"Phyllis Young Only"

1) Do you think that voluntariness is morally important in euthanasia decisions? How important do you think that it is? For example, do you think that it is so important that whatever a person requests ought to be done? Explain. Does your conclusion regard the morality or also the legality of euthanasia?

2) Do you think that it is ever justifiable to treat people differently on the basis of their race or sex or religion or other group characteristic? Explain. Should we further multiculturalism and diversity? Why or why not?

3) Compare Nietzsche's concept of the "Will to Power" with Alfred Adler's insight that Nietzsche's "Will to Power" is not essential to human nature, but is, in fact, a neurotic pattern of behavior based on a "fictional goal" created by the individual in order to cope with the demands of society.

4) Do you think that non-human animals have interests? Does this mean that they also have rights? Explain.

5) Look up the term Environmental Ethics at http://plato.stanford.edu/, then answer the following questions: Do you think that a book, a plant, or a building can be said to have a good of its own? Can things be done in its best interest? Does it have interests? Explain your answers and whether you think that this is a good reason to think of that as having intrinsic value.

It's post has to be a minimum of 250 words with references cited in MLA format. Also each post most be related to one of the three ethical schools of thought (attachment included).