fin 534 week 6 discussion

* From the e-Activity, analyze the reasons why the short-term project that you have chosen might be ranked higher under the NPV criterion if the cost of capital is high, while the long-term project might be deemed better if the cost of capital is low. Determine whether or not changes in the cost of capital could ever cause a change in the internal rate of return (IRR) ranking of two (2).

* From the scenario, take a position for or against TFC’s decision to expand to the West Coast. Provide a rationale for your response in which you cite at least two (2) capital budgeting techniques (e.g., NPV, IRR, Payback Period, etc.) that you used to arrive at your decision.
I think the NPV and IRR methods can be used to make sense of whether TFC's decision to develop is a respectable choice. The WACC is 10.92%. On the off chance that it's not all that much inconvenience see the going with table for the normal cash streams: