Functions

Functions

In this homework, you will design a program to perform the following task:

Design and write a program, using functions, that calculates the area and perimeter of a rectangle whose dimensions (length and width) are provided by a user.

There are 4 components of your submission including:

Program Description- A detailed, clear description of the program you are building.
Analysis- Demonstrates your thought process and steps used to analyze the problem. Be sure to include the required input and output and how you will obtain the required output from the given input? Also, include your variable names and definitions. Be sure to describe the necessary formulas and sample calculations that might be needed. Talk about how your design will allow any number of students and final grades to be possible inputs.
Test plan - Prepare at least 3 sets of input data (Test data) along with their expected output for testing your program. Your test data can be presented in the form of a table as follows (note: feel free to adapt to your design)
Pseudocode- Provide pseudocode of your overall design that fulfills the requirements of the project

All of these components should be placed in word document for submission.

Example application test data:

Test Case #	Input	Expected Output
1	Length =4.0, Width=8.0	Area = 32 Perimeter = 24
2	Your input data	Your expected output
3	Your input data	Your expected output

Submission requirements:

Your completed assignment should be saved as Word document and submitted to your LEO assignment area no later than the due date listed in the syllabus. Your document should be neat, well-written with minimal grammatical and spelling errors. Your name should be clearly listed on the first page along with the class/section, professor and due date. Your document should contain page numbers at the bottom of each page. Single or double space line formatting is acceptable.

Rubric Name: HWRevised

Criteria

	(36-40 points) Identify required inputs and output; describe in sufficient detail the process used to get the output using the inputs. Provide all variable names and definitions (names should be descriptive enough and appropriate for information they hold). Provide necessary formulas along with sample calculations. Analysis leading to a design that reliably and efficiently produces desired output, and meets project specifications. Obvious extra analysis was included resulting in new functionality and features to dramatically improve the application.	(28-35 points) Identify required inputs and output; describe in sufficient detail the process used to get the output using the inputs. Provide all variable names and definitions (names should be descriptive enough and appropriate for information they hold). Provide necessary formulas along with sample calculations. Analysis leading to a design that reliably and efficiently produces desired output, and meets project specifications.	(0-27 points) Most inputs and output were missing detailed descriptions or incorrect. Most variable names were missing definitions and appropriate descriptions. Most necessary formulas along with sample calculations were missing or incorrect. Analysis seemed short and missing major major project specifications details.
	(18-20 points) Use of modular design. Supply full detailed, appropriate pseudocode of overall design, including Main module and other modules used as appropriate. Use appropriate header and step comments in pseudocode. Obvious extra effort was used to develop additional well-designed pseudocode and flow charts to enhance the overall functionality of the application.	(14-17 points) Use of modular design. Supply full detailed, efficient and appropriate pseudocode of overall design, including Main module and other modules used as appropriate. Supply Flow charts as appropriate representing correct and efficient design. Use appropriate header and step comments in pseudocode.	(0-13 points) Minimal or no use of modular design. Pseudocode missing or minimally represents the application Flow charts missing or minimally represents the application Header and step comments in pseudocode missing or minimally provided.
	(18-20 points) At least 3 sets of test cases along with expected output and Pass/Fail inddicator for program testing. Additional test cases were provided to identify input data sets that would cause errors or crash the application.	(14-17 points) At least 3 sets of test cases along with expected output and Pass/Fail inddicator for program testing	(0-13 points) Minimal or no apparent test cases were provided.
	(18-20 points) Lessons learned were included documenting issues faced during this assignment and how these were overcome. Possible improvements were provided documenting weaknesses in the application and how to resolve those weaknesses or add additional useful functionality. A detailed accounting of the approach used to solve this problem was provided.	(14-17 points) Detailed lessons learned were included documenting issues faced during this assignment and how these were overcome. Detailed possible improvements were provided documenting weaknesses in the application and how to resolve those weaknesses or add additional useful functionality.	(0-13 points) No or minimal lessons learned provided No or minimal possible improvements provided
Overall Score

11 years ago

Report issue

Functions

NOT RATED

Purchase the answer to view it

perimeter_and_area_pseudo_code.docx

Functions

Rubric Name: HWRevised

Pseudo code class