarchy, collaborative management or collective management) and explain why the selected model is most appropriate for Outdoor Adventure Paintball Park;
  • Develop roles and responsibility of the owners and employees (Be creative in completing this task);
  • Make specific recommendations for improving the management of Outdoor Adventure Paintball Park.  Cover all aspects of the P-O-L-C.  This area of the paper specifically addresses the areas of strengths and weaknesses identified above and puts in place a plan for the short and long –term success of the business;
  • Create a balanced scorecard that will help Outdoor Adventure Paintball Park align its business activities to the vision and strategy of the organization, improves communication and monitors performance against goals;
  • Students are expected to show what they have learned in the course by applying theories and concepts.  Be sure to support your reasoning.

Required Formatting of Management:

 

  • The management plan should be double-spaced, 12-point font, and between 6-8 pages in length excluding the title page and reference page.
  • Title page with your name, the course name, the date, and the instructor’s name.
  • An introductory paragraph, a summary paragraph and the use of headings are required;
  • Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference page.  You are expected to paraphrase and not use quotes other than in identifying the mission statement and vision statement.
  • Write in the third person;
  • Submit paper in the Assignment Folder.

 

Due Date 
Mar 8, 2015 11:59 PM

Rubric Name: Written Assignment (35%)

 
      
CriteriaOutstandingSuperiorGoodSubstandardFailure
Critical Thinking/Reasoning12.25 points

demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking, is consistent in accurately interpreting questions & material; provides solid assumptions, reasoning & claims; thorough analysis & evaluation with sound conclusions

10.41 points

shows good critical thinking; accurately interprets most questions & material; usually identifies relevant arguments/reasoning/claims; offers good analysis & evaluation with fairly sound conclusions

9.19 points

shows occasional critical thinking; questions & material is at times accurately interpreted; arguments/reasoning/claims are occasionally explained; offers fair analysis & evaluation with a conclusion

7.96 points

shows little critical thinking, misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates; justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions

6.74 points

lacks critical thinking consistently offers biased interpretations; ignores or superficially evaluates; argues using poor reasoning, and/or unwarranted claims

Application of Concepts/Development12.25 points

arguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the readings/experience; ideas go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts

10.41 points

arguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from the readings and course content; ideas presented demonstrate student’s understanding of the material and concepts

9.19 points

arguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in the readings of material or external sources of material

7.96 points

arguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; student may resort to ad hominem attacks on the author instead of making meaningful application of the material

6.74 points

a meaningful attempt to explain or support ideas does not exist

Attention to Instructions5.25 points

demonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment

4.46 points

demonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment

3.94 points

demonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment

3.41 points

failed to show a firm understanding of requirement; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment

2.89 points

did not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements

Clarity; including grammar3.5 points

writing is clear and easy to follow; grammar and spelling are all correct; formatting gives a professional look and adds to readability

2.98 points

most ideas are presented clearly; occasional spelling and/or grammar issues

2.63 points

wordy; some points require rereading to understand fully; more than an occasional spelling and/or grammar

2.28 points

unclear and difficult to understand; frequent spelling and grammar issues

1.93 points

largely incomprehensible writing/poorly written in terms of mechanics and structure

Adherence to APA Style (6th ed.)1.75 points

no APA style errors

1.49 points

attempts in-text citation and reference list but 1 or 2 APA style errors are present

1.31 points

attempts in-text citation and reference list; APA style errors are present; inconsistencies in citation usage can be found throughout the document

1.14 points

attempts either in-text citation or reference list but omits the other

0.96 points

no attempt at APA style

Overall ScoreOutstanding

31.5 or more
Superior

28 or more
Good

24.5 or more
Substandard

2
  • 10 years ago
ANSWER
NOT RATED

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
  • attachment
    case_study_3__the_four_functions_of_management.docx