Comparing Efficacy Research and Program Evaluation
Use your Royse, Thyer, and Padgett text, Program Evaluation, to complete the following:
Read Chapter 1, "Introduction," pages 1–29.
Read Carnes-Holt and Bratton's 2014 article, "The Efficacy of Child Parent Relationship Therapy for Adopted Children With Attachment Disruptions," in Journal of Counseling and Development, volume 92, issue 3, pages 328–337. This article presents a study that examines the effectiveness of a specialized counseling intervention using an experimental design.
Read Gondolf's 2004 article, "Evaluating Batterer Counseling Programs: A Difficult Task Showing Some Effects and Implications," in Aggression and Violent Behavior, volume 9, issue 6, pages 605–631. This article reviews evaluations of batterer programs using a variety of methodological designs, presents the results of a multi-site evaluation of batterer programs, and makes recommendations for improved batterer counseling programs.
After reading and carefully comparing the two assigned articles from this unit's readings, respond to the following questions:
What differences do you note between efficacy research and program evaluation?
What are the key strengths of efficacy research? What are the key strengths of program evaluation?
Based on your review, what contribution does each of these types of research make to the counseling field?
What is a point from any of the articles that you can apply in your current work setting or your ideal counseling fieldwork setting?
9 years ago
10
Purchase the answer to view it

- order_54032_130258.edited.doc
- Powerpoint Presentation
- Please Automata Theory, Grammars and Languages
- Can you help me
- Midway Company Performance Summary Power Point
- Powerpoint Presentation
- Short Paper on Booker T Washington and the role he played during the Jim Crow era
- Original and plagiarism free work needed
- BUS 475 Week 9 Assignment 2: Challenges in the Global Business Environment
- Thinking
- Answer the following questions 1. how much information should go into the documentation. Based on your understanding of the issues in this section, do you think the auditor should include more material than necessary just to protect him/herself? What are
