The Law of Abandonment*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial*****Use as Guide Paper*****

profileSmart Study
 (Not rated)
 (Not rated)
Chat



Due Week 6 and worth 100 pointsOfficer Jones asked the neighborhood’s regular trash collector to put the content of the defendant’s garbage that was left on the curb in plastic bags and to turn over the bags to him at the end of the day. The trash collector did as the officer asked in order to not mix the garbage once he collected the defendant’s garbage. The officer searched through the garbage and found items indicative of narcotics use. The officer then recited the information that was obtained from the trash in an affidavit in support of a warrant to search the defendant’s home. The officer encountered the defendant at the house later that day upon execution of the warrant. The officer found quantities of cocaine and marijuana during the search and arrested the defendant on felony narcotics charges.

Write a two (2) page paper in which you:

  1. Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.
  2. Analyze the validity and constitutionality of officer’s Jones’ actions. 
  3. Discuss if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.
  4. Use at least two (2) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length. 

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Research and analyze procedures governing the process of arrest through trial. 
  • Critically debate the Constitutional safeguards of key Amendments with specific attention to the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments.
  • Describe the difference between searchers, warrantless searches, and stops. 
  • Write clearly and concisely about the criminal procedure using proper writing mechanics. 

 

Points: 100

Case Study 2: Plain View, Open Fields, Abandonment, and Border Searches as They Relate to Search and Seizures

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Identify the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.

Weight: 35%

Did not submit or incompletely identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.

Insufficiently identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.

Partially identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.

Satisfactorily identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.

Thoroughly identified the constitutional amendment that would govern Officer Jones’ actions.

2. Analyze the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.

Insufficiently analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.

Partially analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.

Satisfactorily analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.

Thoroughly analyzed the validity and constitutionality of Officer Jones’ actions.

3. Discuss if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.

Insufficiently discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.

Partially discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.

Satisfactorily discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.

Thoroughly discussed if Officer Jones’ actions were justified under the doctrines of plain view, abandonment, open fields, or border searches.

4. 2 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

    • 7 years ago
    The Law of Abandonment*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial*****Use as Guide Paper*****
    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    • attachment
      the_law_of_abandonment.docx