nyamaimule

profilejonbis

Ashford 4: - Week 3 - Discussion 1





Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. 

 

Relevant Costs

Two partners own together a small landscaping business in North Carolina, called Summer Lawn Care. They have been specializing in summer grass seeding, installation, and maintenance. Recently, the partners acquired special technology and know-how for winter grass installations and maintenance. They also added a tree cutting service as recent storms in the area had caused demand for this service to soar. One of the partners insists that the name of the business should change to Lawn and Tree Care, so that it better reflects the range of services and, thus, generates more customer interest, and thus contracts. The second partner wants to keep the old name and argues, “We have already paid for business cards, vehicle paint, signage, and ads in Yellow Pages”.  Evaluate the arguments of the two partners. Explain and illustrate their points by identifying the relevant and irrelevant costs for this decision.

Guided Response:
In 300 words or more, please, provide your response to the above discussion question. Identify all the costs in the decision process, including explicit costs, implicit costs and sunk costs. Respond substantively to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Substantive responses use theory, research, and experience or examples to support ideas and further the class knowledge on the discussion topic.

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.

Here are 2 students to respond to

Summer Lawn Care Name Change

Toby Kilbourn Email this Author

4/12/2016 4:21:27 PM

 

To effectively evaluate Summer Lawn Care's name change decision it is important to define the different costs involved which include explicit, implicit, and sunk costs. Douglas (2012) defines present-period explicit costs as outlays of cash used to pay for variable or fixed inputs that are required to implement a business decision. In contrast, implicit costs is a cost that represents a lost opportunity to leverage a company's resources, excluding cash, to generate revenue. Implicit costs are also defined as intangible costs as they are difficult to quantify (Investopedia.com, 2016). Additionally, Douglas (2012) defines a sunk cost as "Previously paid for purchases of assets including land, buildings, plant and equipment, and depreciation expenses based on these" (p. 179). Sunk costs are prepaid and therefore unrecoverable expenses. Finally, the three cost categories need to be segregated into relevant and irrelevant costs. According to Douglas (2012), relevant costs are a consequence of the decision while irrelevant costs are not associated with the business decision in any way. Table 1 shows the different cost and their respective categories for the proposed name change of Summer Lawn Care.  

Table 1 

 

The relevant explicit costs associated with changing the name of Summer Lawn Care include new vehicle paint, business cards, revised advertisements, and a new yellow page ad. The relevant implicit costs associated with not changing the business name include lost tree cutting revenue and unused tree cutting equipment. The sunk cost associated with the business are irrelevant to the decision and can be ignored for our purposes.  

Though there are multiple explicit cost associated with changing the company name almost all of those costs can be considered minor expenditures. There are two potential moderate to large outlays which are new vehicle paint and new advertisements (signs), both of which could easily cost a few thousand dollars depending on the quality and quantity required. In contrast to the low to moderate cost required to change the company name, losing work and revenue due to a customer base that does not know you offer a specific service could be very costly. Losing even one tree cutting job could cost thousands. Additionally, the scenario indicates that Summer Lawn Care has already purchased and used the required equipment for their tree cutting service. Thus this expenditure should be included in equipment as a sunk cost and could be underutilized if the company does not advertise. With the tree cutting equipment already purchased and the potential for lost revenue Summer Lawn Care should change their company name immediately. 

Reference 

Douglas, E. (2012). Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education   

Investopedia.com. (2016). Implicit Cost. Retrieved from  http://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/implicitcost.asp

Relevant Costs

Derek Aguilar Email this Author

4/12/2016 8:25:11 PM

 

            The problem with the name Summer Lawn Care is that it restricts the scope of what the consumer perceives the business to be.  Changing the name to Lawn and Tree Care would expand the scope of the business  and publicize the fact that they are not restricted to a single season.  The addition of the word ‘Tree” also indicates that they are a complete service and not restricted to only lawn care.  Changing the name, redesigning a logo and ordering new business cards or stationary is going to be very expensive in the short-term.  However, the long term benefits from the name change will generate more business and increase profits. 

            Relevant costs are those that are specific to management decisions and could be irrelevant in another situation or would differ depending on the given circumstances.  These costs are generally future costs, involve cash flow and are incremental.  To make effective decisions regarding relevant costs, irrelevant and sunk costs must be ignored.  Irrelevant costs are those that will not change based on management decisions or would be present regardless of which decision is made.  A sunk cost is one that has already been incurred and cannot be recovered.
            In the case of Summer Lawn Care, the money already invested in the business cards, signage and advertisements are sunk costs and should not be considered in the decision to change the name.  the only costs that should be considered would be the relevant costs of new business cards, signage and advertisements against the potential for future revenue. 

Douglas, E.J. (2012). Managerial Economics. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc.

Retrieved from the Ashford library.

Ashford 4: - Week 3 - Discussion 2





Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses.

 

Contribution Analysis

Explain what is meant by “contribution analysis”. Carefully define the term and provide examples to illustrate it.

Guided Response:
Can you think of a recent example where you had to evaluate the incremental costs and benefits of different options in order to make a decision? In 300 words or more, please, provide your response to the above discussion question. Respond substantively to at least two of your classmates’ postings. Substantive responses use theory, research, and experience or examples to support ideas and further the class knowledge on the discussion topic.

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.

 

 

 

 

    • 10 years ago
    • 10
    Answer(1)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      cost-analysis_comments.docx
    Bids(1)