Developing Leisure Enterprises; Understanding Management and Finance
SuperClassSchool of Sport, Performing Arts and Leisure
Leisure Industries
Module Assessment Brief
Module code and title
| 4LI008 – Developing Leisure Enterprises; Understanding Management and Finance |
Module leader | Ghislaine Povey |
Assessment No and Type (i.e. essay, report, portfolio, presentation, performance etc) | Assessment number: 1 Portfolio
|
Assessment weighting
| Assessment 1: 100% |
Learning outcomes being assessed
| LO1 Understand different management theories and functions in the leisure context
|
Submission details (date, time and location) | 8th May, 2014, 4pm |
Assessment Description and Advice This is an individual piece of work comprising of a portfolio of 3 tasks.
Task 1: Identify and acquire a published set of company accounts. Analyse the accounts using ratios and other interpretive methods. Each student needs to use a set of accounts from the most recent tax year. Task 2; Reflect upon how you manage your own money, using the budgeting and cashflow chart skills you develop in your seminars you need to produce a cashflow for your money for 2014 as best you can. Identify a financial goal for yourself. This may be a holiday, a car, or a new wardrobe for example. You must identify how you can budget, aiming to save sufficient money to meet your goal, whilst living within your means. Task 3: Produce a reflective self-analysis of your own approach to management according to the principles learnt during the module. In doing so, discuss management theory and concepts as they relate to examples from your own work based experiences. In order to support students, there will be opportunities for students to practice and work on elements of the assessment in workshops. You will also have an individual assessment tutorial in week 10 in addition to assessment guidance surgery in week 11. Weight: 100% Word limit:2000 words maximum Date: 8th May at Here2Help before 4pm
| |
Assessment Grading Criteria
Please see below
| |
Level 4 Grading Descriptors
90-100% Outstanding | Focused and comprehensive engagement with the question, showing evidence of in-depth understanding of the issues. Extremely clearly structured and demonstrating a coherent argument throughout. Evidence of wide, independent reading.
No obvious errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
80-89% Excellent | Detailed identification of the issues with evidence of clear understanding of the issues. Well-structured with evidence of independent reading supporting the argument.
Very few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
70-79% Very good | Identification and very good understanding of issues in the assessment. Full answers to all questions/task. Very clear argument with relevant examples used to illustrate response. Clear evidence of reading outside the module list.
Few errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
60-69% Good | Good understanding of the issues. Engages directly with the question. Clear argument with good examples used to support it. All main points and important issues of the question/task covered. Some evidence of reading outside the module list
Some small repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate |
50-59% Competent | Generally sound understanding of basic theory and concepts. Content relevant to the question/task. Competently deals with main issues. Reading based on main texts or materials, but not always fully utilised in supporting argument.
Some repeated errors in referencing or grammar or syntax as appropriate. |
40-49% Pass | Some evidence of understanding of basic concepts/issues. Content broadly relevant but with limited or little application of theory. Almost totally descriptive. |
30-39% Fail | Some learning outcomes and / or assessment criteria not met.
Superficial treatment of issues. Some is relevant to topic set. Material merely repeats taught input. Lacks understanding of basic theory or concepts. Possible use of extensive quoted passages.
Evidence of sufficient grasp of learning outcomes to suggest that the participant will be able to retrieve the module on resubmission. |
20-29% Fail | No learning outcomes fully met. Little evidence of attempts to engage with module materials. |
10-19% Fail | Little attempt to engage with assignment brief and has not met learning outcomes. Inadequate demonstration of knowledge or understanding of key concepts, theories or practice. |
0-9% Fail | No real attempt to address the assignment brief or learning outcomes |
Student Number:
Department of Leisure Industries
Assessment Feedback Sheet Essay
Module code |
| Module title |
|
Tutor’s name |
| Tutor’s signature |
|
Strengths of this Piece of Work
| |
Areas for Development
| |
% Grade for the Assignment |
|
For Moderation Purposes
| |
10 years ago
Purchase the answer to view it
developing_leisure_enterprises_understanding_management_and_finance.docx
