CRIMINAL JUSTICE FORENSICS

THIS IS DUE MONDAY JUNE 16, 2014 at 1:30 P.M. USA TIME

Arson dogs are useful tools for finding accelerants in locations where human investigators cannot. Some believe that arson dogs and their indication of possible accelerant residue should not be used as evidence in court.

Do you think arson dogs come up with better results than a chemical sniffer? Why or why not? Provide evidence to support your opinion.

If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion for allowing arson dog findings to be entered into court.

If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion for preventing arson dog findings to be entered into court.

This Assignment above is already complete your next assignment is to:

Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts.

You Must Provide Feedback on what they have written.

You should include your thoughts associated with their posted information.

Additionally, you are to contribute to the discussion by adding support or constructive alternatives to your classmates’ posts.

Each response should be a minimum of 200 words.

You are to provide feedback from two students discussion posts

Two discussion posts 200 words each= 400 words total for the two different student responses

See attachment below for two different student responses I provided for you