BUS 309 WEEK 3 CHAPTER 2 QUIZ
olufunmilolaQuestion 1
Which of the following considerations about utilitarianism is correct?
[removed] | The great 19th century utilitarians, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, believed that pleasure and happiness were different things. | |
[removed] | Unlike Mill, Bentham was only concerned with the amount of pleasure that an action produces, not the quality of the pleasure. | |
[removed] | Act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism boil down to the same thing. | |
[removed] | Utilitarians believe that we can't compare one person's happiness with that of another. |
Question 2
According to Kant
[removed] | good will is the only thing that is good in itself. | |
[removed] | an action has moral worth if it is consistent with the categorical imperative. | |
[removed] | only actions based on feeling or sentiment have moral worth. | |
[removed] | a self-interested person can never do the right action. |
Question 3
Which of the following represents a utilitarian belief?
[removed] | Rightness is determined by what most people want, i.e., by majority rule. | |
[removed] | Rightness is determined by what will bring about the most good. | |
[removed] | We should concern ourselves only with the immediate results of our actions. | |
[removed] | We must always disregard our own happiness when deciding what to do. |
Question 4
"If you want to go to law school, then you must take the LSAT exam." This statement is an example of
[removed] | the transcendental imperative. | |
[removed] | a hypothetical imperative. | |
[removed] | the categorical imperative. | |
[removed] | irrational behavior. |
Question 5
Kant believed that we should always act
[removed] | in such a way that we can will the maxim of our action to be a local law. | |
[removed] | in a way that treats success as an end in itself, never merely as means. | |
[removed] | in a way that would be universally unacceptable to all rational beings. | |
[removed] | in a way that we can will the maxim of our action to become a universal law. |
Question 6
According to the utilitarian theory, an action is morally right if and only if
[removed] | it makes the person who does it happy. | |
[removed] | everyone prefers that action to any other action. | |
[removed] | it maximizes total, net happiness. | |
[removed] | it brings only happiness and causes no pain. |
Question 7
The case of the "deathbed promise" shows that
[removed] | utilitarianism may lead to conclusions that conflict with commonsense morality. | |
[removed] | keeping your promises never maximizes happiness. | |
[removed] | it was wrong to have made the promise in the first place. | |
[removed] | utilitarianism boils down to egoism. |
Question 8
According to W. D. Ross's theory
[removed] | a prima facie obligation is absolute and can never be overridden. | |
[removed] | what we should do in any specific set of circumstances will always be self-evident. | |
[removed] | it would be wrong to lie to a murderer even to save the life of a friend. | |
[removed] | we have various moral duties that can't be reduced to a single, overarching obligation. |
Question 9
Egoism as a psychological theory
[removed] | states that self-interest is the only thing that ever motivates anyone. | |
[removed] | is the same thing as ethical egoism. | |
[removed] | states that people are sometimes selfish. | |
[removed] | is based on egoism as an ethical theory. |
Question 10
Which of the following statements is true regarding human rights?
[removed] | Human rights are equal rights; if X is a human right, then everyone has this right. | |
[removed] | Human rights are transferable and thus "alienable". | |
[removed] | Human rights rest on particular roles and special relationships. | |
[removed] | Human rights are not natural but are always grounded in a specific legal or political system. |
Question 11
Nonconsequentialists like Ross believe that
[removed] | we have no obligation to promote general welfare. | |
[removed] | utilitarianism doesn't require us to sacrifice as much as we should to help other people. | |
[removed] | morality permits each of us a sphere in which to pursue our own plans and goals. | |
[removed] | people's so-called "moral rights" are unimportant when determining the right course of action. |
Question 12
Utilitarianism is appealing as a standard for moral decision making in business. Which of the following provides a reason for this?
[removed] | Utilitarianism provides an objective way of resolving conflicts of self-interest. | |
[removed] | Utilitarianism provides a rigid approach to moral decision making. | |
[removed] | Utilitarianism provides a fuzzy standard for formulating and testing policies. | |
[removed] | Utilitarianism gives us firm rules to follow, rules that don't permit exceptions. |
Question 13
The only accurate statement about consequentalism is:
[removed] | Utilitarianism is a nonconsequentialist ethical theory. | |
[removed] | Utilitarianism is an egoistic normative theory. | |
[removed] | Consequentialism says that the moral rightness of an action is determined solely by its results. | |
[removed] | Nonconsequentialists deny that consequences have any moral significance. |
Question 14
The statement that best defines rights is
[removed] | all moral rights are legal rights. | |
[removed] | a negative right is a right to receive certain benefits. | |
[removed] | a right is an entitlement to act or to have others act in a certain way. | |
[removed] | all moral rights are human rights. |
Question 15
A key idea of Immanuel Kant's ethical theory is that:
[removed] | all duties are prima facie duties. | |
[removed] | the moral permissibility of our actions depends entirely upon their consequences. | |
[removed] | we should treat people as ends in themselves, never merely as means. | |
[removed] | only pleasure has intrinsic value. |
NOTE: IF SOME OF YOUR QUESTION NOT AMONG PLEASE MESSAGE ME I WILL PROVIDE ANSWER FOR YOU FOR FREE
9 years ago
Purchase the answer to view it

- answer.docx