Business Law
anserplouisThe Parol Evidence Rule forbids allowing oral statements (evidence) to contradict a written contract. The purpose is clear: once an agreement has been reduced to writing, only a subsequent modification in writing should be allowed to modify the contract in the interest of finality and clarity. Without the rule, both written agreements and oral agreements concerning the same contract would have equal weight. Is this rule just? Is the rule necessary to clarify and finalize agreements?
at least 300 words, APA reference
11 years ago
5
Answer(1)![blurred-text]()
Purchase the answer to view it
NOT RATED
business_law.edited.docx
Bids(1)
other Questions(10)
- Discussion questions wk4 GEN499
- FIN - Weighted Average and FIFO costing method Problems
- Business Report Questions
- "Cash and Credit"
- Finance Multiple Problems Assignment
- Introduction to Biometrics Unit 3 Discussion Board 3 8/9/14
- Financial Accounting- As of December 31, Gammelguard Corporation has outstanding accounts
- selenium web driver
- case study
- International relations
