Critical Thinking and Problem Solving
Assignment 3: Inductive and Deductive Arguments
In this assignment, you will apply key concepts covered in the module readings. You will identify the component parts of arguments and differentiate between various types of arguments such as inductive and deductive. You will then construct specific, original arguments.
There are two parts to the assignment. Complete both parts. The following is a summary of the assignment tasks.
Part 1
- 1a: Identify Components of Arguments
Identify the component parts of the argument, premises and conclusion, for the passages. Where applicable, highlight key words or phrases that identify a claim as a premise or a conclusion. Part 1a has three questions. - 1b: Identify Arguments as Inductive or Deductive
Identify the arguments as inductive or deductive for given passages. Offer a brief explanation why each argument is either inductive or deductive. 1b has three questions.
Part 2
- 2a: Argument Identification and Analysis
In these longer text passages, identify the key components of each argument. For each argument, list the main conclusion and the reasons (or premises) that support the conclusion. - 2b: Constructing Original Arguments
Construct one original inductive argument. Using 75–100 words, explain why the argument is an inductive one. Then, construct one original deductive argument. Using 75–100 words, explain why the argument is a deductive one. - 2c: Finding Native Argument Examples
Find one example of an argument from contemporary media; this can be a short argument. Include or reproduce the original passage of the argument, paraphrase the conclusion(s), and identify the argument as either inductive or deductive. Using 75–100 words, explain why the argument is either inductive or deductive.
Download details for this assignment here and respond to each item thoroughly.
Submit your assignment in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc. For example, if your name is John Smith, your document will be named SmithJ_M1_A3.doc.
By Wednesday, November 23, 2016, deliver your assignment to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox.
| Assignment 3 Grading Criteria | Maximum Points |
| Identified and explained types and component parts of arguments displaying analysis and application of research. | 24 |
| Accurately identified key component parts of arguments in longer text passages, reflecting comprehension and critical thinking. | 12 |
| Constructed original inductive and deductive arguments demonstrating in-depth understanding of concepts. | 30 |
| Evaluated and explained instances from contemporary media to identify arguments as representative of inductive or deductive reasoning. | 20 |
| Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | 14 |
| Total: | 100 |
10 years ago
25
Purchase the answer to view it

- inductive_and_deductive_arguments.docx
- Assignment 2: The Multiplier Effect Assignment 2: The Multiplier Effect Go to “FRB: Press Release—FOMC statement—December 16, 2009.” You should now find a press release from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, dated December 16, 2009, wh
- Need help with a paper 1-2 page APA style paper summarizing research in the area of Information security awareness. You may address and focus on any topics that fall within information security awareness theories and programs. The heading for the last sec
- Assignment for Kim
- BSHS 406 Week 3 Assignment Sexuality and Development
- 100 yen sushi house case study
- Need help with this
- After completing
- For this assignment, select one of the following topics that expand on decision making:
- 2 brief paragraph
- HUM 130 Week 6 DQ 2