Casino Gambling Information Technology System
Information Technology Risk Assessment For
Risk Assessment Annual Document Review History
The Risk Assessment is reviewed, at least annually, and the date and reviewer recorded on the table below.
Review Date | Reviewer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
2 IT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION.. 2
5 RISK LIKELIHOOD DETERMINATION.. 11
List of Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Risk Assessment Matrix. 18
List of Figures
Figure 1 – IT System Boundary Diagram.. 4
Figure 2 – Information Flow Diagram.. 5
List of Tables
Table A: Risk Classifications. 1
Table B: IT System Inventory and Definition. 2
Table C: Threats Identified. 4
Table D: Vulnerabilities, Threats, and Risks. 5
Table F: Risks-Controls-Factors Correlation. 8
Table G: Risk Likelihood Definitions. 9
Table H: Risk Likelihood Ratings. 9
Table I: Risk Impact Rating Definitions. 13
Table J: Risk Impact Analysis. 13
Table K: Overall Risk Rating Matrix. 15
Risk assessment participants:
Participant roles in the risk assessment in relation assigned agency responsibilities:
Risk assessment techniques used:
Risk Level | Risk Description & Necessary Actions |
High | The loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could be expected to have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets or individuals. |
Moderate | The loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could be expected to have a serious adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets or individuals. |
Low | The loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could be expected to have a limited adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets or individuals. |
2 IT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION
2 IT SYSTEM CHARACTERIZATION
Table B: IT System Inventory and Definition
IT System Inventory and Definition Document | ||||||||
I. IT System Identification and Ownership | ||||||||
IT System ID |
| IT System Common Name |
| |||||
Owned By |
| |||||||
Physical Location |
| |||||||
Major Business Function |
| |||||||
System Owner Phone Number |
| System Administrator(s) Phone Number |
| |||||
Data Owner(s) Phone Number(s) |
| Data Custodian(s) Phone Number(s) |
| |||||
Other Relevant Information |
| |||||||
II. IT System Boundary and Components | ||||||||
IT System Description and Components |
| |||||||
IT System Interfaces |
| |||||||
IT System Boundary |
| |||||||
III. IT System Interconnections (add additional lines, as needed) | ||||||||
Agency or Organization | IT System Name | IT System ID | IT System Owner | Interconnection Security Agreement Status | ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Table B: IT System Inventory and Definition (continued)
Overall IT System Sensitivity Rating and Classification | Overall IT System Sensitivity Rating Must be “high” if sensitivity of any data type is rated “high” on any criterion |
High Moderate Low | |
IT System Classification Must be “Sensitive” if overall sensitivity is “high”; consider as “Sensitive” if overall sensitivity is “moderate” | |
Sensitive Non-Sensitive |
Description or diagram of the system and network architecture, including all components of the system and communications links connecting the components of the system, associated data communications and networks:
Figure 1 – IT System Boundary Diagram
Description or a diagram depicting the flow of information to and from the IT system, including inputs and outputs to the IT system and any other interfaces that exist to the system:
Figure 2 – Information Flow Diagram
Identification of Vulnerabilities
Vulnerabilities were identified by:
Threats were identified by:
The threats identified are listed in Table C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks were identified by:
The way vulnerabilities combine with credible threats to create risks is identified Table D.
Risk No. | Vulnerability | Threat | Risk of Compromise of | Risk Summary |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
Table E documents the IT security controls in place and planned for the IT system.
Control Area | In-Place/ | Description of Controls | |
1 Risk Management | |||
1.1 IT Security Roles & Responsibilities |
|
| |
1.2 Business Impact Analysis |
|
| |
1.3 IT System & Data Sensitivity Classification |
|
| |
1.4 IT System Inventory & Definition |
|
| |
1.5 Risk Assessment |
|
| |
1.6 IT Security Audits |
|
| |
2 IT Contingency Planning | |||
2.1 Continuity of Operations Planning |
|
| |
2.2 IT Disaster Recovery Planning |
|
| |
2.3 IT System & Data Backup & Restoration |
|
| |
3 IT Systems Security | |||
3.1 IT System Hardening |
|
| |
3.2 IT Systems Interoperability Security |
|
| |
3.3 Malicious Code Protection |
|
| |
3.4 IT Systems Development Life Cycle Security
|
|
| |
4 Logical Access Control | |||
4.1 Account Management |
|
| |
4.2 Password Management |
|
| |
4.3 Remote Access |
|
| |
5 Data Protection | |||
4.4 Data Storage Media Protection |
|
| |
4.5 Encryption |
|
| |
6 Facilities Security | |||
6.1 Facilities Security |
|
| |
7 Personnel Security | |||
7.1 Access Determination & Control |
|
| |
7.2 IT Security Awareness & Training |
|
| |
7.3 Acceptable Use |
|
| |
8 Threat Management | |||
8.1 Threat Detection |
|
| |
8.2 Incident Handling |
|
| |
8.3 Security Monitoring & Logging |
|
| |
9 IT Asset Management | |||
9.1 IT Asset Control |
|
| |
9.2 Software License Management |
|
| |
9.3 Configuration Management & Change Control |
|
| |
Table E correlates the risks identified in Table C with relevant IT security controls documented in Table D and with other mitigating or exacerbating factors.
Risk No. | Risk Summary | Correlation of Relevant Controls & Other Factors |
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
13 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
5 RISK LIKELIHOOD DETERMINATION
Table G defines the risk likelihood ratings.
Effectiveness of Controls | Probability of Threat Occurrence (Natural or Environmental Threats) or Threat Motivation and Capability (Human Threats) | ||
Low | Moderate | High | |
Low | Moderate | High | High |
Moderate | Low | Moderate | High |
High | Low | Low | Moderate |
Table G, evaluates the effectiveness of controls and the probability or motivation and capability of each threat to BFS and assigns a likelihood, as defined in Table F, to each risk documented in Table C.
Risk No. | Risk Summary | Risk Likelihood Evaluation | Risk Likelihood Rating |
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
Risk No. | Risk Summary | Risk Likelihood Evaluation | Risk Likelihood Rating |
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
Table I documents the ratings used to evaluate the impact of risks.
Magnitude of Impact | Impact Definition |
High | Occurrence of the risk: (1) may result in human death or serious injury; (2) may result in the loss of major COV tangible assets, resources or sensitive data; or (3) may significantly harm, or impede the COV’s mission, reputation or interest. |
Moderate | Occurrence of the risk: (1) may result in human injury; (2) may result in the costly loss of COV tangible assets or resources; or (3) may violate, harm, or impede the COV’s mission, reputation or interest. |
Low | Occurrence of the risk: (1) may result in the loss of some tangible COV assets or resources or (2) may noticeably affect the COV’s mission, reputation or interest. |
Table J documents the results of the impact analysis, including the estimated impact for each risk identified in Table D and the impact rating assigned to the risk.
Risk No. | Risk Summary | Risk Impact | Risk Impact Rating |
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
Description of process used in determining impact ratings:
7 RISK DETERMINATION
Table K documents the criteria used in determining overall risk ratings.
Risk Likelihood | Risk Impact | ||
Low | Moderate | High | |
High | Low 10 x 1.0 = 10 | Moderate 50 x 1.0 = 50 | High 100 x 1.0 = 100 |
Moderate | Low 10 x 0.5 = 5 | Moderate 50 x 0.5 = 25 | Moderate 100 x 0.5 = 50 |
Low | Low 10 x 0.1 = 1 | Low 50 x 0.1 = 5 | Low 100 x 0.1 = 10 |
Risk Scale: Low (1 to 10); Moderate (>10 to 50); High (>50 to 100)
Table L assigns an overall risk rating, as defined in Table K, to each of the risks documented in Table D.
Risk No. | Risk Summary | Risk Likelihood Rating | Risk Impact Rating | Overall Risk Rating |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
Description of process used in determining overall risk ratings:
8 RECOMMENDATIONS
Table M documents recommendations for the risks identified in Table D.
Risk No. | Risk | Risk Rating | Recommendations |
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
Exhibit 1: Risk Assessment Matrix
Risk No. | Vulnerability | Threat | Risk | Risk Summary | Risk Likelihood Rating | Risk Impact Rating | Overall Risk Rating | Analysis of Relevant Controls and Other Factors | Recommendations |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 years ago
Purchase the answer to view it

- information_technology_risk_assessment_report_for_casino_gambling_information_system.docx