families and social action forum responses
First responce:
New! Week 1 Forum Peters
Hey All!
My name is Cassie. I currently live in Portland, OR and work as a preschool teacher! I like to go on adventures, read, and play soccer and guitar! Just a small bit of an introduction!
In terms of family policy, I think the most important information from the transcript is the definition of family policy and what family policy entails. As the transcript states, family policy is somewhat of an extension/emphasis on social policy, but instead of the way we interact socially, family policy is the way we interact and work as a family (Bogenschneider & Gross, 2000). The transcript states the four family functions include family creation, economic support, childrearing, and family caregiving. Each of these functions is key to maintaining balance in the family, or maintaining family policy. If the family is not involved in the caregiving, who is caring for the children? Additionally with childrearing, who is teaching these children how to function in the home, as well as in their ecosystem, macro, micro, and mesosystems? Economic support is another key factor in maintaining a positive balance in the family because families in poverty often face larger issues than families who have economic support. According to Welch (2012), census data shows that there are upwards of 15.8 million children in America living in poverty. Children and families in poverty often face problems with mental and physical illness, as well as a decrease in their quality of life.
Another key point from the transcript is that each family creates their own family policy based on their perspectives of their family and family life. Every family has their own way of maintaining family balance based on the way they were raised and the way they want to raise children. Based on which way a family performs their childrearing and caregiving, their family policy may be different from their neighbors or from the other kid in their child's class, in the same aspect multiple families could have the same family policies and perspectives and raise their families the same.
The third piece of information that grabbed my attention was the Oregon Social Learning Center's parent education program, mainly because I am a resident of Oregon, but also because I am in the childcare field and have worked with many parents who I believe need education on parenting. According to Bogenschneider & Gross (2000), 30-40% of children who experienced inconsistent parenting in their early childhood years experience anti-social behaviors and become violent offenders later in life. The OSLC provides trainings for parents to learn about managing children with anti-social behavior, and preventing this behavior.
Cassie
Bogenschneider, K. (2000, November). Research update for practitioners: Putting family policy on the political agenda. Invited address for the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN.
Welch, K. J. (2012). Family life now: 2010 census update (2nd ed.). S.l.: Prentice Hall.
Second responce:
I found this to be a very interesting read and I feel I was able to learn a lot from this presentation. I’ve never researched the topic of family policy so I wasn’t exactly sure what to expect. Initially, my first thoughts on family policy were very similar to the example that Karen Bogenschneider gave but I quickly learned that it is so much more than that. I learned that family policy involves how politics regulate and place stipulations on what policies and programs are made to protect, serve and benefit families. “Family policies seek to strengthen families through research, education, and civic involvement” (Welch, 2011, p. 412). Programs that benefit families are extremely important especially for those that are within the low-income socioeconomic status. Families that live in poverty have a need for programs such as Medicaid, after school programs, childcare, etc. because their income does not allow for them to afford these programs without assistance. Something else I learned is that policymakers generally focus on the individual and not that of the family because they have a skewed view of the necessities of a family. Families are considered to be one and more research should be conducted on how individualistic views of these programs effect the family as a whole. Another thing that I learned was that the “United States is one of the only countries in the world that does not mention families in its constitution” (Bogenschneider & Gross, 2000, slide 11). I understand the concept behind not mentioning families in the constitution however I feel that since families are not mentioned it allows politicians to decide what programs benefit a family in any manner they see fit. A great example of this is Karen Bogenschneider mentioning the CHIP insurance program and how it protects some family members and not others. The CHIP program is specifically designated for children and sometimes their parents are eligible for programs such as Medicaid while other parents may have to purchase insurance through an insurance carrier. As someone that works with insurance, I have seen firsthand how families are financially burden when their child has a contagious disease and they as the parent aren’t covered by any insurance but they have to be treated. Not always is this medical coverage full coverage and there are cases where families have paid for a specific coverage, only to find out there that it only covers accidents or emergency room visits only. From the presentation I have learned that family policy must be placed at the top of priority list. Bogenschneider, K., & Gross, E., (2000). Research update for practitioners: Putting family policy on the political agenda. Invited address for the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN. Welch, K. J. (2011). Family Life Now: Census Update, 2nd Edition [VitalSource Bookshelf version]. Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com/books/9781323234549 |
Thrid responce:
The United States Department of Labor shows that the number of women in the labor force has gradually increased over the past four decades. In 1970, approximately 38 percent of the workforce was women, and in 2012, it rose to 47 percent (DoL, 2016). My family background coincides with the trends.
According to The State of Our Unions, 2008, the number of marriages drastically decreased from 77 percent in 1970 to 39 percent in 2007 (Carlson, 2009). These numbers coincide directly with the increase of women in the workforce. I do not think that it is coincidental that more and more women are working compared to three decades ago. Women didn’t have to work back then. Now, they almost have to either be married to someone that is working, or work themselves in order to get by.
My maternal grandmother lived on a farm with my grandfather, who was a farmer. She kept the books for the farm, but never worked outside of the home. They had nine children, one of whom died during infancy, but the rest of the children helped out on the farm from a young age. My mother had three children, and worked full- time at a local store for the majority of my younger years. My family struggled with money, so when I was a little older, around age 11 or 12, she went back to college to get a degree, and soon after, she was working full time for a hospital as an MRI technician, which paid considerably more than her minimum wage store clerk job. Now in my generation, I got my first part time job when I was 15, at a grocery store, then at a daycare center, McDonald’s, Arby’s, Blockbuster, then I joined the Navy. I always wanted to have my own money so I was eager to work. So over the generations, my grandmother did not work outside the home, but both my mother and I did. For my grandmother, the housework and childcare still was solely up to her. Until this day, she has dinner on the table by 5 P.M. for my 90 year old grandfather, and does all of the household chores. My mom and dad share duties, especially now that there are no kids living at home. But even when there were children at home, they typically shared all household duties.
My family is a little untraditional. I am active duty military, and my husband is a stay at home dad. We still share most of the household responsibilities, but he does all of the childcare during the week when I’m at work.
Raising a family is complicated in today’s society. There are so many more environmental concerns nowadays. We don’t want them to walk to the park or to the bus stop on their own, we have to monitor what they’re watching on TV, and on the computer, and what they listen to on the radio.
References:
Carlson, A. C., (2009). The Family in America: Retrospective and Prospective. The Family in America: A Journal of Public Policy. Retrieved from http://familyinamerica.org/journals/fall-2009/family-america-retrospective-and-prospective/#.V2HbkjZf1kK
The United States Department of Labor,. (2016). Civilian labor force by sex, 1970-2012. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/wb/images/chart_10mv.gif
fourth responce:
New! Women in the Work Force - Chelsey A
Hello everyone,
This week is about women in the work force. Women and their right to work has grown so much in the past years and decades. "Today, women make up nearly half of our workforce, and many women are the primary breadwinners for their families. In fact, more than 75 percent of single mothers are the sole provider for their family. The increased number of women in the labor force has both reflected and contributed to a major social transformation over the past several decades. Women’s notable progress over the years is reflected in their increased educational attainment, higher earnings, greater occupational diversity, and a larger presence in leadership positions and entrepreneurial fields." (USDL). I am glad to see numbers up for this due to the fact that more families in the modern day are broken up families and have single parents. Some questions that need to be answered are such:
How has your family changed over the past 3 generations in regard to women’s involvement in the workforce?
My family honestly hasn't changed that much due to the work force changing. My great grandmother always worked hard and passed that on to my grandma. My mom was a single mom so she worked while I was watched by my grandma or at a daycare.
What female family members worked or are working outside the home?
My great grandma, my grandma, and my mom all worked inside and out. My grandma worked in a home business while my mom worked outside the home. Each taught me that you work hard to get where you want to be.
How is that different from the workforce involvement of current female family members?
It is not different.
As a result, how has childcare and housework changed in your family?
In my case nothing changed because it is what I grew up with and was accustomed too. I never saw a woman in my family not work hard to better herself or her family.
With numbers such as so rising programs are being made to help families and single moms, married women and so on with things in their life. There are non-profit organizations today as well. Everything that is done will help children and their future. Duke actually made a program for things like this. "The Center for Child and Family Policy officially opened on July 1, 1999, guided by Bill Chafe’s broad and bold charge: “Make a difference!” Today the Center does just that, with more than $7 million in yearly grant funding, 70 employees and more than 40 affiliated faculty fellows. Faculty and staff work together to discover and evaluate strategies for improving children’s lives, and to share their discoveries with policymakers and public agencies." ( duke).
Everyone have a wonderful week,
Chelsey A
History, Retrieved from: http://childandfamilypolicy.duke.edu/about/history/
Overview, Retrieved from: https://www.dol.gov/wb/overview_14.htm
fifth responce:
|
sixth responce:
New! Week 3
Web Credibility Table
| Website #1 http://www.urban.org/ | Website #2 http://www.policyalmanac.org/ | Website #3 http://www.clasp.org/ | Website#4 (disputable) |
Publication process | Website has many published articles that include dates, authors, and resources listed. | Website has many links to other websites, but no sources listed on site. | Website has many published articles that include dates, authors, and resources listed. | Articles published do not list references, but do have dates and authors. |
Authorship and affiliations | Website has many experts in different fields listed with bios. Has a board of trustees, and executive committee. | None listed. | Website has a board of directors listed, as well as an array of experts listed. | Authors affiliations are not reputable. |
Sources and quotations | Sources clearly marked. | Sources not clearly marked. | Sources are clearly marked and identified. | Sources not listed. |
Bias and special interests | Special interest website, caters towards urban development in the U.S.. Does not seem to be biased. | Uncertain as to if bias or special interests exist. Website is hard to navigate. | The website itself is a special interest site that caters towards low income people, but they do not seem biased. | This website is most certainly biased. It was founded by the pastor of the First United Methodist Church in Southaven, Mississippi. It used to be called the National Federation for Decency, but has since changed its name to American Family Association. They claim to be a religious group that wants to hold companies accountable when they attack family values. |
Author qualifications | Author qualifications clearly listed on published articles. | Authors are not listed. | Authors qualifications are listed on published articles. | Not listed. |
Publication information | Dates, authors, and resources are clearly listed on all published articles and presentations. | Dates of posting are listed, but authors and resources are not listed. Links to some resources are given. | Dates, authors, and resources are clearly listed on all published articles and presentations. | Dates and authors are listed, but sources are not. |
seventh responce:
Last Edited By Artianna Singleton on Jul 7, 2016 12:36 AM “Our youth are not failing the system; the system is failing our youth. Ironically, the very youth who are being treated the worst are the young people who are going to lead us out of this nightmare.” — Rachel Jackson The above quote by Rachel Jackson highlights a very pertinent issue on the treatment of juveniles. The way the justice system is treating our youth is not effective in decreasing delinquency or criminal behavior. In today's day and age, the smallest crimes committed by juveniles can result in wrongful incarceration or wrongful deaths. According to the Gottesman and Schwarz (2011), over two million juveniles were arrested in 2008 and 95% of the ones arrested were non-violent crimes. More effective programs and reform policies need to be implemented across the nation to prevent juvenile delinquency and give juveniles a more directive path of guidance. Juveniles are young and their mistakes are inevitable. This statement is not just an opinion, but also a scientific proven fact. According to Reyna and Farley (2006), "brain maturation in adolescence is incomplete." Adolescents have the capability to know right from wrong, however, they tend to act before they think and are strongly influenced by peers. The root of bad decisions made by juveniles is not due to bad character, but rather immaturity. Therefore, reforms are needed to remind adolescents that their current actions do not have to be their future. Many reforms find the simplest, most affordable solution rather than focusing on the solution that results in the efficacy of adolescence. In a journal article about Oklahoma’s juvenile system, Jeremy Mason explores the injustice of the juvenile system and how the courts fail to evaluate the differences between juveniles and adults. Mason (2015) states that Oklahoma has been labeled as “one of the world’s worst juvenile justice systems in the country.” He provides a solution saying, “the first step toward solving the problems with the juvenile justice system is to realize the impracticality of maintaining a costly system that fails to provide the very benefits it claims to generate” (Mason 2015). Something interesting I came across in my research is that juveniles are 4.6 times greater to commit suicide than the general population (Stokes et al. 2015). It has been discovered the main reason for this statistic is associated with the mental health of juveniles. A fact sheet from The National Center of Child Poverty (NCCP), states that 27% of incarcerated youth suffer from severe mental illnesses (2011). Despite many juvenile facilities having therapist, the NCCP also reports that many facilities do not screen for mental illnesses. I find this to be an injustice to the youth in these facilities. Juvenile reforms need to be aware of the illness juveniles face in order to achieve positive results and decrease the amount of suicides. In order to decrease crimes committed by juveniles, I believe courts should look at each adolescent individually for what they are; adolescents crying out for help. I am not saying that there should be no consequence for juveniles’ actions, however, juveniles should be guided down the right path rather than be told they are nothing but criminals. The way juveniles are treated by the justice system will contribute to whether they will commit a crime again or become model citizens of society. References: Mason, J. A. (2015). Oklahoma’s juvenile justice system: Where we are today, the problems we face, and where changes should start. Oklahoma City University Law Review, 40(3), 631-667. Gottesman, D, Schwarz, S.W. (2011). Juvenile justice in the U.S. facts for policymakers. National Center for Child Poverty. [fact sheet]. Retrieved from http://www.nccp.org/publications/pdf/text_1038.pdf Stokes, M. L., McCoy, K. P., Abram, K. M., Byck, G. R., & Teplin, L. A. (2015). Suicidal ideation and behavior in youth in the juvenile justice system: A review of the literature. Journal Of Correctional Health Care, 21(3), 222-242. doi:10.1177/1078345815587001
|
eighth responce:
Can you believe it, there are only three countries in the entire world that do not promise paid maternity, and yes, you guessed it, the United States is one of them. The Family and Medical Leave Act was introduced in 1993 but only applies to companies with more than fifty workers and only includes twelve weeks of UNPAID time off (Pros and cons of paid paternal leave, 2015). Companies are allowed to off more time off or even paid time off but are responsible for the cost. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics there are only twelve percent of workers in American that can get paid paternal leave (Pros and cons of paid paternal leave, 2015). As a part of the White House Summit on Working Families, the Obama Administration is working on a 2.2 billion dollar effort to start paid paternal leave policies (Pros and cons of paid paternal leave, 2015). Unfortunately, it has gone nowhere so far at the federal level and probably will not anytime soon. The executive branch has granted federal employees six weeks of paid paternal leave, which was one advantage I really appreciated while I was in the military, if I had to go on six weeks of unpaid leave in the civilian world I am not sure how my family would survive with me being the primary breadwinner. There are also for states that offer paid parental leave being California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island (Pros and cons of paid paternal leave, 2015). Like many others you may ask yourself, is there actually any impact as far as health when it comes to children and mothers, and the answer is yes! According to a study done in 2011, paid paternal leave can actually reduce infant mortality rate by up to ten percent (Wallace & Christensen, 2015). The likelihood of infants getting well-baby care visits and vaccinations is also increased when parents are offered paid paternity leave. There are also long term effects of paid paternity leave. According to one story, women who took more than 12 weeks of maternity had fewer symptoms of depression, a decrease in severe depression, and their overall mental health improved (Wallace & Christensen, 2015). Another study found that women who had the opportunity to have a more generous maternity leave were eighteen percent less likely to suffer from depression 30 years later when they are fifty or older (Wallace & Christensen, 2015). There was also a study that showed men who took 10 days or longer of paternity leave were more involved with their children as well as child care activities compared to mean who did not take any leave at all (Wallace & Christensen, 2015).
References: Wallace, K. & Christensen, J. (2015). The benefits of paid leave for children are real, majority of research says. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/29/health/paid-leave-benefits-to-children-research/ Pros and cons of paid paternal leave. (2015). NBC. Retrieved from http://www.nbc-2.com/story/30479554/pros-and-cons-of-paid-parental-leave#.V32fyVU4nTY
|
|
| |
First response to classmate posted by Sunday | 10 |
|
First response is at least 200 words | 10 |
|
First response employs at least 2 citations; one can be text; other must be from an academic source | 10 |
|
|
|
|
10 years ago
20
Purchase the answer to view it

- order_314_families_and_social_action_forum_responses_1.doc

Reply