Essay
Im taking ENGL101 class. its my eportfolio essay about my development in this class.
(I want you to do my essay like you are taking this class)
e-Portfolio Reflective Essay
Assessing Your Development as a Writer
Assess – (from my American Heritage Dictionary) “make a judgment about”
Write an essay in which you make a judgment about your development as a writer this semester in English 101. You will use the following criteria:
1. General habits (planning out your assignment, drafting, revising, allowing enough time)
2. College Composition Goals: Three ENGL 101 course objectives from the Overall Course Objectives (see B.OVERALL COURSE OBJECTIVES)
3. Writing Skills: Three “major topics” from the syllabus (see page 2)
A more detailed description of the evaluation criteria is included on the description to the “e-Portfolio Assessment Project,” distributed in class on Friday, May 1.
You will use the evidence you have been putting into your e-portfolio to support the criteria. In addition, you will use hand-written comments from papers and scoring rubrics that I have returned.
Please follow the SCORING RUBRIC(below) while you are writing the essay.
Paragraph 1: 5 points
begin with a brief introductory statement about this semester in English 101. You will conclude the introduction with a thesis statement that best assesses (makes a judgment about) your development as a writer.
Paragraphs 2 - 4: 5 points each
these paragraphs will be descriptions of your habits, College composition goals, and writing skills.
Paragraph 5: 20 points
This paragraph will be a reflective paragraph, evaluating your development as a writer. You will draw from the specific details you identified in paragraphs 1 – 3 to illustrate your evaluation.
This reflective paragraph may include a mixed judgment: you may have improved in some areas, but did not change in others; you may identify frustration in some areas of writing as well as a sense of achievement in others. Your judgment will connect with at least three specific details from paragraphs 2 – 4, and shows some insight or reasoning about why you improved did not improve.
Your essay should be about 400 – 600 words. 10 points
You may use first person pronoun, but eschew second person pronouns. Your writing should be clear, concise, and error free.
This should be an honest and objective assessment of your writing, not a persuasive essay to get a high grade.
Please follow the SCORING RUBRIC(below) while you are writing the essay.
B. Overall Course Objectives:
Upon completion of this course, students will be able to do the following:
1. employ a recursive writing process that includes invention, planning, drafting, revising, proofreading and editing;
2. work collaboratively with peers to plan, develop, and carry out writing projects and provide constructive feedback;
3. write well-organized, unified, coherent essays with clear and complete thesis statements that express a purpose;
4. think critically and support the thesis with details, examples, reasons, and other evidence;
5. employ a variety of rhetorical strategies and modes to express complex ideas;
6. vary sentence structure and length;
7. use language in a manner appropriate to a given audience;
8. conduct research; access and choose appropriate sources from standard library resources which may be in a variety of formats both print and electronic;
9. evaluate sources (which may be print or electronic) by examining authenticity, currency, validity, and reliability;
10. incorporate outside material into essays by summarizing, quoting, and paraphrasing correctly;
11. provide documentation for sources with a Works Cited page and parenthetical citations, using the MLA format;and
12. conform to the grammar, punctuation, and spelling rules of standard written English with a minimum of errors.
C. Major Topics
1. Audience awareness
2. Writing as a recursive process
3. Essay organization and development
4. Unity, coherence and clarity in written language
5. Rhetorical strategies
6. Sentence variety
7. Grammar, punctuation and usage review
8. Summarizing, paraphrasing and quoting
9. Documenting and citing both print and electronic sources in MLA format
10. Writing the research paper that employs a variety of print and electronic sources
11. Revising
12. Editing and proofreading
13. The impact of technology on writing
e-Portfolio Assessment Project
Scoring Rubric for Reflective Essay
Topic | Does not meet C criteria | Meets C criteria | Exceeds C criteria |
| 0 – 2 points | 3 points | 4 – 5 points |
Introduction 0 – 5 pts | One or two sentences mentioning ENGL 101; inflated/self gratuitous statement about development; only one sentence assessing your development as a writer. | Introductory statement about this semester’s experience in ENGL 101, gives brief overview of criteria to discuss and clearly assesses your development as a writer. | Also includes thoughts, goals, or misgivings at the beginning of the semester and firmly connects your assessment with your goals or expectations. |
Para 2: description of general writing/study habits throughout the semester 0 – 5 points | General description about writing process; less than 3 specific details; little or no mention of change during the semester | Objective description of recursive process (e.g. preparation, revising, and editing); include changes in habits or state some habits did not change. Use at least three specific details. | Objective description of a variety of processes involved in writing and comment on whether you did or did not try new approaches or strategies |
Para 3: ENGL 101 course objectives from syllabus 0 – 5 points | Identifies fewer than three objectives from syllabus, general comments on change, no specific details from essays. | Identifies three objectives from course syllabus and comments on any change (ideally improvement) throughout the semester. Uses specific comments from graded papers or scoring rubric | Identifies and comments on nature of improvement, or if no improvement, comments on static results. |
| 0 – 2 points | 3 points | 4 – 5 points |
Para 4: ENGL 101 Major topics from syllabus 0 – 5 points | Identifies fewer than three major topics from syllabus, general comments on change, no specific details from essays. | Identifies three major topics from course syllabus and comments on any change (ideally improvement) throughout the semester. Uses specific comments from graded papers or scoring rubric | Identifies and comments on nature of improvement, or if no improvement, comments on static results. |
| 0 – 10 points | 11 – 15 points | 16 – 20 points |
Para 5 Reflective statement 20 points | Offers a general judgment; Judgment is not clearly supported with examples from paragraphs 2 – 4; Uses fewer than three specific details; Shows little insight or reasoning about your development Inflated assessment of development. | Makes a clear judgment of development as a writer through the course of the semester. The judgment may be mixed: improvement in some areas, no change in others, frustration in some areas, a sense of achievement in others. Connects judgment with at least three specific details from paragraphs 2 – 4, and shows some insight or reasoning about why you improved did not improve. | In addition, the areas of improvement/no improvement are clearly represented in the examples and clearly related to course goals and objectives. Comments also will include your insight connecting your study habits, personal expectations, and strengths and weaknesses with the more specific course objectives. |
| 0 – 4 points | 5 – 7 points | 8 – 10 points |
Composition, grammar, and mechanics | Essay is too short – significantly fewer than 400 words No topic sentences Overuse of second person pronoun Poor proofreading Distracting grammar errors | Essay is at least 400 words Every paragraph has a topic sentence Every paragraph is coherent and completely developed One or two second person pronouns slip in; one or two p/a agr errors 3 grammar & mechanics errors | Essay does not have to be 600 words, but all ideas are clearly and completely developed.
One or two grammar, spelling, and mechanics errors. |
11 years ago
3
Purchase the answer to view it

- aslain_final.docx