peer review

kieee

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Human Resource Management homework help

Objective
One of the duties of a leader-manager is to critically review work products from one’s colleagues. To hone your critical reviewing skills and assist you in the practice of thinking and writing as though you are a reviewer of your own work, you are asked to serve as an anonymous reviewer for one of your classmates. Support your work with APA style references.

Criteria
Assume that you are the lead chairperson of a committee designed by the CEO to review talent and performance of organizational managers. Your job is to read the final project (training module or theoretical essay) of another student and provide a constructive critical review of it, including specific suggestions for improvement and acknowledgement of excellence and exceptional performance.

Address the quality of conceptualization, research design (if appropriate), integration of appropriate literature, clarity of writing, completeness of training or theory generation, pragmatism of implementation, quality of assessment and PowerPoint presentations or the quality of research, and usefulness of feedback forms or recommendations and conclusions of the theoretical essay. Each review should make constructive suggestions to improve the work product and should support those observations with APA cited reference material. Your critical comments are based on course concepts learned throughout the quarter. If the peer-reviewed work is excellent and requires few critical comments for improvement, then make comments that support your perspective asserting the observation that the student’s work is excellent.

	Peer-Review
Points Possible 100

Criteria	Achievement Level
	Poor	Below Average	Average	Good	Excellence
Thesis Statement and Introduction Section	0 points No academically oriented research	13 points No thesis statement and/or a disjointed introduction	15 points No clear thesis statement and/or no organized introduction citing the concept	17 points Partially clear, concise, and focused thesis statement and introduction	20 points Clear, concise, and focused thesis statement with supporting introduction
Conflict Coaching Model	0 points Fails to address the topic or any aspects of the assignment	26 points Demonstrates virtually no knowledge of the Conflict Coaching Model	30 points Fails to recognize key concepts, principles and theories of the Conflict Coaching Model	34 points Demonstrates partial recognition of concepts, principles and theories of the Conflict Coaching Model	40 points Demonstrates full recognition of all concepts, principles and theories of the Conflict Coaching Model
Mastery of Material and Academic Research	0 points Underdeveloped; provides no or little scholarly value; fails to answer the thesis statement; mostly personal opinion	13 points Flawed mastery of the material and does not logically address the thesis statement; weak to no scholarly research material	15 points Partially demonstrates mastery of the material and uses some scholarly research	17 points Partially demonstrates mastery of the material and answers the thesis statement using scholarly research	20 points Demonstrates full mastery of the material and answers the thesis statement using scholarly research
Writing Mechanics	0 points Fails to demonstrate basic knowledge and use of writing mechanics, word usage, and sentence structure	13 points Total lack of attention to grammar and /or spelling; many APA mistakes; not written at the college level	15 points Several grammar, spelling and APA mistakes; not written at the masters level	17 points Uses simple but understandable sentence structure; few APA style, grammar, or spelling errors	20 points Grammatically well-constructed; No APA style, grammar or spelling errors