business communication essay 10 pages

1. The 10 to 15 page paper for content does NOT include the cover page, the table of contents, and the works cited page …. The objective of this assignment is to meet or exceed the content requirement addressing 3 theories or concepts in each areas Human Relations, Communications, Intercultural Relations, and Ethics.
2. Ethics issue …. You only need 3 of the Ethical Yardstick or a combination of 2 Ethical Yardsticks and Strategic Ambiguity  
3. Remember to include in the Introduction the type of organization (vertical, horizontal …note most are vertical) and an Organization chart
4. Remember to identify 3 key findings of your study in the conclusion
5. Remember to include a Works Cited page

Reminder the rating of this project is based on applying three of the following sets of theories, in each category (HR, Communications, Intercultural and Ethics), to your company:

THE HUMAN Relations Theory (select 3 theories and provide 3 examples of how your organization meets or does not meet the criteria for each theory)

• • Zaremba ch 2 Taylor/ Fayol /Hawthorne / McGregor /Maslow
  • Zaremba ch 3 Peters and Waterman / Systems / Critical/ Feminism

THE COMMUNICATIONS ISSUES (select 3 concepts and provide 3 examples of how your organization meets or does not meet the criteria for each concept)

• • Time & Distance/Business Etiquette (Guffy Ch11)
  • /communication culture (Ch 6 Zaremba)
  • /Teamwork/Crisis Management (Ch 10 Zaremba 3rd edition)

THE INTERCULTURAL RELATIONSHIPS (select 3 theories/concepts and provide 3 examples of how your organization meets or does not meet the criteria for each theory/concept)

(Ch 11 Zaremba and Guffy Ch 1) High context or low context culture/barriers/ overcoming barriers

ETHICS ISSUES (select 3 theories -- 3 of the Ethical Yardstick or a combination of 2 Ethical Yardsticks and Strategic Ambiguity) and provide 3 examples of how your organization meets or does not meet the criteria for each theory.  

•  Zaremba Ch 4 Employing Ethical Yardsticks: Four Rulers for Consideration and Strategic Ambiguity