The Misguided Advocates of Open Borders

profileFinance & Econ
 (Not rated)
 (Not rated)
Chat


let's say I chose from Wikibook a section on multiculturalism, then reading 2 will consist of another reading on multiculturalism which challenges the views expressed in the Wikibook's reading. And reading 3 will be a reading on multiculturalism chosen by you, an article, chapter, or essay from a newspaper, magazine; it can come from the web or a book or a journal.

you can write more, debating which argument is better. It may be that you disagree with reading 2, and decide to choose a reading 3 that makes more sense to you; then your journal should reflect your reasons why the arguments in reading 3 make more sense than the arguments in 2. Or, it may be the other way around, you actually agree with the reading I chose, 2, and although you chose a reading with a different view, 3, you may not agree with it, and so you explain why. However,  you may also choose a reading which agrees with 2, and your notes then are about these two readings say and why you agree with both. 

------------

what I need in this task is the following:

reading 2: The Misguided Advocates of Open Borders

http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2010/6/the-misguided-advocates-of-open-borders

reading 3: chosen by the writer as explained above.

    • 11 years ago
    The Misguided Advocates of Open Borders
    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    • attachment
      misguided.doc