ENG 102: Portfolio Project Rubric
NG102: Portfolio Project Rubric
Criteria
Meets Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
1315 Points
Preliminary
Delivered topic selection
Deliverable
and working thesis
Topic Selection statement via email in
and Thesis
Week 3 as required.
Approaches Expectation
Below Expectation
79 Points
Delivered topic
selection or working
thesis statement via
email in Week 3, but
not both.
Preliminary
Deliverable
Outline and
Analysis of
Posts
1012 Points
Delivered topic selection
and working thesis
statement via email in
Week 3, but with
significant omission or
error.
2125 Points
1620 Points
Posted a working outline Posted a working outline
in Week 5 and read,
in Week 5. Read,
analyzed and
analyzed and
commented upon at least commented upon at least
two other students posts two other students
as required.
posts, but with significant
omission or error in one
or both.
1720 Points
1316 Points
The Portfolio includes all The Portfolio includes
of the required
most of the required
components, as specified components, as specified
in the assignment.
in the assignment.
1115 Points
Posted a working
outline in Week 5 as
required orread,
analyzed and
commented upon one
or two other students
posts, but did not
complete both.
912 Points
The Portfolio includes
some of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
1924 Points
1318 Points
Some significant but not Major errors or
major errors or omissions omissions in
in demonstration of
demonstration of
knowledge.
knowledge.
Requirements
Content
2530 Points
Demonstrates strong or
adequate knowledge of
the materials; correctly
represents knowledge
from the readings and
sources.
Limited Evidence
46 Points
Failed to deliver topic
selection and working
thesis statement via
email in Week 3 as
required.
610 Points
Failed to post a
working outline in
Week 5 and failed to
read, analyze and
comment upon other
students posts as
required.
58 Points
The Portfolio includes
few of the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
712 Points
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
5365 Points
Definition and Provides a
Analysis of the comprehensive definition
Social Problem and analysis of the social
problem; analysis is
backed by documented
evidence.
3340 Points
Criteria for the Criteria for the solution
Solution
are well chosen, clear
and concise.
6175 Points
4052 Points
Definition and analysis of
the social problem
demonstrates some
significant but not major
flaws or omissions.
2532 Points
Criteria for the solution
demonstrate some
significant but not major
flaws or omissions.
4660 Points
2739 Points
Definition and analysis
of social problem
demonstrates major
flaws or omissions, or
numerous minor
flaws.
1724 Points
Criteria for the
solution demonstrate
major flaws or
omissions or
numerous minor
flaws.
3145 Points
1426 Points
Provides little to no
definition and/or
analysis of the social
problem.
916 Points
Criteria for the
solution are missing or
unacceptable.
1630 Points
ENG102: Portfolio Project Rubric
Presentation
Presents a solution that
of the Solution best fits the need or
problem; uses research
that proves this solution
will correct or fix the
problem; provides a
thorough explanation of
the implementation of
this solution.
1720 Points
Selection and
Sources well or
Application of adequately chosen to
Source
provide substance and
Material
perspectives on the
issue; knowledge from
the course linked
properly to source
material.
Mechanics and Writing
1720 Points
Organization
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper essay
format including an
introduction, body, and
conclusion. Conforms to
project requirements.
Grammar and
Style
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
1720 Points
Strong sentence and
paragraph structure; few
or no minor errors in
grammar and spelling;
appropriate writing style;
clear and concise with no
unsupported comments.
1720 Points
Project contains proper
APA formatting, according
to the CSUGlobal Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with no
more than one significant
error.
Total points possible = 350
Presentation of the
solution and/or the
implementation of the
solution demonstrate
significant but not major
flaws.
Presentation of the
solution and/or the
implementation of the
solution demonstrate
major flaws or
omissions or
numerous minor
flaws.
Presentation of the
solution and/or the
implementation of the
solution is inadequate
or unacceptable.
1316 Points
Some significant but not
major problems with
selection and linkage of
sources.
912 Points
Major problems with
selection and linkage
of sources.
58 Points
Source selection is
seriously flawed; no
linkage to knowledge
from the course.
1316 Points
Small number of
significant but not major
flaws in organization and
writing; is in proper essay
format. In a minor way
does not conform to
project requirements.
912 Points
Major problems in
organization and
writing; does not
completely follow
proper essay format.
In a significant way
does not conform to
project requirements.
912 Points
Inconsistent to
inadequate sentence
and paragraph
development; work
needed on grammar
and spelling; does not
meet program
expectations.
912 Points
Significant errors in
APA formatting,
according to the CSU
Global Guide to Writing
and APA Requirements,
with four to five
significant errors.
58 Points
Project is not well
organized or well
written and is not in
proper essay format.
Does not conform to
project requirements.
1316 Points
Small number of
significant but not major
errors in grammar and
spelling; generally
appropriate writing.
1316 Points
Few errors in APA
formatting, according to
the CSUGlobal Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with no
more than two to three
significant errors.
58 Points
Poor quality;
unacceptable in terms
of grammar and/or
spelling; inappropriate
writing style that
interferes with clarity.
58 Points
Numerous errors in
APA formatting,
according to the CSU
Global Guide to Writing
and APA Requirements,
with more than five
significant errors.
11 years ago
Purchase the answer to view it

- zero_tolerance_policy.doc