Problem 3. Suppose also that the mayor has many options at their disposal, e.g.,
build additional highways (very costly, necessitating large tax revenues), or build
specialized bicycle paths (more or less costly versions, e.g., even elevated from the
ground), they can spend more money on treating respiratory illnesses and illnesses
related to inactivity, they can subsidize shared driving, or they can impose some costs.
Perhaps some short-term costs may be recuperated in the long run? Additionally, you
can think that if a lazy person starts riding the bicycle more often, they start enjoying
it more, or that an active person driving their car more often might become lazier.
Or there may be vested interests related to promoting one mode of transportation
over another. Of course, there may be also the problem that riding a bicycle very far
might take more time than driving (provided there isn't much trac). You can of
course also consider many other possibilities (e.g., eect of reduced car sales on the
economy...). Come up with an interesting story, thinking as an economist (no right
answer, just a good argument), support it with specic cases and facts, if you can.
10 years ago
Purchase the answer to view it

- economics..doc