Case Study #2: Integrating Disaster Recovery / IT Service Continuity with IT Governance FrameworksWizard Kim

JBRADDEN

Main

Home >Homework Answsers >Computer Science homework help


Provided an excellent overview of disaster recovery / IT service continuity. The overview appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an outstanding overview of disaster recovery / IT service continuity. The overview appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an overview of disaster recovery / IT service continuity. The overview appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an overview but the section lacked important details about disaster recovery and/or IT service continuity. Information from authoritative sources was cited and used in the overview.	Attempted to provide an introduction to the case study but this section lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources.	The introduction and/or overview sections of the paper were off topic.
Provided an excellent discussion which included 5 or more reasons why cybersecurity should be specifically addressed in the company’s DR/BCP strategies and plans. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an outstanding discussion of 4 or more reasons why cybersecurity should be specifically addressed in the company’s DR/BCP strategies and plans. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.	Provided a discussion of 3 or more reasons why cybersecurity should be addressed in the company’s DR/BCP strategies and plans. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.	Provided a discussion which included at least 2 reasons why cybersecurity should be addressed in the company’s DR/BCP strategies and plans. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.	Provided a discussion of cybersecurity in the context of DR/BCP decision making. The discussion lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources.	This section was missing, off topic, or failed to provide information aboutcybersecurity considerations for DR/BCP decisions.
Provided an excellent discussion of the CISO & CISO staff roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP planning. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an outstanding discussion of CISO & CISO staff roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP planning. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided a discussion of CISO & CISO staffroles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP planning. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.	Discussion provided some information aboutCISO & CISO staff best practices, roles, and responsibilities for DR/BCP planning. Mentioned information obtained from authoritative sources.	Discussion provided some information aboutCISO & CISO staff best practices, roles, and responsibilities for DR/BCP planning but the lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information from authoritative sources.	Did not address roles & responsibilities of theCISO & CISO staff for DR/BCP planning.
Provided an excellent discussion of CISO roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP implementation(i.e. acquistion & contracting). Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an outstanding discussion of CISO roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP implementation(i.e. acquistion & contracting). Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided a discussion of CISO roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP implementation(i.e. acquistion & contracting). Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.	Discussion provided some information about CISO best practices, roles, and responsibilities for DR/BCP implementation. Mentioned information obtained from authoritative sources.	Discussion provided some information about CISO best practices, roles, and responsibilities for DR/BCP implementation but the lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information from authoritative sources.	Did not address roles & responsibilities of the CISO for DR/BCP implementation.
Provided an excellent discussion of CISO roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP execution (i.e. activating and overseeing recovery operations). Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided an outstanding discussion of CISO roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP execution (i.e. activating and overseeing recovery operations). Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.	Provided a discussion of CISO roles, responsibilities, and best practices for integrating cybersecurity into DR/BCP execution (i.e. activating and overseeing recovery operations). Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.	Discussion provided some information about CISO best practices, roles, and responsibilities for DR/BCP execution. Mentioned information obtained from authoritative sources.	Discussion provided some information about CISO best practices, roles, and responsibilities for DR/BCP execution but the lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information from authoritative sources.	Did not address roles & responsibilities of the CISO for DR/BCP execution.
Demonstrated excellence in the integration of standard cybersecurity terminology into the case study.	Provided an outstanding integration of standard cybersecurity terminology into the case study.	Integrated standard cybersecurity terminology into the into the case study	Used standard cybersecurity terminology but this usage was not well integrated with the discussion.	Misused standard cybersecurity terminology.	Did not integrate standard cybersecurity terminology into the discussion.
Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. Reference list entries and in-text citations are correctly formatted using the appropriate APA style for each type of resource.	Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. One or two minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries.	Work contains a reference list containing entries for all cited resources. No more than 3 minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries.	Work has no more than three paragraphs with omissions of citations crediting sources for facts and information. Work contains a reference list containing entries for cited resources. Work contains no more than 5 minor errors in APA format for in-text citations and/or reference list entries.	Work attempts to credit sources but demonstrates a fundamental failure to understand and apply the APA formatting standard as defined in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6^th ed.).	Reference list is missing. Work demonstrates an overall failure to incorporate and/or credit authoritative sources for information used in the paper.
Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.	Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment’s directions).	Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc. OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Professional appearance could be improved.	Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement.	Submitted work meets minimum requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance.	No work submitted.
No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.	Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance.	Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work.	Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Work is unprofessional in appearance.	Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage.	No work submitted.