A plant biologist notices that plants grown in fertilizer are larger than plants grown without fertilizer. She then wonders...
A plant biologist notices that plants grown in fertilizer are larger than plants grown without fertilizer. She then wonders if fertilized plants also produce more fruits relative to non-fertilized plants. To test this, she carries out an experiment in a greenhouse with potted plants, some receiving fertilizer and some not. At the end of the experiment, she counts the fruits produced and finds that there is no difference between the fruits for the fertilized plants and the mass of fruits for the non-fertilized plants.
1. What is the observation?
2. What is the hypothesis?
3. What is the control?
4. Based on the results (no difference between the two groups), was the hypothesis proven true, supported or should it be rejected?
5. What if the fertilized group had more fruits than the non-fertilized group? Would the hypothesis have been proven true, supported or should it be rejected?
14 years ago
999999.99
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
![]()
Purchase the answer to view it

NOT RATED
Bids(0)
other Questions(10)
- Spread the word! it is Grand Opening Day at the Jeanery! every 5th customer will receive a coupon for a...
- The lopez family of 4 went camping 5 yrs in a row. Every year they brought 2 different guests. How...
- how many atoms are present in 155 mole of arsenic?
- which part of Earth consistently gets relatively intense and direct sunlight
- Math
- Write a Memo of Case study : SHU incorporated
- romeo and Julet paper
- Nia has 95 people invited to her family reunion. Each table can hold 12 people. How many tables will be...
- This is for two accounting questions
- Using the arc elasticity formula, and holding all else equal, estimate the impact on sales of a rise in disposable...