FIN 571 Week 4 DQs

 

1.   Some firms use a single discount rate to compute the NPV of all its potential capital budgeting projects (Kruger, Landier,& Thesmar, 2011).  Even though, the projects have a wide range of non-diversifiable risk. The firm then undertakes all those projects that appear to have positive NPVs. Does this strategy really make sense?  Why or why not?

 

Reference:

Kruger, P., Landier, A., & Thesmar, D. (2011, September). The WACC Fallacy: The Real Effects of Using a Unique Discount Rate.

 

 

 

2.. If the IRR of a project is exactly equal to its cost of capital should you approve the project?  What are some things to consider?  Why?

 

 

3     Why are capital budgeting projects are frequently classified into groups such as maintenance, cost savings/revenue-enhancement, capacity-expansion, new product/new business, and projects mandated by regulation or firm policy?

 

 

4     Is it really necessary to perform post audits, reviewing and measuring the performance of previous capital investments?  Why?  How soon should this be done?

5     Why is it important to recognize and exclude sunk costs from a capital budgeting analysis?  After all, isn’t a cost a cost?

 

 

    • 12 years ago
    FIN 571 Week 4 DQs-Solution
    NOT RATED

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    • attachment
      fin_571_week_4_dqs-solution.zip