| BUSA 5061 | Class or Cohort _________________________ | |
| Dakota Office Products Case Analylsis | | | | | |
| Grading Rubric | Student _________________________________ | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| TOPIC OR ISSUE | Possible Points | | Points Earned | Comments | |
| | | | | | |
| Cover Page | 5 | | | | |
| 5: Complete, attractive title page | | | | | |
| 3-4: Brief, less attractive | | | | | |
| 1-2: Very brief, not attractive | | | | | |
| 0: Missing cover page | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Format and Style | 5 | | | | |
| 5: No errors, clear | | | | | |
| 4: Few errors, uses subheadings | | | | | |
| 3: No subheadings, unclear format | | | | | |
| 1-2: Poor style or format | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Introduction | 10 | | | | |
| 9-10: Clear, well-written, answers "what or why" | | | | | |
| 7-8: Too long, too short, not clear | | | | | |
| 5-6: Weak introduction | | | | | |
| 0: Missing introduction | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Case Analysis | 30 | | | | |
| 29-30: Complete, well-supported, organized | | | | | |
| 27-28: Moderate discussion of issues and alternatives | | | | | |
| 25-26: Inadequate discussion | | | | | |
| 15-24: Highly inadequate discussion, no alternatives | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Summary | 10 | | | | |
| 9-10: Clear, well-written, relates to intro | | | | | |
| 5-8: Too long, too short, not clear | | | | | |
| 0: Omitted summary | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Use of Activity-Based Costing | 10 | | | | |
| 10: Superior application of ABC | | | | | |
| 9: Good application of ABC | | | | | |
| 7-8: Moderate use of ABC or other managerial accounting concepts | | | | | |
| 5-6: Inadequate use of managerial accounting concepts | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Grammar and Computations | 15 | | | | |
| 15: No errors | | | | | |
| 14: 1-2 errors | | | | | |
| 13: 3-4 errors | | | | | |
| 12: 5-6 errors | | | | | |
| 11: Overall inadequate writing skill or computational skill | | | | | |
| 10-5: Very poor writing skill or computational skill | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Quality of Analysis or Thought | 15 | | | | |
| 15: Superior analysis of managerial accounting issues and alternatives | | | | |
| 14: Good analysis of managerial accounting issues and alternatives | | | | | |
| 12-13: Moderate analysis of managerial accounting issues | | | | | |
| 10-11: Inadequate analysis of managerial accounting issues | | | | | |
| 5-9: Highly deficient analysis of managerial accounting issues | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | 100 | | | | |
| TOTAL POINTS | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
xoon
12 years ago
8502845_-_solutions_-_copy_of_rubric_for_dakota_case_busa_5061.xls
