Psychology Paper and Podcast

profileshaebee37

Attached you will find the completed paper you are more than welcome to make changes as you see fit, Your primary job is take the paper and make the podcast

The class project for this course is a written report, accompanied by a PowerPoint or podcast presentation, that addresses the biological study of a specific behavioral or mental phenomenon (normal or pathological) covered in the readings and videos. Please select a behavioral or mental phenomenon such as language or schizophrenia and then select a biological strategy for investigating it, such as hormonal or genetic mechanisms, neurotransmitters, drug treatments, or localization of brain processes by imaging. Your written portion will be worth a maximum of 50 points, and the PowerPoint or podcast that accompanies it will be worth a maximum of 10 points. Thus, the project as a whole will be worth 60 points.

Written paper. As an example, the theme of your report might be imaging approaches to the study of schizophrenia. Your paper should summarize fundamental issues, questions, and controversies and provide a general overview of the topic using the biological line of investigation you chose. It should also elaborate on your understanding of the brain processes that are revealed through imaging research in schizophrenia. To accomplish this, you will have to use recent research articles (published within the last five years) to illustrate relevant points. You may use any of a number of electronic databases to find research articles that deal with your topic, including the library and the Internet. The one requirement for the research articles that you select is that two of them must have appeared in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You may wish to consult with the library staff or your faculty member to confirm whether a particular journal is peer-reviewed. 

Newspaper or magazine articles should not be used as your major reference, but they are sometimes useful when they lead you to the appropriate research article. You should avoid simply repeating the articles in summary form, but rather use them within the text of your paper to illustrate important points. You are welcome to discuss your choice of topic with your faculty member to make sure you are on the right track. 

Your paper should be 1,600 words, or about 6 to 8 pages, in length (use the word count as a guide to length).  It must be typed, double-spaced, with one-inch margins, and fully referenced in APA format (seehttp://www.apa.org).   Please check the course schedule in this syllabus for the due date. The penalty for a late project is ten percent of the score on the project.

The text of your paper should be preceded by an abstract (about 100 words) that summarizes the key points in the paper (i.e., statement of problem, major findings, conclusions). Please post your abstract in the Weekly Bulletin Board conference for other class members to read, and respond to their abstracts for a stimulating discussion.

You may wish to submit a draft of your complete or near complete paper to the Effective Writing Center (EWC at http://www.umuc.edu/writingcenter/writingresources/faq.cfm ) for review and comment, prior to the due date of the paper. This should be submitted well in advance of the due date, in order for the EWC to respond and for you to make the necessary corrections. Once you receive feedback from the EWC, you can copy and paste it into a Word Document, then post it in your assignment folder with your project paper by the due date, for your instructor to view as necessary. The EWC can help address questions regarding format, structure, writing style, and appropriateness of references.

PowerPoint presentation. The PowerPoint presentation should summarize and illustrate the topic of your written paper. The main purpose of this is to familiarize you with the most widely used state-of-the-art presentation form, to augment information in the paper, and to share your work with other class members. The PowerPoint presentation should consist of a minimum of 6 slides of the area in your written report. If you do not have access to PowerPoint, you may use free, publicly available software such as Prezi or Open Office Impress instead.  

Consider the following tips in preparing your presentation:

  1. your first or second slide should be an outline of the presentation in which you identify main points and then follow the order of your outline for the rest of the presentation
  2. there should be about four or five points per slide
  3. use a standard font (Times Roman or Arial) and at least an 18-point font size with different sized fonts for main points and secondary points
  4. use a font color that contrasts sharply with the background
  5. use graphs rather than charts and words, and always title your graphs
  6. proof your slides for spelling and grammatical errors
  7. use a conclusion slide to summarize the main points of your presentation and to suggest future avenues of research

8.avoid ending your presentation abruptly—you might end your slide with a quote, a simple question, or the next steps 

Podcast presentation. The podcast should be targeted to the public and should summarize and discuss the topic of your written paper. It should not be a verbatim reading of your paper. You will record your spoken comments with a microphone and audio software, then upload your audio file to class. You will need to create an audio story (approaching it the same way you would any other story or essay) on your paper topic. The podcast should be in MP3 format of five minutes' length or 5 mB file size. You may download free audio recording software athttp://audacity.sourceforge.net/ . See the Weekly Bulletin Board conference for tips on how to make and use podcasts.

Please note: The class project will be used to fulfill a requirement within the Senior Seminar in Psychology (PSYC 495) capstone course, not only for students who have matriculated under the 2011-2012 catalog who are required to take this course but for others for whom it is an elective. Please retain an electronic version of the graded project that you can submit when required during the capstone coursework.

Grading Rubric for Project: Written Paper

 

5

4

3

2

1

0

CONTENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

1. All topics were discussed in clear detail.

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Author supported assertions correctly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Ideas were inter-related coherently and logically.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Author creatively enhances the topic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

ORGANIZATION

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. An introduction previews main points of study

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Body of paper develops and elaborates main ideas.

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. A conclusion summarizes main points.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WRITING MECHANICS and STYLE

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Paper free of mechanical errors (e.g., misspellings, typos, etc.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. Paper grammatically sound (proper sentence structure)

 

 

 

 

 

 

10. Citations and references in proper style (e.g., APA).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grading Rubric for Project: Podcast (Audacity or substitute)

 

2

1

0

Information Content

Describes the topic fully and accurately

Describes the topic superficially or incorrectly

Description fails to correspond to the written description

Technical

Volume, transitions, and noise are effectively controlled

Uneven control of sound that occasionally interferes with clarity

Missing intervals or unintelligible sound recording

Creativity

Narrative enhanced with special effects throughout the delivery

Narrative exhibits momentary enhancement

Narrative lacks creative enhancement

Spoken production

Clear, well-rehearsed delivery

Unrehearsed or unclear delivery

Unintelligible enunciation

Relevance

Meets requirements of the assignment in length or size

Comes acceptably close to meeting the requirements of the assignment

Varies widely from the assigned requirements

 

Grading Rubric for Project: Slide Presentation (PowerPoint or substitute)

 

2

1

0

Introduction

Topic, author, and date are clearly indicated

Introduction lacks some important information

Introduction is missing

Layout

Visually pleasing, with appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space

Appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or uses a distracting background

Confusing or unreadable

Text

Readable text with good placement and appropriate typeface.

Lengthy, busy, or full of distracting and inappropriate embellishments

Missing, unreadable or inappropriate text

Creative enhancements

Graphics effectively supplement text

Graphics present, but irrelevant or inappropriately used

No enhancements

Relevance

Meets requirements of the assignment in length or size

Comes acceptably close to meeting the requirements of the assignment

Varies widely from the assigned requirements

PROJECT RESOURCES

Resources for a slide presentation

The class project described in the Syllabus is a written paper accompanied by either PowerPoint slides or a podcast. In this topic we’ll take a look at PowerPoint. If you haven’t used it before, of course your first question will be “What is PowerPoint?”. It is versatile software from Microsoft that is used to present text and graphics in slides. You can buy it at a student discount from UMUC. There is also free software that will do much the same job, sometimes in a different way. 

If you prefer to buy the software, here's how. Go to UMUC 360 Support and log in to the MyUMUC website (or start here if you want) and click on the Student Portal link. Then click on the MyUMUC Resources link and select “Educational Software”. With the “Students” tab selected, explore software listings for Microsoft Office and PowerPoint. Microsoft Office is a software suite that includes PowerPoint and other products. Follow directions to purchase by download or DVD.  

There are versions of PowerPoint for the Mac and the PC. PowerPoint 2007 and PowerPoint 2010 (or 2011 for the Mac) are in wide use, so instructions for both versions are available. That means that you may have to make allowances for differences between a tutorial and the version you are using. See if the following tutorials can get you on your feet fast. 

If you prefer the free route, you may download a PowerPoint clone such as OpenOffice Impress from this site and find their other products here.   

Among the free options, a newly popular presentation tool is Prezi, which strikes some users as simpler and more entertaining. It's available at http://prezi.com/. An educational free account is available to anyone with a university email account. (UMUC makes these available for free here.) Learn it in an afternoon and use it like a pro! Although it’s not hard to learn, there are a number of things you can do with it, so tutorials may be useful. You may want to look at some of these.  

For further help, try the forums for PowerPoint and Prezi users: 

If you use an alternative to PowerPoint, please include a note in your upload to tell me which software you used. The project assignment in the Syllabus will ask you to turn in at least six slides. The grading rubric will give you some ideas of what to include in your presentation.  

If you have trouble getting started, give some thought to a strategy. Here are seven styles for presentation that may give you an idea. The assertion-evidence style has attracted interest in scientific and medical presentations. Some people go even deeper, but you don't really have to match the profound meditators on the subject. If all you want are tipshintstools, and reminders, you're on your way.

These examples may indicate what not to do. Have fun!

Resources for a podcast

The class project described in the Syllabus is a written paper accompanied by either PowerPoint slides or a podcast. In this topic we’ll take a look at podcasting. If this is new to you I would suggest browsing the websites below before installing and using Audacity. Doing it right the first time is by far the easiest path to success! 

Podcasts 

If you have not made a podcast before, welcome to sound communication on the Internet! It is probably familiar to you from a variety of sources. For example, here is the history of brain research in ten 15-minute podcasts that you could have made yourself with the techniques discussed below. To set the stage, you may be interested in the following answers to your question, “What is a podcast?”

Your podcast should have at least a length of five minutes or a file size of 5 mB in MP3 format. What is MP3? It’s explained at this site and at that one. Using Audacity software, each minute of monaural recorded speech in MP3 format occupies about 1 mB in file size.  

To make a podcast you will need a microphone connected to your computer (or look for free apps that will let you record a podcast on your iPhone or Android phone--or find a laptop with an internal microphone). I have found that the microphone included in my headset, Microsoft model LifeChat LX-3000, has been more than adequate. Some folks may prefer more or less than that, so here are some reviews and sources for equipment. I have no connection with any of the suppliers and of course I can't guarantee that your experience will be as rewarding as mine has been; but best wishes. (For shoppers, price alert services are becoming common but I haven't used them.)

Audacity

You’ll begin by downloading free Audacity software. Depending on the version you download, you may also need to download a free plug-in called “Lame MP3” to allow you to store your recording in MP3 format, so I’ve included information about that, too, which you’ll find at the following sites. 

Your first trial with Audacity should begin with your microphone installed and turned on, so that you can try out the suggestions from your tutors. I’d recommend browsing the sites below in order to gain familiarity with what you’ll be doing. 

For a quick production you'll record your podcast, save it, and upload it for class. For a little more polish, you might want to amplify, compress, or normalize your recording, as this video shows. Here's a faster route to the same goal. You can get Levelator here, learn more about it there, and find Audio Boo over there. You can pick up additional tips from this audio blog.

Is Audacity working for you now? Then you’re on your way. Here are some tutorials to help you to greater proficiency.

The following material is entirely optional. As you become familiar with Audacity you may become interested in special effects, like enhancing your voice or adding a music track to speech. Keep in mind that tutorials may vary in the version of Audacity that they use. You may have to make allowances for slight differences from your own version.

Audacity is not the only free tool for podcasting. PodproducerArdour, and Wildvoice Studio are available at no charge, but I don't know whether the software is kept current or how large its user base might be. Mac users may prefer GarageBand. I have not used any of these. 

For further help, try the forums for Audacity users:

What if nothing works for you? That’s unlikely to happen, but you may then wish to turn to a PowerPoint presentation as an alternative. That’s discussed in the next topic. But even if you can’t record a podcast for your class project, you aren’t forever barred from making sound presentations. The alternatives (not for class but for your own use) include 

Podcast hosting

Here's one thing you don't want to do. Otherwise, enjoy yourself! 

 

 

Rubric Name: Class Project

 
       
Criteria

All topics were discussed in clear detail.

Incomplete or unbalanced coverage in a few respects.

Content was often obscure, incomplete, or unbalanced.

 

Content varied from the assigned length substantially.

Content was often irrelevant or left large holes in continuity.

Coverage was irrelevant or nonexistent.

Author supported assertions correctly.

Insufficient appeals to evidence.

Inappropriate and insufficient use of evidence.

Excessive use of opinion and unsupported claims. Few citations of evidence.

Little or no use of evidence, or appeals to mere speculation.

Incorrect, nonexistent, or inappropriate support for assertions.

Ideas were inter-related coherently and logically.

Narrative was generally clear but points of interest or logic were not addressed.

Content was a serial list of poorly related topics.

Author’s point was often unclear, or paragraph transitions were not coherent.

Topics seemed patched together without a theme or argument.

Paper was hard or impossible to understand.

Frequent and relevant illustrations or other inclusions

Moderate use of graphical or other enhancements

Borders or style variations enhanced content

Text was clearly arranged for rapid comprehension

Content was displayed in a format that was hard to understand

Text was presented with regard for graphic or other enhancements

An introduction previews main points of study

An introduction is present but devoted to opinion or emotion only

An introduction is present but is unrelated to much of the content

Introduction is sketchy.

Introduction contains errors of fact or is based on unsupported claims.

Introduction is missing.

Body of paper develops and elaborates main ideas.

Development of theme or argument is incomplete.

Body of paper does not develop or build.

Body is not distinguishable from introduction and conclusion.

Disconnected paragraphs do not constitute a narrative body.

Body is missing.

A conclusion summarizes main points.

Conclusion does not address earlier discussions satisfactorily.

Conclusion is a repetition of earlier points.

Conclusion consists only of personal opinion.

Conclusion is too brief.

Conclusion is absent.

Paper free of mechanical errors (e.g., misspellings, typos, etc.)

A few errors were present.

The paper was marred by poor proofreading.

Errors were sufficient to impair comprehensibility.

Errors were present throughout the paper.

Writing mechanics were not appropriate for university-level work.

Paper grammatically sound (proper sentence structure)

Occasional errors were present.

Paper was marred by poor proofreading.

Errors were sufficient to impair comprehensibility.

Errors were present throughout the paper.

Grammar was not suitable for university-level work.

Citations and references in proper style (e.g., APA)

Occasional errors were present.

Citations and references were not consistent with each other.

Variations in citations and references would make it difficult to check sources.

Extent of the errors suggest that citations were copied from another source without prior reading of the work or no refereed articles among the references.

No evidence of an effort to comply with APA style or no citations or no references.

Option 1: Slide Presentation (e.g., PowerPoint). Set scores to zero if Option 2 selected.   

Topic, author, and date are clearly indicated.

Introduction lacks some important information.

Introduction is missing.

Visually pleasing, with appropriate use of headings, subheadings and white space

Appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or uses a distracting background.

Confusing or unreadable

Readable text with good placement and appropriate typeface

Lengthy, busy, or full of distracting and inappropriate embellishments

Missing, unreadable or inappropriate text

Graphics effectively supplement text.

Graphics present, but irrelevant or inappropriately used

No enhancements

Meets requirements of the assignment in length or size.

Comes acceptably close to meeting the requirements of the assignment.

Varies widely from the assigned requirements.

Option 2: Podcast. Set scores to zero if Option 1 selected.   

Describes the topic fully and accurately.

Describes the topic superficially or incorrectly.

Description fails to correspond to the written description.

Volume, transitions, and noise are effectively controlled.

Uneven control of sound that occasionally interferes with clarity

Missing intervals or unintelligible sound recording

Narrative enhanced with special effects throughout the delivery

Narrative exhibits momentary enhancement.

Narrative lacks creative enhancement.

Clear, well-rehearsed delivery

Unrehearsed or unclear delivery

Unintelligible enunciation

Meets requirements of the assignment in length or size.

Comes acceptably close to meeting the requirements of the assignment.

Varies widely from the assigned requirements.

Overall Score
       
  • 8 years ago
  • 20
Answer(1)

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
NOT RATED
  • attachment
    order_16538_psychology_paper_and_p.pptx