CRIMINAL JUSTICE FORENSICS

Bite marks are no longer considered a way to specifically identify someone, but it can be used to exclude or include a person of interest. As a juror on a homicide case, you have heard an odonotologist discuss the bite mark evidence located on the victim and how the suspect cannot be excluded as to whom the bite mark belongs.

If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion as to how the bite mark would possibly exclude the suspect.

If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion as to how the bite mark would possibly include the suspect.

This Assignment above is already complete your next assignment is to:

Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

You Must Provide Feedback on what they have written.

You should include your thoughts associated with their posted information.

Additionally, you are to contribute to the discussion by adding support or constructive alternatives to your classmates’ posts.

Each response should be a minimum of 200 words.

You are to provide feedback from two students discussion posts

Two discussion posts 200 words each= 400 words total for the two different student responses

See attachment below for two different student responses I provided for you