| BUSA 5061 | Class or Cohort _________________________ |
| Dakota Office Products Case Analylsis | | | | |
| Grading Rubric | Student _________________________________ |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| TOPIC OR ISSUE | Possible Points | | Points Earned | Comments |
| | | | | |
| Cover Page | 5 | | | |
| 5: Complete, attractive title page | | | | |
| 3-4: Brief, less attractive | | | | |
| 1-2: Very brief, not attractive | | | | |
| 0: Missing cover page | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Format and Style | 5 | | | |
| 5: No errors, clear | | | | |
| 4: Few errors, uses subheadings | | | | |
| 3: No subheadings, unclear format | | | | |
| 1-2: Poor style or format | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Introduction | 10 | | | |
| 9-10: Clear, well-written, answers "what or why" | | | | |
| 7-8: Too long, too short, not clear | | | | |
| 5-6: Weak introduction | | | | |
| 0: Missing introduction | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Case Analysis | 30 | | | |
| 29-30: Complete, well-supported, organized | | | | |
| 27-28: Moderate discussion of issues and alternatives | | | | |
| 25-26: Inadequate discussion | | | | |
| 15-24: Highly inadequate discussion, no alternatives | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Summary | 10 | | | |
| 9-10: Clear, well-written, relates to intro | | | | |
| 5-8: Too long, too short, not clear | | | | |
| 0: Omitted summary | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Use of Activity-Based Costing | 10 | | | |
| 10: Superior application of ABC | | | | |
| 9: Good application of ABC | | | | |
| 7-8: Moderate use of ABC or other managerial accounting concepts | | | | |
| 5-6: Inadequate use of managerial accounting concepts | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Grammar and Computations | 15 | | | |
| 15: No errors | | | | |
| 14: 1-2 errors | | | | |
| 13: 3-4 errors | | | | |
| 12: 5-6 errors | | | | |
| 11: Overall inadequate writing skill or computational skill | | | | |
| 10-5: Very poor writing skill or computational skill | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Quality of Analysis or Thought | 15 | | | |
| 15: Superior analysis of managerial accounting issues and alternatives | | | |
| 14: Good analysis of managerial accounting issues and alternatives | | | | |
| 12-13: Moderate analysis of managerial accounting issues | | | | |
| 10-11: Inadequate analysis of managerial accounting issues | | | | |
| 5-9: Highly deficient analysis of managerial accounting issues | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | 100 | | | |
TOTAL POINTS | DAKOTA OFFICE PRODUCTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Write in the names of your | | | | Activity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | cost drivers (below) | | Total | | Base | | | | Cost | | | | | | | | | | | | hint: see computations | | Cost | | Units | | # Units | | Per Unit | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Driver #1 | | xxxx | | # cartons | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Driver #2 | | xxxx | | # cartons | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Driver #3 | | xxxx | | # deliveries | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Driver #4 | | xxxx | | # orders | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Driver #5 | | xxxx | | # lines | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Driver #6 | | xxxx | | # orders | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | a) computations | | Total | | Warehouse | | Desktop | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cost | | Processing | | Delivery | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Warehouse Personnel | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Processing cartons - 90% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Desktop Delivery - 10% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Warehouse Rent/Deprec | | xxxx | | xxxx | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Delivery Truck Expenses | | xxxx | | | | xxxx | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | | | #VALUE! | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | b) computations | | Manual | | Manual | | Process | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Order | | Order | | EDI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | Processing | | Entry | | Orders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Order Entry Expenses | | 20% | | 75% | | 5% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | xxxx | | #VALUE! | | #VALUE! | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DAKOTA OFFICE PRODUCTS | | | | | | | | | Customer Profitability | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Customer A | | Customer B | | | | | | | | | | | | Sales | | | | | | 103,000 | | | | 104,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | Cost of items purchased | | | | | | 85,000 | | | | 85,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | Gross Margin | | | | | | 18,000 | | | | 19,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of cartons ordered | | 52 | | 200 | | 10,400 | | 200 | | 10,400 | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of cartons shipped | | 6 | | 200 | | 1,200 | | 150 | | 900 | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of desktop deliveries | | 220 | | | | 0 | | 25 | | 5,500 | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of orders, manual | | 10 | | 6 | | 60 | | 100 | | 1,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of line items, manual | | 4 | | 60 | | 240 | | 180 | | 720 | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of EDI orders | | 5 | | 6 | | 30 | | | | 0 | | | | | | | | | | | | Average Accounts Receivable | | @10% int | | 9,000 | | 900 | | 30,000 | | 3,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | Toal service costs | | | | | | 12,830 | | | | 21,520 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Customer Contirbution (Loss) | | | | 5,170 | | | | (2,520) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DAKOTA OFFICE PRODUCTS | | | | | | Customer Profitability | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Customer A | | Customer B | | | | | | | | | Sales | | | | | | 103,000 | | | | 104,000 | | | | | | | | | Cost of items purchased | | | | | | 85,000 | | | | 85,000 | | | | | | | | | Gross Margin | | | | | | 18,000 | | | | 19,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Number of ……. | | ?? | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Number of ……. | | ?? | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Number of ……. | | ?? | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Number of ……. | | ?? | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Number of ……. | | ?? | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Number of ……. | | ?? | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Average Accounts Receivable | | @10% int | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | ?? | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | Toal service costs | | | | | | #VALUE! | | | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Customer Contirbution (Loss) | | | | #VALUE! | | | | #VALUE! | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | #VALUE! | | | | #VALUE!
|
|
|