discussion week 2

profilevivinana8591

The U.S. GAAP standards in this image (and found in your book on page 80) were developed and codified by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and accepted by the AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants). You have probably heard of the AMA (American Medical Association) for physicians. It is a professional organization that promotes and educates physicians. The professional organizations that developed GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) are similar to the AMA in that they provide a similar role for accountants providing guidance for how GAAP accounting standards must be applied. 

Case Study 5-1 on pages 80-81 demonstrates the way professional accountants must use professional judgement when reporting results. Medicine is art and science.  "Accounting is more art than science". (Harrison and Harrison, 2013, p.80)

 

Read the case and discuss the following:

Which of the approaches in the case most accurately reflects the financial operations of the company for their first year of operation?

 

What are the two different accounting treatments offered? Do you find both acceptable, and why or why not?

 

 

Participation Requirements: The minimum number of posts this week is 3 substantive posts (total) for the week on3 different days. Initial post is due by Wednesday. Please refer to the grading rubric for discussions in your gradebook. Remember that APA format is required.

 

 

 

Shauna Lewis

 

 

 

Name: Discussion Board Rubric - Points Rang

[removed]

 
 PoorSatisfactoryGood
Initial Post - Substantive post
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 9.9 (9.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Student did not submit an appropriate and substantive post to the original assignment of at least 100 words. Could include not addressing all of the original questions/issues in a grammatically correct and logical manner
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 10 (10%) - 19.9 (19.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Student submitted an appropriate post to the original assignment but it is either not substantive or is not at least 100 words. Could include not addressing all of the original questions/issues in a grammatically correct and logical manner.
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 20 (20%) - 30 (30%)
[removed] [removed]
Student submitted an appropriate and substantive post to the original assignment of at least 100 words. This includes addressing all of the original questions/issues in a grammatically correct and logical manner
Feedback:
 
Initial Post - Submitted on time
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4.9 (4.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment not submitted on time by Wednesday and not submitted on a different day than other posts
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 7.9 (7.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment either not submitted on time by Wednesday or not on a different day than other posts
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment submitted on time by Wednesday and on a different day than other posts
Feedback:
 
Initial Post - Appropriate source used
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4.9 (4.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Appropriate sources were not used
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 7.9 (7.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Outside sources used but not an appropriate article from the library
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)
[removed] [removed]
An appropriate accounting article from the library was used
Feedback:
 
Initial Post - APA Citation
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4.9 (4.9%)
[removed] [removed]
References are not cited in APA format and less than 50% of the post is original work of the student not taken from outside sources
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 7.9 (7.9%)
[removed] [removed]
References are partially cited in APA format and most of the post is original work of the student not taken from outside sources
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)
[removed] [removed]
References correctly cited in APA format and 80% of the post is original work of the student not taken from outside sources
Feedback:
 
Post 2 - Substantive post
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4.9 (4.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Student did not submit an appropriate response to another student
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 7.9 (7.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Student submitted an appropriate response to another student but it is either not a substantive response or is lacking in grammar and logic
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)
[removed] [removed]
Student submitted an appropriate and substantive response to another student’s post in a grammatically correct and logical manner
Feedback:
 
Post 2 - Submitted on time/different day
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1.9 (1.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment not submitted on time and not submitted on a different day than other posts
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2.9 (2.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment submitted on time but on the same day as other posts
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment submitted on time and on a different day than other posts (suggested no later than Friday)
Feedback:
 
Post 2 - Length
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1.9 (1.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment less than 2 complete sentences.
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2.9 (2.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment only 2-3 complete sentences.
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment met minimum of 3-4 complete sentences.
Feedback:
 
Post 3 - Substantive post
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4.9 (4.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Student did not submit an appropriate response to another student
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) - 7.9 (7.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Student submitted an appropriate response to another student but it is either not a substantive response or is lacking in grammar and logic
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 8 (8%) - 10 (10%)
[removed] [removed]
Student submitted an appropriate and substantive response to another student’s post in a grammatically correct and logical manner
Feedback:
 
Post 3 - Submitted on time/different day
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1.9 (1.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment not submitted on time and not submitted on a different day than other posts
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2.9 (2.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment submitted on time but on the same day as other posts
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment submitted on time and on a different day than other posts (suggested no later than Saturday)
Feedback:
 
Post 3 - Length
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) - 1.9 (1.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment less than 2 complete sentences.
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 2 (2%) - 2.9 (2.9%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment only 2-3 complete sentences.
Feedback:
 
Points:
Points Range: 3 (3%) - 5 (5%)
[removed] [removed]
Assignment met minimum of 3-4 complete sentences.
    • 10 years ago
    • 5
    Answer(1)

    Purchase the answer to view it

    blurred-text
    NOT RATED
    • attachment
      gaap.docx
    • attachment
      2_responses.docx
    Bids(1)