CSIA 485 Project #5

ShiaRo

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Computer Science homework help

Using the recommendation memo and network diagram, develop a high-level plan for implementing the changes and mitigating vulnerabilities and convergence issues. The high-level plan should include all the system development life cycle (SDLC) gates/decision points and all relevant tasks. Describe and relate the implementation solution to CIA and incorporate, people, processes and technology to this plan.

This is a combination of a paper and a detailed list of steps and resources that you would follow to implement and complete this project. Think about all of the actions, resources, and tasks that you would need in order to effect a successful implementation. These should also be included as part of the plan. The instructor may provide a template to use with this assignment. The minimum structure for this assignment is below:

INTRODUCTION

Purpose of Plan

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Business Goals and Objectives
Project Goals and Objectives

SCOPE

Scope Definition
Items Beyond Scope

PROJECTED EXPENSES

System Development Life Cycle/Schedule
Milestones

ASSUMPTIONS

Project Assumptions

CONSTRAINTS

Project Constraints
Critical Project Barriers

The Plan will be a minimum 5 page, double-spaced paper using Times New Roman 12 font and APA style formatting for citations and references. It will also include a minimum of 5 references. The Title/Cover page, illustrations (tables/charts/graphs), network diagram, and references are not part of the page count but are required for the assignment. The grading rubric provides additional details as to what should be included in the paper. Your instructor may provide an APA style template to use for this paper.

*** Make sure that you include in detail the steps you would take to secure the project.

Project Expenses
	Expertly defines goals and objectives	identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort	identifies goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a basic understanding of overall effort	identifies goals and objectives in a manner where some aspects are missing or incomplete.	does not identify goals and objectives in a manner that reflects a general understanding of overall effort.
	Clearly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies material and document relationships.	Basically describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Synthesizes and applies some material and document relationships.	Weakly describes and relates information security and other technology issues. Some synthesizing and application or applies material and document relationships.	Little description and relating information security and other technology issues. Little synthesizing or application of material and document relationships.	No description or relationship of information security or other technology issues. Doesn’t synthesize or apply material and document relationships.
	Clearly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.	Basically identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.	Weakly identifies and articulates the cost of overall security solution.	Little identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. May not link any costs to technologies identified.	No identification or articulation of the costs regarding technology solution. No link of any costs to technologies identified.
	Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	Basically Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	Weakly Synthesizes and applies logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	Little synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.	No synthesis or application of logical SDLC processes and schedule to overall solution deployment.
Solution Diagram and Illustration
	Network diagram and accompanying illustration are strongly linked to proposed solution and content	Network diagram and accompanying illustration are generally linked to proposed solution and content	Network diagram and accompanying illustration are weakly linked to proposed solution and content	Network diagram and accompanying illustration are haphazardly linked to proposed solution and content	Network diagram and accompanying illustration are not linked to proposed solution and content
Security Strategy
	Each defined milestone is directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	Most milestones are related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	Milestones are weakly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	Milestone are haphazardly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.	No milestones are directly related to overall strategy/solution and clearly mitigates the risk or issue.
	Clearly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers all three requirements.	Basically identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least two of the three requirements.	Weakly identifies security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes and technologies that relate to the risks. Covers at least one of the requirements.	Little identification of security solutions and assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. May not cover one of the requirements.	Doesn’t identify security solutions or assumptions that consist of people, processes or technologies that relate to the risks. Doesn’t cover any of the three requirements.
	Clearly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution	Basically describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution	Weakly describes the linkage and constraints associated with solution	Little description of the linkage and constraints associated with solution	No description of any linkage or constraints associated with solution
Timeline
	Clear and detailed SDLC tasks that logically leads to the proposed solutions	Basic SDLC tasks are provided that generally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized	Weak and poorly detailed SDLC tasks are provided that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized	Haphazard and poorly detailed SDLC tasks that minimally lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized	No SDLC tasks are provided that lead or infer how the proposed solution will be realized No clear and defined tasks for each solution.
	Major tasks are clearly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.	Major tasks basically prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.	Major tasks weakly prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks and issues found.	Few tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.	No tasks prioritized according their importance to mitigating the risks or issues found.
	Clearly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	Basically defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	Weakly defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	Little defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.	No defined people resources (by type) that support each task in the timeline.
Finds and Applies Knowledge
	Used at least 5 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No APA style errors in sources.	Used at least 3 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 1 APA errors in sources.	Used at least 2 authoritative or scholarly sources in paper. No more than 2 APA errors in sources.	May have used 1 authoritative or scholarly source in paper. May not have used APA style formatting.	No authoritative or scholarly sources used in paper.
	All sources cited. No errors in citing material in paper.	All but 1 source cited. Had no more than 5 citing errors in paper.	All but 2 sources cited. Had no more than 10 citing errors in paper.	All but 3 sources cited. Had less than 15 APA citing errors in paper.	No sources cited or had more than 15 APA citing errors in paper.
Organization, Execution and Appearance
	Prepared MS Word document, used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	MS Word document didn’t follow up to two (2) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	MS Word document didn’t follow up to four (4) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	MS Word document followed only one (1) of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.	Non MS Word document didn’t any of the following: used consistent formatting, section subheadings, submitted one file, used instructor provided template, correct coversheet and separate reference page and meets minimum page count of 5 pages.
	No grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	Less than 5 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	Less than 10 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	Less than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.	More than 15 grammar errors, use of first/second person, spelling or punctuation errors.
Overall Score