liberalism,Neoconservatism,Paleoconservatism

Example:

let's say I chose from Wikibook a section on multiculturalism, then reading 2 will consist of another reading on multiculturalism which challenges the views expressed in the Wikibook's reading. And reading 3 will be a reading on multiculturalism chosen by you, an article, chapter, or essay from a newspaper, magazine; it can come from the web or a book or a journal.

you can write more, debating which argument is better. It may be that you disagree with reading 2, and decide to choose a reading 3 that makes more sense to you; then your journal should reflect your reasons why the arguments in reading 3 make more sense than the arguments in 2. Or, it may be the other way around, you actually agree with the reading I chose, 2, and although you chose a reading with a different view, 3, you may not agree with it, and so you explain why. However, you may also choose a reading which agrees with 2, and your notes then are about these two readings say and why you agree with both.

------------
please do each reading in one page
what I need in this task is the following:

reading 2:

a) Liberalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism
we are required to read only part of the first reading on liberalism, upto the section "Worldwide" (inclusive), not after the section "Europe"
like this would be a good example of NeoConservatism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nn_V8L3WbKk

b) Neoconservatism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism
we are required to read only a few sections from this reading: from the beginning up to the section "Michael Lind's view" (inclusive). Then read two more short sections: "Antisemitism" and "Trotskyism allegation".

c) Paleoconservatism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoconservatism
For this reading we are required to read only up to Kirkian legacy

reading 3: chosen by the writer as explained above.