PAD 510 WEEK 9 DICUSSION 1 & 2

WEEK 9 DISCUSSION 1 & 2

must answer discussion in format listed below

DISCUSSION 1

"The Difficulties of Writing Policy"  Based on the lecture, address the following: 

·         Using a specific policy example, analyze the role ambiguity plays when there are conflicting policy goals.  Make sure to consider both positive and negative arguments. 

Here is a checklist for you to consider as you construct responses for Discussion Question 9.1:

>> Quality: Did you analyze role ambiguity for conflicting goals? (4 pts)

>> Relevance: Did you consider positive and negative arguments? (2 pts)

>> Word Count/Grammar: Is your post written in academic language and not slang or jargon? (1 pts)

>> Word Count/Grammar: Is your post longer than 250 words? (1 pts)

>> Participation: Did you provide substantive responses to at least one other post? (2 pts)

DISCUSSION 2

"Trade-Offs"  Please respond to the following  based on the e-Activity for this week:

·         Take a position on the following and provide support for your position from the debate over the USA PATRIOT Act described in the Chapter 8 case study. Do you agree that greater security must come with less freedom?

Here is a checklist for you to consider as you construct responses for Discussion Question 9.2:

>> Quality: Did you take a position on the policy? (4 pts)

>> Relevance: Did you describe your stance on security/freedom? (2 pts)

>> Word Count/Grammar: Is your post written in academic language and not slang or jargon? (1 pts)

>> Word Count/Grammar: Is your post longer than 250 words? (1 pts)

>> Participation: Did you provide substantive responses to at least one other post? (2 pts)