good work

profilemahmoud20

Argument Analysis

Writing viable arguments is often based on how well we understand the arguments made by others, in this case our classmates. Summarizing arguments leads to better understanding for readers and also helps authors see how someone unfamiliar with the topic receives her/his argument. If the summary of our partner does not match what we hope they take away from our paper, then we can see specifically what parts of our argument are weak and what we need to improve as we work toward our final papers.

 For this assignment you will need to go to the Toulmin Outline Analysis discussion forum, find your review partner, download or read her/his Toulmin essay, and then write a one-page, single-spaced summary of the main argument. Your essay should have a clear introduction, a body (in which you detail the author’s argument) and a conclusion that summarizes the author’s main points. Please be specific in your analysis and write it in a formal, scholarly tone.

 For examples, please look at the UMN Writing Center at:

 http://www.tc.umn.edu/~jewel001/CollegeWriting/WRITEREAD/Summary/samples.htm (Links to an external site.)

 Requirements

One-page, single-spaced analysis of your partner’s Toulmin Argument

12-Point Times New Roman Font

Professional Tone

 

 

Summary/Opposition Rubric (1) (1)
Summary/Opposition Rubric (1) (1)
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction, thesis and conclusion
Intro establishes context, the overall point is clear. Clear conclusion
10.0 pts
Insufficient context, or the point is slightly unclear or unfocused
7.0 pts
Little connection between ideas distracts from the author’s main point
5.0 pts
No identifiable point to the essay. The essay is one long summary of the work.
3.0 pts
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
evidence, claims, and conclusions are effectively analyzed and evaluated
10.0 pts
demonstrates some synthesis and critical thought, but fails to connect all ideas
7.0 pts
critical thinking and analysis are almost completely absent
5.0 pts
evidence, claims, and conclusions are ineffectively analyzed and evaluated
3.0 pts
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis, language, and logical fallacies
The summary is clear and well supported by specific examples from the text.
10.0 pts
The summary is good, but could be clearer or better supported
7.0 pts
The summary is unclear and there are very few, if any, specific examples connecting the ideas
5.0 pts
The summary is missing or unidentifiable
3.0 pts
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
The essay is well organized and the flow of ideas is logical and effective.
10.0 pts
The essay is mostly well organized and logical but some paragraphs are vague slightly disjointed
7.0 pts
Ideas are not logically ordered and the paragraphs are difficult to connect
5.0 pts
Ideas are disjointed and disconnected. The paragraphs are not connected in any logical way
3.0 pts
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLanguage, mechanics, and audience awareness
The essay is engaging and has an identifiable voice. The author uses transitions and professional language. No grammar errors
10.0 pts
The analysis is mostly engaging, but a few grammar errors or lack of professional tone distract from the flow. Some transitions are used
7.0 pts
The summary is difficult to follow and repeated grammar errors distract from the point. Very few transitions are used
5.0 pts
The tone is unprofessional, opinionated and overly emotional. There are too many grammar errors to follow the essay and no transitions.
3.0 pts
10.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0
 
  • 9 years ago
  • 10
Answer(1)

Purchase the answer to view it

blurred-text
  • attachment
    order_2.edited.docx
other Questions(10)